Evaluate the credibility of the source by describing why the source would be viewed as credible by an academic audience.
PART 1: In an effort to develop your annotated bibliography, you should aim to complete the following actions:
Collect annotated sources from previous papers. Previous annotated sources should be included as the foundation of this document. This allows you to enter the assignment with a number of prepared sources that you can add more sources to.
Structure citations for each source according to the citation format you have used for your previous papers.
If you have been using APA formatting, apply APA formatting to the entries and page format of the annotated bibliography.
Develop annotations for each new source and revise annotations for existing sources by conducting the following actions:
Summarize by attempting to answer the following questions: What are the main arguments? What is the point of this book or article? What topics are covered? What would you say if someone asked what this article/book is about?
Assess by attempting to answer the following questions: Is it a valuable source? How does it compare with other sources in your bibliography? Is the information reliable? Is this source biased or objective? What is the goal of this source? For more help, see our handouts on evaluating resources.
Reflect by attempting to answer the following questions: Was this source helpful to you? How does it help you shape your argument? How can you use this source in your research project? Has it changed how you think about your topic?
All annotations must be a minimum of 100 words.
Ensure that each source is followed by an annotation. Annotations must:
Be at least 100 words in length.
Evaluate the credibility of the source by describing why the source would be viewed as credible by an academic audience.
Detail the value of the source by describing how the source is valuable to the thesis of your paper
Include a quote or paraphrase that could be used in the text of the paper, along with in-text citation.
Provide an introduction to the Annotated Bibliography that applies causal analysis techniques to establish the context for the sources. The introduction must:
Introduce the catalyst (inciting incident) for your writing and research. In other words, what major or minor real-world event created or contributed to the problem you want solve.
Describe the impact of the catalyst on the population or region you want your research and writing to help. In other words, what damage has the major or minor real-world event done to the people or place you want to help.
Suggest possible solutions that can be found in your research (sources).
Provide a conclusion to the Annotated Bibliography that applies causal analysis techniques to establish the context for the sources. The conclusion must:
Suggest at least two ways your research can lead to solutions that would improve conditions for the people or place you want to help.
Describe at least two possible positive outcomes for the people or place you want to help, as proof that you are thinking about how your research will offer solutions.
Identify sources that provide the best information to support your proposed solution
PART 2:
ARGUMENTATIVE RESEARCH PAPER
OBJECTIVES
For this assignment, you will be writing an 1800-3000 word (six (6) to ten (10)-page) thesis-driven research paper where you will present an argument based on your prior research that suggests a solution to a current debate on the topic presented in your first paper.
Establish and support an original, restrictive, argumentative thesis that presents a viable solution to an ongoing academic conversation.
The solution and its related thesis should be the culmination of your research and writing to this point. It should combine your subjective point of view on your issue, and it should be rooted in the research you have completed for prior essays.
Employ strategies from prior papers to fully develop your examination of your topic. Use the strategies you employed in each essay to flesh out and fully develop your research paper, including:
Analysis to summarize and analyze the topic and the content, context, audience, and purpose of the sources.
Definition to quantify important terms and abstract concepts at the heart of your topic.
Illustration to select and incorporate examples from your research that support your argument.
Comparison to synthesize, examine, and evaluate multiple sources and perspectives that may apply to your argument.
Causal analysis to chart the origin and of our topic and predict future outcomes.
Argumentation to reveal the fallacies in opposing arguments/perspectives and establish a clear position.
Use at least five (5) sources, three of which must be from any of the PGCC databases.
Focus on conducting academic research using credible sources. Ensure credibility by using peer-reviewed journals, which are commonly accepted as credible sources for academic research.
Apply at least two rhetorical appeals and utilize both inductive and deductive reasoning.
While you will be establishing ethos through your research and writing, you must attempt to apply logos and pathos appeals where necessary. You must use at least one logos appeal, employing either inductive and/or deductive reasoning in your body paragraphs, and you must apply at least one pathos appeal, which may take the form of an illustration that presents a narrative or real-world account.
Refute an opposing argument in an effort to establish your position.
While you will be devoting most of the paper to arguing on behalf of your position and solution, plan to devote a significant component to challenging an opposing argument. Plan to devote at least one paragraph to acknowledging the possible validity and viability of an opposing argument and argue against at least one piece of the opposition’s supporting evidence in the rebuttal paragraph.
