|
Behavioral Plan
|
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePotential Problem
|
|
20 pts
Advanced
Student is described clearly and concisely. Behavioral issue(s) is/are clearly identified, and the impact of the behavior(s) is/are clearly explained. Reader obtains a precise image of the student and the situation by reading this description.
|
17 pts
Proficient
Student is described clearly. Behavioral issue is clearly identified, and the impact of the behavior is explained. Reader obtains an image of the student and the situation by reading this description.
|
14 pts
Basic
Student is somewhat described. Behavioral issue is mentioned. Reader obtains an idea of the student and the situation by reading this description.
|
11 pts
Minimal
Student is mentioned. Behavioral issue is mentioned. Reader is unclear about the exact nature of either the student or the need for a behavioral plan.
|
0 pts
No Marks
|
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInTASC #3 – Learning Environments
The teacher works with learners to create environments that support individual and collaborative learning, encouraging positive social interaction, active engagement in learning, and self motivation.
threshold: 3.0 pts
|
|
4 pts
Advanced – The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills
|
3 pts
Proficient – The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.
|
2 pts
Basic – The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking.
|
1 pts
Minimal – The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills.
|
|
—
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn Addition to the Rules
|
|
20 pts
Advanced
Specific situations that tend to trigger the identified misbehaviors are identified and specifically addressed by these additional rules.
|
17 pts
Proficient
Specific situations that tend to trigger general misbehaviors are identified and addressed by these additional rules.
|
14 pts
Basic
General situations that tend to trigger misbehaviors are identified. The additional rules may or may not address these situations.
|
11 pts
Minimal
Additional rules are lacking in direct connection to the targeted misbehaviors.
|
0 pts
No Marks
|
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInTASC #3B – Learning Environments
The teacher works with learners to create environments that support individual and collaborative learning, encouraging positive social interaction, active engagement in learning, and self motivation.
threshold: 3.0 pts
|
|
4 pts
Advanced – The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.
|
3 pts
Proficient – The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.
|
2 pts
Basic – The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking.
|
1 pts
Minimal – The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills.
|
|
—
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRoutines
|
|
20 pts
Advanced
Multiple classroom routines (at least 4) that all students are required to follow but might serve as a trigger for misbehavior are identified, and adapted strategies for this student are presented.
|
17 pts
Proficient
Some classroom routines (3) that all students are required to follow but might serve as a trigger for misbehavior are identified, and adapted strategies for this student are presented.
|
14 pts
Basic
A few classroom routines (2) that all students are required to follow but might serve as a trigger for misbehavior are identified, and adapted strategies for this student are presented.
|
11 pts
Minimal
One classroom routine that all students are required to follow but might serve as a trigger for misbehavior is identified, and/or adapted strategies are not presented.
|
0 pts
No Marks
|
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInTASC #3C – Learning Environments
The teacher works with learners to create environments that support individual and collaborative learning, encouraging positive social interaction, active engagement in learning, and self motivation.
threshold: 3.0 pts
|
|
4 pts
Advanced – The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.
|
3 pts
Proficient – The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.
|
2 pts
Basic – The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking.
|
1 pts
Minimal – The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills.
|
|
—
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTransitions
|
|
20 pts
Advanced
Techniques and procedures for making transitions (minimum of 3 situations) are addressed and preventive behaviors are presented.
|
17 pts
Proficient
Techniques and procedures for making transitions (2 situations) are addressed and preventive behaviors are presented.
|
14 pts
Basic
Techniques and procedures for making transitions (1 situation) are addressed and preventive behaviors are presented.
|
11 pts
Minimal
Transitions are addressed but procedures and/or preventive behaviors are missing.
|
0 pts
No Marks
|
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInTASC #3D – Learning Environments
The teacher works with learners to create environments that support individual and collaborative learning, encouraging positive social interaction, active engagement in learning, and self motivation.
threshold: 3.0 pts
|
|
4 pts
Advanced – The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.
|
3 pts
Proficient – The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.
|
2 pts
Basic – The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking.
|
1 pts
Minimal – The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills.
|
|
—
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePositive Reinforcements
|
|
20 pts
Advanced
Each targeted behavior is linked with a specific positive reinforcement strategy.
|
17 pts
Proficient
Positive reinforcement strategies linked to the targeted behaviors are presented
|
14 pts
Basic
Positive reinforcement strategies are presented but not linked to the targeted behaviors
|
11 pts
Minimal
Positive reinforcement strategies are presented for some but not all of the targeted behaviors.
|
0 pts
No Marks
|
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInTASC #3E – Learning Environments
The teacher works with learners to create environments that support individual and collaborative learning, encouraging positive social interaction, active engagement in learning, and self motivation.
threshold: 3.0 pts
|
|
4 pts
Advanced – The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.
|
3 pts
Proficient – The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effect
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
All Rights Reserved Terms and Conditions
College pals.com Privacy Policy 2010-2018
| |