Find two scholarly journal articles (describing original research; not a review paper) on a topic that has been covered in the class so far. The two articles should each explore the sam
Find two scholarly journal articles (describing original research; not a review paper) on a topic that has been covered in the class so far. The two articles should each explore the same topic.Write a thorough, critical synthesis and comparison of the articles. You may use this template to help organize your paper: Article Critique Template Article Critique Template – Alternative FormatsInclude the following sections/information in your paper:
- Introduction, including:
- Article topics
- Rough background of the literature (across the two articles)
- What are the common theoretical frameworks across the two articles? Where do they diverge?
- Research questions and hypotheses
- Briefly compare/contrast the research methods in the two articles, including:
- Research design
- Sample and sampling method
- Identification and measurement of variables
- Study procedures
- Data collection
- Summary of the results for each study (limit yourself to 1-2 paragraphs for each study), including:
- Interpretation of the findings
- Discussion of how the results connect with the research question(s) and hypothesis
- Discussion of what the study means in the big picture (how does it apply to society in general?)
- Critique of each study, including:
- Strengths and weaknesses of the study
- Discussion of possible flaws in the study and how they are connected to the study design
- Discussion of the generalizability of the study (both population and ecological)
- Synthesis of the commonalities and differences in findings/significance of the two studies
- Discussion of recommendations for future research, including:
- Recommendations to address the identified gaps or flaws in the study
- Recommendations that indicate an understanding of research design
- Conclusion, including:
- Summary of the main points of the study
- Summary of the critique and recommendations
- Discussion of how learning theory relates to the research
Running head: ARTICLE CRITIQUE 1
ARTICLE CRITIQUE 2
Article Critique: Fear of Flying
Student Name
Keiser University
Instructor
Course
Date
Article Critique: Fear of Flying
Beauchamp, Greenfield, Campobello (2000) studied how implosion therapy and systematic desensitization affected people with a fear of flying. Their repeated measures study provided treatment for 50 participants, all of whom had significant fears. What follows is a critique of the positive and negative points in this study, as well as what can be taken from the study applied to the field of treatment of fear of flying.
Background of Research
Here is my synopsis of the introduction. What is the researcher’s question? Did they provide adequate reasons for looking at this topic (does it seem important, are they filling a gap in the literature)? What is their hypothesis? Let the reader know the importance of this study.
Summary of Methods
Here is my synopsis of the methods section. Describe the study procedures. Describe the participants (who they are, how they were sampled). Describe the measures (are they measuring the construct well, are they valid and reliable measures). Describe any other significant parts of the study that might lead to confounds to internal validity. Describe the methodology in a way that makes it easy to see how the study was conducted.
Summary of Results and Discussion
Here is my synopsis of the results and discussion section. Describe the researcher’s most important results and how they apply to the big picture.
Critique
Here is where I discuss potential confounds to internal validity and how it affects the confidence in the results. I will also discuss construct validity here (do the research get at the construct they are measuring). If I am relatively confident, I can then discuss external validity and how the study might generalize to others. I will then move on to what the study means in the bigger picture (how does it fit into the area, does it change how society thinks about the problem). I will also describe how I might redo parts of the study if I were to conduct a similar study. (Note: You can also pepper the critique throughout the sections above).
Conclusion
Here is where I would provide a conclusion to the paper.
Reference
Beauchamp, M., Greenfield, M. D., & Campobello, L. (2000). Treatment of flying phobia: Comparative efficacy of two behavioral methods. Journal of Research in Anxiety, 22, 236-252.
,
WEEK 3 Theories of Learning and Motivation
OVERVIEW
• Topic
• Social Cognitive Theory
• Activities
• 1. Discussion: Social Cognitive Theory
• 2. Assignment: Synthesis and Critical Review
Social cognitive theory
•Cognitive psychology studies
mental processes and effects on
behavior
•Cannot provide an adequate
model of personality without
paying attention to what people
are thinking
Observational learning
•Can people learn without
reinforcement?
•Factors:
•Characteristics of model
(status)
•Characteristics of observer
(children, inexperienced)
•Consequences of behavior
observed (reward/punish)
Triadic reciprocal causation
Person: Physical & Cognitive (thinking, memory)
Behavior: Our actions
Environment: Location; How people react to us
Self-Efficacy
➢People’s beliefs in their abilities to exercise some
measure of control over their own functioning and
environmental events
➢Effected by
Mastery experiences (past)
Social modeling (watching others)
Social persuasion (credible)
Physical & Emotional States
➢Determines
What we do
Effort
Resiliency
DISCUSSION BOARD
ARTICLE SYNTHESIS AND CRITICAL REVIEW
• Find two scholarly journal articles (describing original research; not a review paper) on a topic of interest. The two articles should each explore the same topic.
• You may want to select articles that you will use in final paper.
• Write a thorough, critical synthesis and comparison of the articles.
• 1. Introduction
• 2. Briefly compare/contrast the research methods in the two articles
• 3. Summary of the results for each study
• 4. Critique of each study
• 5. Synthesis of the commonalities and differences in findings/significance of the two studies
• 6. Discussion of recommendations for future research
• 7. Conclusion
• This paper should be no more than 7 pages of text, but you are welcome to make it shorter if your writing is thorough but concise.
• Be sure to use APA style, including appropriate grammar, spelling, and mechanics, as well as citations and references.
Note: An original research article includes the first-time report of a research study where the author(s) conducted, including methodology, results and discussion.
Last, but not least…
You may want to begin thinking about and collecting
articles for lit review
➢Article critique & synthesis could include articles you will use for
final paper
➢Rough draft Week 5
- Slide 1: Week 3
- Slide 2: Overview
- Slide 3: Social cognitive theory
- Slide 4: Observational learning
- Slide 5
- Slide 6: Triadic reciprocal causation
- Slide 7: Self-Efficacy
- Slide 8: Discussion Board
- Slide 9: Article Synthesis and Critical Review
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12: Last, but not least…
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
