For this assignment, you will draw on the work you did in previous assignments and integrate all you have learned into a clear and concise application of your chosen theory to the parti
This is the final course project. In two previous assignments, you first analyzed a chosen theory and then justified its application. Now, it is time to put it all together.
By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following competencies and behaviors:
- Competency 6: Engage with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities.
- C6.GP.A: Apply knowledge of human behavior and the social environment, person-in-environment, and other multidisciplinary theoretical frameworks to engage with clients and constituencies.
- Related Assignment Criterion:
- 3. Critique and apply knowledge to understand person and environment.
- Related Assignment Criterion:
- C6.GP.A: Apply knowledge of human behavior and the social environment, person-in-environment, and other multidisciplinary theoretical frameworks to engage with clients and constituencies.
- Competency 7: Assess Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities.
- C7.GP.B: Apply knowledge of human behavior and the social environment, person-in-environment, and other multidisciplinary theoretical frameworks in the analysis of assessment data from clients and constituencies.
- Related Assignment Criterion:
- 3. Critique and apply knowledge to understand person and environment.
- Related Assignment Criterion:
- C7.GP.B: Apply knowledge of human behavior and the social environment, person-in-environment, and other multidisciplinary theoretical frameworks in the analysis of assessment data from clients and constituencies.
- Competency 8: Intervene with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities.
- C8.GP.B: Apply knowledge of human behavior and the social environment, person-in-environment, and other multidisciplinary theoretical frameworks in interventions with clients and constituencies.
- Related Assignment Criterion:
- 3. Critique and apply knowledge to understand person and environment.
- Related Assignment Criterion:
- C8.GP.B: Apply knowledge of human behavior and the social environment, person-in-environment, and other multidisciplinary theoretical frameworks in interventions with clients and constituencies.
- Competency 9: Evaluate Practice with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities.
- C9.GP.B: Apply knowledge of human behavior and the social environment, person-in-environment, and other multidisciplinary theoretical frameworks in the evaluation of outcomes.
- Related Assignment Criterion:
- 3. Critique and apply knowledge to understand person and environment.
- Related Assignment Criterion:
- C9.GP.B: Apply knowledge of human behavior and the social environment, person-in-environment, and other multidisciplinary theoretical frameworks in the evaluation of outcomes.
Assignment Description
For this assignment, you will draw on the work you did in previous assignments and integrate all you have learned into a clear and concise application of your chosen theory to the particular case of Joe the King. As with all assignments, it is vital to support the application of your chosen theory with scholarly research in the Capella University Library.
Assignment Instructions
The bullet points below correspond to grading criteria in the rubric. You may also want to read the rubric to better understand the performance levels that relate to each grading criterion. For this assignment you should:
- Describe how the theory you selected can be used to guide the processes of assessment, intervention, and evaluation.
- Explain how the theory guides social work practice both with individuals and families.
- Integrate multiple sources of knowledge, including research-based knowledge and practice wisdom.
- Critique and apply knowledge to understand person and environment.
- Provide documented examples that support the application of your chosen theory to this particular case study.
Additional Requirements
The assignment you submit is expected to meet the following requirements:
- Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
- APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting.
- Number of resources: Minimum of three scholarly sources. All literature cited should be current, with publication dates within the past five years.
- Length of paper: Minimum of four typed, double-spaced, typed pages.
- Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
- Due date: The assignment must be submitted to your instructor in the courseroom by the end of this week.
Resources
- Capella Writing Center.
- Evidence and APA.
- Social Work Masters Library Research GuideLinks to an external site..