STRUCTURE
Apply multiple patterns of development.Each body paragraph should apply an analytical strategy we used throughout the semester. You may ultimately have more than one of each paragraph but you need to use at least one of each. For example, your outline may look like this:
Introduction – introduce the topic and state your solution and thesis
Analytical Summary paragraph(s) – define/describe the current debate over this issue
Comparative Analysis paragraph(s) – compare and evaluate multiple sources and perspectives
Causal Analysis paragraph(s) – describe the issues that created this current issue and describe the effects, if your solution is not applied.
Argument paragraph(s) – state your argument and critical supporting arguments and refute a prominent opposing argument.
Conclusion – summarize and wrap-up
AUDIENCE
The audience for this essay is the entrance committee of a university where you plan to transfer to. You must convince them of the viability of your potential research so that they will grant you acceptance to the university and a scholarship.
STRUCTURE AND FORMATTING REQUIREMENTS
Structure and Formatting Requirements
Number of Sources 5+ academic sources
1+ peer reviewed sources
3 from PGCC library databases
Length 1800-3000 words (must not exceed 3000 words or 10 pages), not including bibliographic information (e.g. Works Cited or References pages)
Point of View (PoV) Third-person preferred; First-person allowed
Spacing Double
Margins 1” (top, bottom, right, and left)
Font Size and Type 12-pt., Times New Roman Font
Citation Format APA
Bibliography Style If using APA: References
Header/Heading/Title Page If using APA: Title page and student-style heading and headers are required.
Requirements:
Money and Happiness: A Critical Analysis
Literature Review Final draft. docs
EGL 1010- Composition 1: Expository writing
September 22, 2023
Introduction
In a world driven by the relentless pursuit of dreams and desires, we often find ourselves at the crossroads of aspiration and contentment. For instance, a lottery winner holding a multimillion-dollar jackpot ticket, standing on the precipice of a life-altering windfall, might not find everlasting joy despite this newfound wealth. This paradoxical trend beckons us to delve deeper, to explore not only the limitations and nuances of the money-happiness relationship but also to fathom how individuals and society navigate the pursuit of happiness in a world where material wealth often takes center stage. By evaluating scholars with convincing research such as: “Does money buy you happiness? Researchers join forces to reveal the answer” from CNN Wire, another one is “Ask an adviser: Will more money make me happier?” by B. Felix in the Globe & Mail, and research titled “Where money seems to talk: Polls, wealth, and happiness” from The Economist. This essay aims to unravel the mysteries surrounding money and happiness and to offer insights and solutions that resonate with the complexity of our ever-changing world. So, whether you are a curious seeker of knowledge or a concerned citizen yearning for understanding, fasten your seatbelt as we explore the age-old debate: Can money buy happiness?
Sources Brief, Compare and Contrast.
The fundamental problem at the heart of this essay is pursuing happiness in a world where material wealth frequently occupies a prominent position. People continually wonder whether accumulating more wealth will lead to a higher level of happiness and satisfaction. This dilemma underscores the need to analyze the arguments presented in these sources critically. Source 1: The first source is “Does money buy you happiness? Researchers join forces to reveal the answer.” CNN Wire, a credible news source, discusses a collaborative research effort to answer whether money can buy happiness (CNN Wire, 2023). The collaboration of the researchers shows evidence and quality of the empirical research lies in an app he created called Track Your Happiness, which reveals that higher incomes generally correlate with increased happiness, except for those who are financially well-off yet unhappy (CNN Wire, 2023). Furthermore, the research evidence revealed that day-to-day happiness rose as annual income increased, but above $75,000, it leveled off, and happiness plateaued. This aligns with the idea that basic needs must be satisfied before wealth significantly impacts one’s pursuit of happiness.
Source 2: Turning our attention to the second source, an article titled “Ask an adviser: Will more money make me happier? Authored by B. Felix, a CFP® professional financial adviser and head of research at PWL Capital, it explores whether increasing one’s wealth will lead to greater happiness. For example, he acknowledges that financial stability is essential for overall well-being, providing security and the ability to meet basic needs. He further proposes that individuals prioritizing financial goals should align with their values and life aspirations rather than mindlessly accumulating wealth (Felix, 2023). Drawing from his extensive background as a financial advisor over several years, this perspective highlights the importance of a balanced approach to wealth and happiness.
