Describe the major financial and physical issues. Discuss the major demographic populations, providers, and regulatory bodies affected.
The purpose of this assignment is to describe the roles and responsibilities of health care management in addressing contemporary health care issue.
Consider the health care environment in which you currently work or plan to work, and select a specific health care organization within that setting to focus on for this assignment. Possible options could include an urban emergency center, a public health clinic, or a rural hospital. Research a current health care issue within your selected organization and any proposed initiatives to mitigate its impact on the community. Examples of current health care issues include the opioid crisis, the cost of prescription drugs, and coverage for health care, etc.
Address the following questions in a 1,500–1,750 word paper about how you would proceed in implementing initiatives to address the health care issue:
Describe the major financial and physical issues.
Discuss the major demographic populations, providers, and regulatory bodies affected.
Describe the major ethical considerations in the context of a Christian worldview perspective regarding the issue from a patient/family, patient care provider, and regulatory body perspective. Address the implications for carrying out work within the public arena with compassion, justice, and concern for the common good.
Based on your analysis, discuss how you would proceed in implementing initiatives to address the identified health care issue. Identify two possible solutions that could be used to meet the needs of the identified stakeholders.
Use 3 to 4 peer-reviewed resources to support your response.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Requirements: 1,500–1,750
9/30/23, 5:41 PMPage 1 of 10about:srcdocContemporary Health Care Issue – RubricMajor Financial and Physical Issues13 pointsCollapse All
9/30/23, 5:41 PMPage 2 of 10about:srcdocCriteria DescriptionMajor Financial and Physical Issues5. 5: Excellent13 pointsDescription of the major financial and physical issues of the selectedhealth care issue, including the plan to implement initiatives to addressthe issue, is thorough and includes substantial explanation and relevantsupporting details.4. 4: Good11.31 pointsDescription of the major financial and physical issues of the selectedhealth care issue, including the plan to implement initiatives to addressthe issue, is complete and includes explanation and relevant supportingdetails.3. 3: Satisfactory10.27 pointsDescription of the major financial and physical issues of the selectedhealth care issue, including the plan to implement initiatives to addressthe issue, is included but lacks explanation and relevant supportingdetails.2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory9.62 pointsDescription of the major financial and physical issues of the selectedhealth care issue, including the plan to implement initiatives to addressthe issue, is incomplete or incorrect.1. 1: Unsatisfactory0 pointsDescription of the major financial and physical issues of the selectedhealth care issue is not included.Major Demographic Populations, Providers, and RegulatoryBodies A!ected13 points
9/30/23, 5:41 PMPage 3 of 10about:srcdocCriteria DescriptionMajor Demographic Populations, Providers, and Regulatory Bodies Affected5. 5: Excellent13 pointsDescription of the major demographic populations, providers, andregulatory bodies affected by the selected health care issue, includingthe plan to implement initiatives to address the issue, is thorough andincludes substantial explanation and relevant supporting details.4. 4: Good11.31 pointsDescription of the major demographic populations, providers, andregulatory bodies affected by the selected health care issue, includingthe plan to implement initiatives to address the issue, is complete andincludes explanation and relevant supporting details.3. 3: Satisfactory10.27 pointsDescription of the major demographic populations, providers, andregulatory bodies affected by the selected health care issue, includingthe plan to implement initiatives to address the issue, is included butlacks explanation and relevant supporting details.2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory9.62 pointsDescription of the major demographic populations, providers, andregulatory bodies affected by the selected health care issue, includingthe plan to implement initiatives to address the issue, is incomplete orincorrect.1. 1: Unsatisfactory0 pointsDescription of the major demographic populations, providers, andregulatory bodies affected by the selected health care issue is notincluded.Major Ethical Considerations From Christian WorldviewPerspective (MC3)13 points
9/30/23, 5:41 PMPage 4 of 10about:srcdocCriteria DescriptionMajor Ethical Considerations From Christian Worldview Perspective (MC3)5. 5: Excellent13 pointsDiscussion of the major ethical considerations of the selected health careissue from a Christian worldview perspective, including patient/family,patient care provider, and regulatory body perspectives, is thorough andincludes substantial explanation and relevant supporting details.4. 4: Good11.31 pointsDiscussion of the major ethical considerations of the selected health careissue from a Christian worldview perspective, including patient/family,patient care provider, and regulatory body perspectives, is complete andincludes explanation and relevant supporting details.3. 3: Satisfactory10.27 pointsDiscussion of the major ethical considerations of the selected health careissue from a Christian worldview perspective, including patient/family,patient care provider, and regulatory body perspectives, is included butlacks explanation and relevant supporting details.2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory9.62 pointsDiscussion of the major ethical considerations of the selected health careissue from a Christian worldview perspective, including patient/family,patient care provider, and regulatory body perspectives, is incomplete orincorrect.1. 1: Unsatisfactory0 pointsDiscussion of the major ethical considerations of the selected health careissue from a Christian worldview perspective is not included.Implementation Initiatives and Solutions for Addressing theContemporary Health Care Issue13 points
