PSY 663 Topic 7 Discussions

PSY 663 Topic 7 Discussions DQ 2 Consider how being part of a crowd or group changes your behavior. How can deindividuation change people’s behavior? Could deindividuation lead to positive outcomes? What is a way to encourage members of a crowd to behave in line with their “normal” values?

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.

ADDITIONAL DETAILS 

Could deindividuation lead to positive outcomes?

Introduction

Deindividuation is a psychological phenomenon that happens when people feel anonymous. It’s a natural reaction to feeling a sense of anonymity and detachment from the group. In this article, we’ll explore whether deindividification can lead to positive outcomes for individuals or groups.

While deindividuation can lead to negative outcomes, it can also help people accomplish positive goals.

While deindividuation can lead to negative outcomes, it can also help people accomplish positive goals.

Deindividuation is a psychological phenomenon that occurs when an individual’s sense of self-awareness is impaired or reduced. As a result, they lose their inhibitions and become more likely to engage in risky behavior. The term was coined by Hermann Hesse in his novel “Demian”. In this book, the main character deals with his own identity crisis as he struggles between what he wants to be and who he actually is; this leads him down an immoral path that ends up destroying him emotionally and mentally as well as physically (Hesse). However, there are examples where this process has led individuals towards greater things than just turning into animalistic psychopaths; such as helping others achieve their dreams by setting goals together or simply being more caring towards others around them without even knowing each other beforehand!

When group members have the same positive identity, they work together more effectively.

When group members have the same positive identity, they work together more effectively. They can feel like they’re part of something bigger than themselves and that’s why they are willing to work hard for the team or organization. The group identity is important for them, so it makes sense that deindividuation would lead to greater willingness in this way.

In fact, research has shown that when people participate in self-affirming activities such as sports teams or bands (or even just having fun), their ability to see things from others’ perspectives increases dramatically! A study published by Psychologie Magazine showed that participants who participated in athletic competitions showed significant improvements in empathy skills compared with those who didn’t participate at all – but also showed no change whatsoever when compared against control groups who did not compete at all either way!

Positive deindividuation results when the group is perceived in a positive manner.

If a group is seen as having positive characteristics, the members will tend to behave in a more positive manner. For instance, if you are part of an athletic team and you’re playing against another team with better players and more experience than yours, then it may be easier for your team to lose than win because of how they feel about themselves as individuals.

Similarly, if there are many people involved in an organization (like a company), then those who don’t like the job or do not get along well with others may try to isolate themselves from their peers by joining some kind of club or organization where they can avoid interacting with coworkers who don’t share their interests or values. In this way deindividuation leads individuals away from their normal roles as employees towards doing something else instead: joining clubs/organizations where they’ll be surrounded by people who share similar interests (or at least tolerate them).

Deindividuation can increase self-esteem.

Deindividuation can also increase self-esteem. This is because, when you’re part of a group, you feel like you’re part of something bigger than yourself. You aren’t just an individual; instead, it’s more like being part of a team or even an organization.

For example: If someone were walking down the street and saw me wearing my jacket with my name on it (Jordan Kelleher), they might think that I’m trying to look cool or something similar. But if they saw me wearing the same jacket with other people’s names printed on them (like “Joe”, “Jim”, etc.), they’d know that I wasn’t trying to be cool—I was just happy being around them!

Deindividuation may support democracy.

Deindividuation can also support democracy. Democracy is based on the idea that everyone is equal and should be treated as such. However, when people feel like they are part of a group, it’s easier for them to see other members as equals—and this sense of equality can help them work together towards common goals.

In one study from 2015 by Jennifer Wood and colleagues at the University of Michigan (published in British Journal Social Psychology), participants were asked to complete an online survey while their brain activity was measured using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). They were separated into two groups: those who had been randomly assigned either deindividuated status or normatively identified status (i.e., being told how others viewed them). After completing their surveys and getting scanned with fMRI machines, both groups were asked about how much they agreed with statements like “I felt competent” or “I felt competent in my job,” followed by questions about whether they would vote for Obama again if given another chance at voting next month.

When everyone in the group has the same goal, they’re willing to work harder and longer than they would when working alone.

Deindividuation is a psychological phenomenon that occurs when people lose their sense of self and act as if they don’t know who they are. This can be seen in experiments where participants were given a choice between two hats, one of which would make them feel more powerful or important than the other. When given the choice between these hats, deindividuation led to participants being willing to work longer and harder than those wearing either hat alone (or even both together).

When everyone in an organization has the same goal and works toward achieving it together, they’re more likely to put forth effort into reaching it—and not just because they want something better for themselves individually. Instead, when everyone feels like part of an entire group effort toward something big (like making money), they’ll put aside their own needs so that others can get theirs too!

Deindividuation can help people accomplish positive goals as well as negative ones.

Deindividuation is a psychological phenomenon that occurs when people feel anonymous, like they have no individual identity. This can lead to positive outcomes such as greater cooperation and helping others. It also has negative consequences, such as higher crime rates and lower levels of trust in society.

Deindividuation has been linked with increased antisocial behavior because it makes people less likely to care about the consequences of their actions or whether they’re breaking the law or not. The same effect could be seen when people are working towards common goals—for example, if everyone uses this method at work then there will be more productivity overall (positive deindividuation). On the other hand there could also be negative aspects since some employees may feel so disempowered by their peers’ behavior that they become depressed or angry about what’s happening around them (negative deindividuation).

Conclusion

Deindividuation can be dangerous and risky, but it’s also an opportunity to find common ground with others. Deindividuation can make people more willing to work together for a common cause, which is good for democracy as well as individual goals. The more we understand about deindividuation and its effects on human behavior, the more possible solutions we’ll have available when facing new challenges in the world today.