Interview and Observation Discuss the eight components of SIOP (Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol) with your mentor teacher. Include the following questions in you
Part 1: Interview and Observation
Discuss the eight components of SIOP (Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol) with your mentor teacher. Include the following questions in your discussion:
- What are the English language proficiency levels of the ELL students in your classroom and what other student background information do you take into consideration when preparing lessons?
- How do you determine appropriate content and language objectives? How do you ensure students are not only aware of the objectives, but that your lesson has supported them?
- What are 3-4 strategies you regularly use to support English language learners?
- At least two additional questions of your own to ask your mentor teacher.
Using "Appendix A: SIOP (Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol)," observe at least one lesson involving ELLs and focus on only the first three components: Lesson Preparation, Building Background, and Comprehensible Input.
Part 2: Reflection
In 250-500 words, reflect on the following:
- Suggest ways to enhance the observed lesson in the SIOP components of Lesson Preparation, Building Background, and Comprehensible Input.
- Discuss how the teacher accommodated for different English language proficiency levels.
- Address how what you have learned will be applied to your future professional practice.
Appendix A SIOP (Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol)
Observer(s): Click or tap here to enter text. |
Teacher: Click or tap here to enter text. |
Date: Click or tap here to enter text. |
School: Click or tap here to enter text. |
Grade: Click or tap here to enter text. |
Class/Topic: Click or tap here to enter text. |
ESL Level: Click or tap here to enter text. |
Lesson: Single-Day |
Total Points Possible: 120 (Subtract 4 points for each NA given): Click or tap here to enter text.
Total Points Earned: Click or tap here to enter text. Percentage Score: Click or tap here to enter text.
Directions: Choose the number that best reflects what you observe in a SIOP lesson. You may give a score from 0–4 (or NA on selected items). Cite under “Comments” specific examples of the behaviors observed.
Highly Somewhat Not
Evident Evident Evident
Lesson Preparation
4 3 2 1 0
1. Content objectives clearly defined, displayed, and ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
reviewed with students
2. Language objectives clearly defined, displayed, and ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
reviewed with students
3. Content concepts appropriate for age and educational ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
background level of students
4. Supplementary materials used to a high degree, making ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
the lesson clear and meaningful (e.g., computer programs,
graphs, models, visuals) NA
5. Adaptation of content (e.g., text, assignment) to all levels ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
of student proficiency
6. Meaningful activities that integrate lesson concepts (e.g., surveys, ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
letter writing, simulations, constructing models) with language
practice opportunities for reading, writing, listening, and/or
speaking
Comments: Click or tap here to enter text.
4 3 2 1 0 NA
Building Background
7. Concepts explicitly linked to students’ background experiences ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
8. Links explicitly made between past learning and new concepts ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
9. Key vocabulary emphasized (e.g., introduced, written, repeated, ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐and highlighted for students to see)
Comments: Click or tap here to enter text.
Comprehensible Input
4 3 2 1 0
10. Speech appropriate for students’ proficiency level (e.g., slower ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
rate, enunciation, and simple sentence structure for beginners) ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
11. Clear explanation of academic tasks
12. A variety of techniques used to make content concepts clear ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
(e.g., modeling, visuals, hands-on activities, demonstrations, ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
gestures, body language)
Comments: Click or tap here to enter text.
Strategies
4 3 2 1 0
13. Ample opportunities provided for students to use learning ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
strategies
14. Scaffolding techniques consistently used assisting and ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
supporting student understanding (e.g., think-alouds)
15. A variety of questions or tasks that promote higher-order ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
thinking skills (e.g., literal, analytical, and interpretive questions)
Comments: Click or tap here to enter text.
Interaction
4 3 2 1 0
16. Frequent opportunities for interaction and discussion ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
between teacher/student and among students, which
encourage elaborated responses about lesson concepts
17. Grouping configurations support language and content ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
objectives of the lesson
18. Sufficient wait time for student responses consistently provided ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ NA
19. Ample opportunities for students to clarify key concepts in L1 as ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
needed with aide, peer, or L1 text
Comments: Click or tap here to enter text.
4 3 2 1 0 NA
Practice & Application
20. Hands-on materials and/or manipulatives provided ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
for students to practice using new content knowledge NA
21. Activities provided for students to apply content and ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
language knowledge in the classroom
22. Activities integrate all language skills (i.e., reading, ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
writing, listening, and speaking)
Comments: Click or tap here to enter text.
Lesson Delivery
4 3 2 1 0
23. Content objectives clearly supported by lesson delivery ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
24. Language objectives clearly supported by lesson delivery ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
25. Students engaged approximately 90% to 100% of the period ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
26. Pacing of the lesson appropriate to students’ ability level ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Comments: Click or tap here to enter text.
Review & Assessment
4 3 2 1 0
27. Comprehensive review of key vocabulary ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
28. Comprehensive review of key content concepts ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
29. Regular feedback provided to students on their output ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
(e.g., language, content, work)
30. Assessment of student comprehension and learning of all ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
lesson objectives (e.g., spot checking, group response)
throughout the lesson
Comments: Click or tap here to enter text.
(Reproduction of this material is restricted to use with Echevarría, Vogt, and Short (2017), Making Content Comprehensible for English Learners: The SIOP® Model.)
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.