9/30/23, 5:41 PMPage 5 of 10about:srcdocCriteria DescriptionImplementation Initiatives and Solutions for Addressing the ContemporaryHealth Care Issue5. 5: Excellent13 pointsDiscussion of the implementation initiatives and solutions for addressingthe identified health care issue, including how the minimum number ofrequired solutions meet the needs of identified stakeholders, isthorough and includes substantial explanation and relevant supportingdetails.4. 4: Good11.31 pointsDiscussion of the implementation initiatives and solutions for addressingthe identified health care issue, including how the minimum number ofrequired solutions meet the needs of identified stakeholders, iscomplete and includes explanation and relevant supporting details.3. 3: Satisfactory10.27 pointsDiscussion of the implementation initiatives and solutions for addressingthe identified health care issue, including how the minimum number ofrequired solutions meet the needs of identified stakeholders, is includedbut lacks explanation and relevant supporting details.2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory9.62 pointsDiscussion of the implementation initiatives and solutions for addressingthe identified health care issue, including how the minimum number ofrequired solutions meet the needs of identified stakeholders, isincomplete or incorrect.1. 1: Unsatisfactory0 pointsDiscussion of the implementation initiatives and solutions for addressingthe identified health care issue is not included.Thesis Development and Purpose3.25 points
9/30/23, 5:41 PMPage 6 of 10about:srcdocCriteria DescriptionThesis Development and Purpose5. 5: Excellent3.25 pointsThesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesisstatement makes the purpose of the paper clear.4. 4: Good2.83 pointsThesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis isdescriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to thepurpose.3. 3: Satisfactory2.57 pointsThesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory2.41 pointsThesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.1. 1: Unsatisfactory0 pointsPaper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.Argument Logic and Construction3.25 points
9/30/23, 5:41 PMPage 7 of 10about:srcdocCriteria DescriptionArgument Logic and Construction5. 5: Excellent3.25 pointsClear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in adistinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.4. 4: Good2.83 pointsArgument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation areevident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction toconclusion. Most sources are authoritative.3. 3: Satisfactory2.57 pointsArgument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argumentpresents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but notthoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible.Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory2.41 pointsSufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistentunity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources havequestionable credibility.1. 1: Unsatisfactory0 pointsStatement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusiondoes not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and usesnoncredible sources.Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation,grammar, language use)3.25 points
9/30/23, 5:41 PMPage 8 of 10about:srcdocCriteria DescriptionMechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, languageuse)5. 5: Excellent3.25 pointsWriter is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.4. 4: Good2.83 pointsProse is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may bepresent. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures andfigures of speech.3. 3: Satisfactory2.57 pointsSome mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overlydistracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure andaudience-appropriate language are employed.2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory2.41 pointsFrequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present.Sentence structure is correct but not varied.1. 1: Unsatisfactory0 pointsSurface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication ofmeaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major andassignment)1.95 points
9/30/23, 5:41 PMPage 9 of 10about:srcdocCriteria DescriptionPaper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)5. 5: Excellent1.95 pointsAll format elements are correct.4. 4: Good1.7 pointsTemplate is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.3. 3: Satisfactory1.54 pointsTemplate is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errorsmay be present.2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory1.44 pointsTemplate is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack ofcontrol with formatting is apparent.1. 1: Unsatisfactory0 pointsTemplate is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarelyfollowed correctly.Documentation of Sources1.3 points
9/30/23, 5:41 PMPage 10 of 10about:srcdocCriteria DescriptionDocumentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography,etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)5. 5: Excellent1.3 pointsSources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate toassignment and style, and format is free of error.4. 4: Good1.13 pointsSources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, andformat is mostly correct.3. 3: Satisfactory1.03 pointsSources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style,although some formatting errors may be present.2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory0.96 pointsDocumentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate toassignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.1. 1: Unsatisfactory0 pointsSources are not documented.Total65 points
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
