Evaluation of Assigned Groups Dynamics Paper

Criteria

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Not Demonstrated

Describe the informal leader(s) exhibited within the group and give evidence for your impressions of their performance.

16-20 Points

Addresses criteria in detail, is concise and demonstrates evidence of quality writing.

11-15 Points

Moderately addresses criteria, is concise, and primarily well written.

6-10 Points

Somewhat addresses criteria; is not concise (too wordy) but is mostly well written.

1-5 Points

Poorly addresses the criteria but is wordy (not concise). Narrative lacks evidence of quality writing.

0 Points

Does not address the required criteria

Describe your group’s cohesiveness and supportive evidence for impressions that you have made.

16-20 Points

Addresses criteria in detail, is concise and demonstrates evidence of quality writing.

11-15 Points

Moderately addresses criteria, is concise, and primarily well written.

6-10 Points

Somewhat addresses criteria; is not concise (too wordy) but is mostly well written.

1-5 Points

Poorly addresses the criteria but is wordy (not concise). Narrative lacks evidence of quality writing.

0 Points

Does not address the required criteria

Differentiate the roles (i.e., task, maintenance, and hindering roles) that each member played within your group, describe, and provide evidence for your impressions.

16-20 Points

Addresses criteria in detail, is concise and demonstrates evidence of quality writing.

11-15 Points Moderately addresses criteria, is concise, and primarily well written.

6-10 Points

Somewhat addresses criteria; is not concise (too wordy) but is mostly well written.

1-5 Points

Poorly addresses the criteria but is wordy (not concise). Narrative lacks evidence of quality writing.

0 Points

Does not address the required criteria

Describe conflict(s) that arose within your group and how your group addressed any conflicts and the role taken be individual members and the group as a whole.

16-20 Points

Addresses criteria in detail, is concise and demonstrates evidence of quality writing.

11-15 Points

Moderately addresses criteria, is concise, and primarily well written.

6-10 Points

Somewhat addresses criteria; is not concise (too wordy) but is mostly well written.

1-5 Points

Poorly addresses the criteria but is wordy (not concise). Narrative lacks evidence of quality writing.

0 Points

Does not address the required criteria

References (must include any personal references)

9-10 Points

Greater than 3 valid/reliable references utilized (e.g., textbooks, journals). No discrepancies between in-text references and the reference list.

6-8 Points

Three valid/reliable references utilized. No more than 1 discrepancy between in-text references and the reference list.

3-5 Points

Two valid/reliable references utilized. No more than 2 discrepancies between in-text references and reference list.

1-2 Points

Only 1 valid/reliable reference utilized—greater than 2 discrepancies between in-text references and reference list.

0 Points

No valid/reliable references used, and or greater than 2 discrepancies between in-text references cited and reference list.

Mechanics and APA citations and references

9-10 Points

4 to 4.5 double-spaced pages.

No spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors. No APA errors

6-8 Points

4 to 4.5 double-spaced. One to 3 spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors, and or 1-3 APA errors.

3-5 Points

3 to 3.5 double-spaced pages. 4 to 5 spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors, and or 4-5 APA errors.

1-2 Points

less than 3 double-spaced pages. > than 6 spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors, and or greater than 6 APA errors.

0 Points

Paper not completed and or contains 7 or more APA, spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors.

Total