View RubricWeek 10 Assignment – Integrating Theory Into Professional PracticeWeek 10 Assignment – Integrating Theory Into Professional PracticeCriteriaRatingsPtsDescribe how the selected theory can be used to guide the processes of assessment, intervention, and evaluation.view longer description50 to >42.5 ptsDISTINGUISHEDDescribes how the selected theory can be used to guide the processes of assessment, intervention, and evaluation and offers insight into real-world application.42.5 to >35 ptsPROFICIENTDescribes how the selected theory can be used to guide the processes of assessment, intervention, and evaluation.35 to >0 ptsBASICIdentifies how general theory can be used to guide the processes of assessment, intervention, and evaluation.0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCEDoes not describe how the selected theory can be used to guide the processes of assessment, intervention, and evaluation./ 50 ptsExplain how the theory guides social work practice with both individuals and families.view longer description50 to >42.5 ptsDISTINGUISHEDExplains how the theory guides social work practice with both individuals and families and offers insight into real-world application.42.5 to >35 ptsPROFICIENTExplains how the theory guides social work practice with both individuals and families.35 to >0 ptsBASICDescribes how the theory guides social work practice.0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCEDoes not explain how the theory guides social work practice with either individuals or families./ 50 ptsCritique and apply knowledge to understand person and environment. (C6.GP.A, C7.GP.B, C8.GP.B, C9.GP.B)view longer description50 to >42.5 ptsDISTINGUISHEDCritiques and applies knowledge to understand person and environment with clear examples provided.42.5 to >35 ptsPROFICIENTCritiques and applies knowledge to understand person and environment.35 to >0 ptsBASICDiscusses, but does not critique, person and environment.0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCEDoes not critique and apply knowledge to understand person and environment./ 50 ptsProvide documented examples that support the application of the selected theory to a particular case study.view longer description50 to >42.5 ptsDISTINGUISHEDProvides documented examples that support the application of the selected theory to a particular case study with clear connections to why it is the most appropriate theory.42.5 to >35 ptsPROFICIENTProvides documented examples that support the application of the selected theory to a particular case study.35 to >0 ptsBASICProvides limited documented examples that support the application of the selected theory to a particular case study.0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCEDoes not provide documented examples that support the application of the selected theory to a particular case study./ 50 ptsCommunicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.view longer description50 to >42.5 ptsDISTINGUISHEDCommunicates with exceptional clarity in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.42.5 to >35 ptsPROFICIENTCommunicates in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.35 to >0 ptsBASICCommunicates in a manner that is scholarly and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCEDoes not communicate in a manner that is consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession./ 50
Joe the King
Kiara Bonds
SWK5003
October 29, 2023
Professor Hall
Introduction
Human behavior is multifaceted because everyone knows that human beings have critical drives. Still, it can be challenging to understand how they make decisions and convince others why they made those decisions. Therefore, understanding and employing this knowledge helps social workers use different theories to explain behaviors and achieve positive outcomes for their clients. Approaches help social workers in comprehension and making positive behavior changes. This paper studies the movie Joe the King, and the most suitable theory for the case is Erikson’s psychosocial development theory. This theory will help reveal the underlying family problems in Henry’s family and scrutinize them under the eight developmental stages that define conflict resolution and adaptation to the environment.
Case Study
The movie “Joe the King” revolves around a boy called Henry who has two siblings, Joe and Mike, who are the oldest. The other family members include their dad, Bob, a drunkard and gambler, and a terrified and hardworking but shy mother called Teresa. The case study focuses on the issues surrounding Joe’s family, where Joe’s elder brother Mike appears to lead an ordinary life with ordinary friends, yet Joe gets ignored by him frequently. Due to Joe’s poor relationship with his father, he becomes a rebellious teenager, although he still deeply cares about everyone in his family (Gajos et al., 2022). However, Mike is ashamed of Joe, and his peers constantly remind him how a loser Joe is. He is only an outsider and is convinced that Joe’s engagement in crime is the only way to escape these challenges, which lands him in juvenile.
Critical Components in Erikson's Theory
Social workers dealing with Henry's family conflict would use Erik Erikson’s Psychosocial Development theory. According to this theory, every one of those eight phases represents contradictory challenges, which are to be successfully overcome for building confidence and social usefulness, and warns that it can lead to individuals feeling insufficient if these phases are not managed appropriately. Erikson’s development theory focuses on maintaining the proper balance between positive and negative human behavior since infancy to ensure that individuals can overcome life challenges and understand the world around them (Gross, 2020). For example, concerning the Henry family depicted in the film "Joe the King," the initial phase, Trust vs. mistrust, assesses if a child can trust adults. Joe appears to lack Trust with the people in his life, probably because he was not given consistent care. At the Autonomy vs Shame and Doubt stage, Joe appears to be in control of his body but feels ashamed or doubts about the other aspects of his life. In the Initiative vs. Guilt stage, Erikson argues that guilt is associated with arrogance and power, and Joe has no self-esteem due to parents who fail to support him, which aggravates his feelings of worthlessness and guilt.
