When a patient is in the end-of-life decision, should food or water be withheld?
This assignment is a video using a Power Point presentation. Videos can be recorded using any software or tool, but all videos are required to be uploaded to My Panopto Videos for assignment submission. Again save as an MP4 file.
Ethical Issues Debate Question: When a patient is in the end-of-life decision, should food or water be withheld?
Position: Against that statement
Once you receive your topic and position, prepare to create a video that will be due in Week 5. Save as an MP4 file otherwise, I will not be able to open it.
The video should be 4-5 minutes long and address the topic and viewpoint you were assigned.
You may not be personally in support or opposition of the topic, however it is your job to convince your peers of your position. Include evidence that supports the viewpoint.
Include an introduction to the issue, your stance, the rationale for the stance, the ethical principals involved, theories and evidence supporting your position, and your proposed resolution. Review the rubric in this forum for complete grading criteria.
Your video should include both audio and visual components such a graphics or charts. You can choose to do a PowerPoint, yourself on video with a poster or visual aids, or anything that supports and convinces your peers of your stance.
Get creative! Be succinct but convincing. If you go over the time limit, you will only be graded on the first 5 minutes.
Assignment Rubric DetailsCloseRubricNURS_510_DE – Ethical Issues Debate Project
NURS_510_DE – Ethical Issues Debate Project
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWeek 5 Video Overall Presentation
20 to >16.4 ptsAccomplished (80-100%)Presentation is well organized and approximately 4-5 minutes in length. Audio is clear and reasonably paced. Visual component compliments audio component. Discussion reflects an atmosphere of mutual respect. 16.4 to >15.0 ptsEmerging (60-79%)Presentation is fairly organized, but there are several areas of improvement. Presentation is less than 4-5 minutes in length and some areas are not addressed. Audio needs some improvements. Visual component needs work. Discussion reflects an atmosphere of mutual respect. 15 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactory (0-59%)Presentation is unorganized and lacks structure. Presentation is extremely limited. Audio is absent or needs significant improvements. Visual component is absent or severely lacking.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWeek 5 Video: Ethical Issues, Concern, & Proposed Resolution
60 to >49.2 ptsAccomplished (80-100%)There is a clear description of the ethical issue including a proposed resolution. The issue topic is a current issue of debate and related to health care. The issue has a clearly defined dilemma with more than one resolution. Ethical principles and theories involved with the ethical issue are clearly identified and explained. 49.2 to >45.0 ptsEmerging (60-79%)Description of the ethical issue, the dilemma, and/or proposed resolution is lacking some details and relevant information. 45 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactory (0-59%)Description of the ethical issue, the dilemma, and/or proposed resolution is absent or severely lacking.
60 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWeek 5 Video: Supporting Argument/Stance
40 to >32.8 ptsAccomplished (80-100%)Supporting argument is well developed either for or against the issue. Factors supporting the stance are well identified. Ethical principles and theories involved with the ethical issue are clearly identified and explained and in alignment with the viewpoint. 32.8 to >30.0 ptsEmerging (60-79%)Proposed resolution supporting your argument is not well defined. Key stakeholders and factors supporting your resolution are not clearly identified. 30 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactory (0-59%)Proposed resolution supporting your argument is absent or ill defined. Key stakeholders and factors supporting your resolution are absent or poorly identified.
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWeek 6 Rebuttal
40 to >32.8 ptsAccomplished (80-100%)Rebuttal to classmate’s post is complete and includes key points including stakeholders, essential factors, and important facts supporting the resolution. The rebuttal reflected an atmosphere of mutual respect. Policy drivers and ethical principles involved are clearly identified and explained in support or opposition of the resolution. 32.8 to >30.0 ptsEmerging (60-79%)Rebuttal to classmate’s post is incomplete and missing some key points regarding stakeholders, essential factors, and important facts supporting the resolution. Policy drivers and ethical principles involved are not clearly identified and explained in support or opposition of the resolution. 30 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactory (0-59%)Rebuttal to classmates’ post is absent or largely incomplete. Key points regarding stakeholders, essential factors, and important facts supporting the resolution are absent or severely lacking. Policy drivers and ethical principles involved and in support or opposition of the resolution are absent or severely lacking.
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWeek 6 Rebuttal: Participation
40 to >32.8 ptsAccomplished (80-100%)The minimum number of postings were met. The student followed netiquette in addition to the posting timeframe to contribute throughout the week. 32.8 to >30.0 ptsEmerging (60-79%)Less than the minimum number of postings were evident. The student mostly followed netiquette and met most of the posting timeframe to contribute throughout the week. 30 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactory (0-59%)There was a severe deficit in contribution. Less than the minimum number of postings were evident. The student did not follow netiquette and did not meet the participation requirements.
40 pts
Total Points: 200
Requirements:
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.