Source 3: In contrast, According to The Economist (2007), a newspaper renowned for providing in-depth analysis of global affairs and a writer of an article titled “Where Money Seems to Talk: Polls, wealth, and Happiness.” It Challenges the idea that there is a clear income threshold of $100,000 beyond which more money does not lead to greater happiness, pointing to recent survey data and a study from Gallup’s pollster surveys, which declared a level of happiness correlated with wealth (The Economist,2007). It further delves into the results of polls and surveys on wealth and happiness to emphasize that the correlation between income and satisfaction varies across regions and contexts. Increased revenue is strongly linked to increased happiness in some societies and conversely weaker in others (The Economist,2007). This source emphasizes the need for nuanced analyses considering cultural, social, and economic factors to understand the interplay between money and happiness.
While all three sources acknowledge a correlation between wealth and happiness and highlight the complexities, there is a consensus that the link between money and happiness weakens or even reverses beyond a certain income threshold, with exceptions for those who are financially well-off but unhappy. Moreover, it is crucial to consider the nuances highlighted by these sources to propose a solution to the social problem of whether money can buy happiness. Rather than solely pursuing wealth, individuals should prioritize a balanced approach that encompasses and considers individual circumstances, mindsets, and cultural factors (Felix, 2023). Furthermore, these sources similarities demonstrate the complexity of the money-happiness relationship, with each offering unique insights and potential solutions and collectively suggesting that while money can play a role in happiness, it is not the sole determinant; factors like emotional well-being, mindset, health, and expectations about the future also contribute significantly to overall well-being.
Practical and Beneficial Solution
Finally, as each source contributes valuable insights, Benjamin Felix is the source that provides a practical and beneficial solution to the problem of how money can buy happiness. The author argues that having a healthy relationship with money is vital; still, people should focus on spending their money on things that are important to them and on avoiding debt. He also provides specific tips for spending money to maximize happiness, such as spending money on experiences rather than material possessions, on things that we will enjoy in the future rather than things that we will only appreciate in the present (Felix, 2023). Equally, the solution to the problem lies in promoting financial literacy and encouraging individuals to align their financial goals with their values and aspirations. Moreover, education and awareness programs can empower people to make informed financial decisions, emphasizing balancing financial security and pursuing meaningful life experiences. Additionally, policymakers and businesses can also play a role in creating environments that facilitate well-being. For instance, companies can implement workplace policies that promote work-life balance, mental health, and employee satisfaction rather than focusing solely on monetary incentives. Governments can design social safety nets to meet basic needs, reducing financial stress for vulnerable populations.
In conclusion.
All in all, the question of whether money can buy happiness is a complex and enduring one. Various perspectives on this issue have been explored by analyzing three credible sources. The integration of these sources highlights the need for a nuanced approach that considers individual circumstances, values, and cultural factors when addressing the relationship between wealth and happiness. Ultimately, the solution to this social problem involves promoting financial literacy, encouraging individuals to align their financial goals with their values, and creating environments that prioritize well-being. By taking a holistic approach that recognizes the multi-dimensional nature of happiness, society can move closer to resolving the age-old dilemma of whether money can buy happiness.
References
Does money buy you happiness? Researchers join forces to reveal the answer. (2023,
March 13). CNN Wire, NA.
Felix, B. (2023, August 4). Ask an adviser: Will more money make me happier? Globe &
Mail [Toronto, Canada], B8.
Where money seems to talk: Polls, wealth, and happiness. (2007, July 14). The Economist,
384(8537), 64(US).
Money and Happiness: A Critical Analysis
Money and Happiness: A Critical Analysis SUMMARY FINAL DRAFT. docs
EGL 1010- Composition 1: Expository writing
9/6/23
Money and Happiness: A Critical Analysis
Introduction
At the heart of discussions about wealth and well-being lies a paradox that has captivated philosophers, psychologists, and everyday individuals alike. While conventional wisdom has often suggested that money is not a direct path to happiness, recent findings from the study suggest a shifting narrative. The traditional notion of a limited or even inverse relationship between income and satisfaction is challenged by the data’s indication that a more robust correlation has emerged in the modern era. This report delves into the intricacies of this evolving relationship, drawing on extensive survey data to shed light on how financial status influences happiness; it is essential for the audience of this paper, such as academic readers, potentially students or researchers in fields related to psychology, sociology, economics, or other social sciences to understand the purpose of the paper is to argue that the correlation between income and happiness has strengthened, challenging the idea that money cannot buy happiness.