On the other hand, the generativity vs. stagnation stage depicts Joe experiencing stagnation, especially in his power to contribute effectively among his peers, and he senses that he does not get it at all. Lastly, Ego Integrity vs. Despair occurs in adulthood when individuals reflect on their past lives. Although Joe and Mike are not at this stage yet, their parents can evaluate their behavior and make the necessary mistakes they have committed to raising their children (Juengst et al., 2022).
Evaluation, Assessment & Intervention
As per Erikson's theory, the Henry family's development stages are remarkably affected by the family dynamics in the movie "Joe the King." In order to better evaluate how well the Henry family was fairing, BRCS, a self-report of assessment of individual resilience and developmental progress, was used. The scale also helps the social worker measure the resilience level so that they can make better assessments, interventions, and evaluations. Using this scale for analysis in addition to information from the film, it is possible to locate the source of the crisis for effective intervention. Also, social workers should understand the merits and demerits of Erikson's theory before assessment to avoid falling prey to these dimensions.
Strengths and Weaknesses
According to Erikson’s Theory, human personality develops due to different challenges and opportunities individuals encounter daily. It significantly contributes to creating an individual's conscious identity, which impacts conduct and development over one's lifespan. Erikson acknowledges that many crises exist in life, and in each phase, people go through different challenges which play a huge role in one's development. This aligns with Erikson’s theory, which can be applied in simplifying Henry's family and explaining why each member behaved a certain way. One of the theory's weaknesses is that failure to succeed at any stage does not necessarily mean that subsequent stages will not succeed, and it could not be tested scientifically because success cannot be measured on these conceptual terms.
Potential Implications
When applying Erikson’s theory in social work, the worker can be influenced by internal and external factors; for each action, an accompanying consequence affects the individuals involved (Zatraw et al., 2019). An illustration of this from the movie “Joe the King” is when Joe is sent to juvenile, and his father feels remorseful and openly expresses how much he loves Joe.
Cultural Competency
Cultural competency is critical in social work as it forms the basis for successful relationship establishment. According to the NASW code of ethics, social workers should be cognizant of the impact of culture on human behavior and social life. Social workers should also appreciate every culture's strong and weak points, making them cross-cultural. When dealing with the Henry family, engaging with them non-judgmentally without criticizing their culture is necessary, as explained above. Such an approach, however, is beneficial in ensuring better responses towards a given assessment, intervention, or evaluation, thus paving ways toward meaningful engagement with the family.
Conclusion
The Henry family needs Erikson’s psychosocial development theory to address the current dynamics of the environment. This theory could lead to meaningful changes in people's behavior since it helps people understand themselves better in terms of personality changes during periods of psychosocial crisis in their lifespan. Applying this theory in analyzing the Henry family's situation, especially concerning Joe, can help inform interventions leading to adaptive behaviors necessary for healthy and balanced development through the evaluation of Erikson’s psychosocial development stages. Therefore, aspiring social workers may acquire hands-on training in analyzing family dynamics through a case example of the Henry family.
References
Gajos, J. M., Miller, C. R., Leban, L., & Cropsey, K. L. (2022). Adverse childhood experiences and adolescent mental health: Understanding the roles of gender and teenage risk and protective factors. Journal of affective disorders, 314, 303-308.
Gross, Y. (2020). Erikson's stages of psychosocial development. The Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences: Models and Theories, 179-184.
Juengst, S. B., Erler, K. S., Neumann, D., Kew, C. L. N., Goldin, Y., O'Neil-Pirozzi, T. M., … & Dijkers, M. (2022). Participation importance and satisfaction across the lifespan: A traumatic brain injury model systems study. Rehabilitation Psychology, 67(3), 344.
Zastrow, C., Kirst-Ashman, K. K., & Hessenauer, S. L. (2019). Empowerment series: Understanding human behavior and the social environment. Cengage Learning.
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