In other words, the thesis Statement study presents a compelling argument that the association between money and happiness has strengthened over the years, prompting us to reevaluate the simplistic assertion that money cannot buy happiness.
Body
In analyzing the data, the researchers unearthed a distinct trend: the correlation between income and happiness has steadily risen among individuals aged 30 and older. This finding directly challenges the widely accepted belief that the relationship between these two factors is either static or diminishing (Marte, 2016). First, the conventional wisdom that “money cannot buy happiness” is widely accepted and has been supported by earlier studies, such as the well-known 2010 Princeton study (Bahrampour, 2020). This study found that beyond a certain income threshold (approximately $75,000), increasing income did not lead to a proportional increase in happiness. However, the present study, which employed a different methodology and dataset, challenges this belief by suggesting that the income-happiness correlation is significant and strengthening over time. In addition, the research leverages data from the General Social Survey, one of the most comprehensive and longstanding surveys of U.S. adults, spanning over four decades with more than 44,000 participants (Bahrampour, 2020). The data analysis reveals a robust correlation between income and happiness, particularly among individuals aged 30 and older. Also, according to Wharton (2020). Which stated that “In the simplest terms, this suggests that for most people, larger incomes are associated with greater happiness,” says Killingsworth. This finding implies that contrary to previous beliefs, higher income is increasingly associated with greater happiness. The research enhances its credibility by citing this substantial dataset and extensive history.
Second, the data paints a picture of diverging experiences among different racial and educational groups. While the happiness levels of whites without a college education have shown a declining trend since 1972, those of whites with a college education have remained steady (Bahrampour, 2020). A similar pattern was observed among African Americans, where the happiness of those with a college education has increased while their less-educated counterparts have experienced stability. Despite these variations, the common thread lies in the strengthening connection between income and happiness. (Bahrampour, 2020). Moreover, the study acknowledges the influence of societal factors such as rising income inequality, increasing real estate values, and limited access to education in shaping this strengthened connection. This nuanced analysis adds depth to the argument by emphasizing that the changing dynamics between income and happiness are not solely due to individual financial circumstances (Bahrampour, 2020). The study thereby offers a broader perspective, highlighting the complexity of this relationship.
Finally, according to Twenge (2022), the report identifies a growing class divide in happiness, suggesting that factors beyond mere financial well-being influence the impact of income on happiness. So, it is essential to note that the study does not dismiss the value of non-material sources of happiness. While it reveals an increasing income-happiness correlation, it does not suggest that money is the sole determinant of well-being. This balance is crucial to maintain a nuanced view of the issue. Critics such as the Princeton study argue that the study overemphasizes the role of income or that other factors, such as personal relationships and health, are equally or more vital in determining happiness (Bahrampour, 2020). However, the counterargument to the paper’s thesis suggests that the association between money and happiness, while valid, should remain the study’s primary assertion that the relationship between income and happiness is changing. While there is a correlation between income and happiness, it does not necessarily imply causation.
In my opinion, the paper’s thesis and the counterargument have valid points. While it is true that having a certain level of income can provide access to resources and opportunities that contribute to happiness, it is also true that happiness is a multifaceted construct influenced by various factors. Money alone cannot guarantee happiness, but it can undoubtedly enhance well-being when combined with other essential elements of a fulfilling life. Therefore, it is essential to acknowledge the complexity of the relationship between money and happiness rather than adopting a strictly binary perspective. Instead, we should strive for a balanced understanding that recognizes the evolving relationship between income and happiness while valuing the richness of life experiences beyond financial metrics.
Conclusion
All in all, in a world that often extols the virtues of non-materialistic pursuits, the study’s findings invite a reconsideration of the complex interplay between financial circumstances and emotional well-being. The traditional notion that money and happiness exist on opposing ends of a spectrum is challenged by the evolving correlation uncovered by this study. As income inequality rises and economic disparities widen, the study hints at the broader societal factors contributing to the shifting dynamics of happiness. While the research does not negate the importance of non-material content sources, it compels us to recognize that the relationship between money and happiness is far from stagnant.
Bibliography
Bahrampour, T. (2020, July 1). Money can buy happiness, study finds. The Washington Post.
Twenge, J. M., & Cooper, A. B. (2022). The expanding class divide in happiness in the United States, 1972–2016. Emotions 22(4), 701–713.
k
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
