Select a Speak Up brochure Write a short paper reviewing the brochure.
Paper is no longer than three (3) pages, excluding title page, reference page, and copy of brochure
Due 04/07/2023
Please follow the requirement down below
NR224 RUA Safety Guidelines
Purpose
This assignment increases the students' awareness of the National Patient Safety Goals developed by The Joint Commission. Specifically, this assignment will introduce the Speak Up Initiatives, an award-winning patient safety program designed to help patients promote their own safety by proactively taking charge of their healthcare.
Course outcomes: This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
CO #2: Apply the concepts of health promotion and illness prevention in the laboratory setting. (PO #2)
CO #8: Explain the rationale for selected nursing interventions based upon current nursing literature. (PO #8)
Due date: Your faculty member will inform you when this assignment is due. The Late Assignment Policy applies to this assignment.
Total points possible: 50 points
Preparing the Assignment
1. Follow these guidelines when completing this assignment. Speak with your faculty member if you have questions.
a. Select a Speak Up brochure from The Joint Commission website.
b. Write a short paper reviewing the brochure. Use the Grading Criteria (below) to structure your critique.
c. Include current nursing or healthcare journal article to support your critique.
2. Include the following sections
a. Introduction of brochure (3 points/6%)
i. Includes brochure title
ii. Identifies date published
iii. Describes individuals or groups
iv. Brochure properly cited, included on reference list, and submitted with assignment
b. Summary of article (5 points/ 10%) -brochure citation required
i. Explain the main topics discussed
c. Communication (5 points/10 %) -brochure citation required
i. Review information that promotes communication between patients and healthcare providers
d. Personal Reflection (2 points /4%)
i. Why did this topic interest you?
e. Evaluation of brochure (14 points/28% total (2 points each) (Brochure & nursing article must be cited)
i. Was the information provided in the brochure beneficial? Could you incorporate it in your patient education?
ii. What was done well, and what could have been improved in the brochure?
iii. Was the information presented clearly?
iv. Did current nursing or healthcare related research article support the information presented in the brochure?
v. What population or individuals does this article apply to (i.e., who will benefit the most from this brochure)?
vi. Who else can use this information?
vii. Will this information increase patient safety?
f. Evidence Review & Application (5 points/10% total)
i. Evidence was integrated from a recent (5 years) scholarly nursing journal article to support your answers.
g. Conclusion (5 points/10%)
i. Restates main ideas
ii. Includes supporting information from body of paper
iii. Summarizes the benefits of following the brochure's advice to a person at risk
h. APA style and structure (2 points/4%)
i. Adheres to current APA edition formatting guidelines for title page, margins, in-text citations, and references
ii. Section headers are required
a. Summary of Brochure
b. Patient Communication
c. Personal Reflection
d. Evaluation of Brochure
e. Evidence Review and Application
f. Conclusion
iii. Paper is no longer than three (3) pages, excluding title page, reference page, and copy of brochure
a. Extra pages will not be read or contribute to the assignment grade
i. Clarity of writing (9 points/18%)
i. Proper use of Standard English
ii. Shows original thought
iii. No spelling or grammar errors
iv. Information presented in a logical progression
For writing assistance, visit the Writing Center.
Please note that your instructor may provide you with additional assessments in any form to determine that you fully understand the concepts learned in the review module.
NR283 Pathophysiology
RUA: Pathophysiological Processes Guidelines
NR224 RUA Safety Guidelines
NR283 Pathophysiological Processes Guidelines V2.docx Revised: 04/2018
11
NR224 RUA Safety Guidelines v5 (Nov22) © 2022 Chamberlain University. All rights reserved. 1
Grading Rubric:
Criteria are met when the student’s application of knowledge demonstrates achievement of the outcomes for this assignment.
|
Assignment Section and Required Criteria (Points possible/% of total points available) |
Highest Level of Performance |
High Level of Performance |
Satisfactory Level of Performance |
Unsatisfactory Level of Performance |
Section not present |
|
Introduction of Brochure (3 points/6%) |
3 Points |
2 points |
1 point |
0 points |
|
|
Required Criteria 1. Includes brochure title 2. Identifies date published 3. Describes individuals or groups 4. Brochure properly cited, included on reference list, and submitted with assignment |
Includes no less than 4 required criteria. |
Includes no less than 3 required criterion. |
Includes no less than 2 required criterion. |
Section not present or includes less than 1 criterion |
|
|
Summary of Brochure (5 points/10%) |
5 points |
0 points |
|||
|
Required Criteria 1. Review the main topics |
Includes no less than 1 required criteria. |
Section not present |
|||
|
Patient Communication (5 points/10%) |
5 points |
0 Points |
|||
|
Required Criteria 1. Includes information to promote communication between patients and healthcare providers |
Includes no less than 1 required criteria. |
Section not present. |
|||
|
Personal Reflection (2 points/ 4%) |
2 points |
0 Points |
|||
|
Required Criteria 1. Why did this topic interest you? |
Includes no less than 1 criteria. |
Section not present |
|
Evaluation of Brochure 14 points total—2 points each (14 points/28 %) |
2 points |
0 points |
|
Required Criteria 1. Was the information provided in the brochure beneficial? Could you incorporate it in your patient education? |
Includes no less than 1 criteria. |
Section not present |
|
Required Criteria 1. What was done well, and what could have been improved in the brochure? |
Includes no less than 1 criteria. |
Section not present |
|
Required Criteria 1. Was the information presented clearly? |
Includes no less than 1 criteria. |
Section not present |
|
Required Criteria 1. Did current nursing or healthcare related research support the information presented in the brochure? |
Includes no less than 1 criteria. |
Section not present |
|
Required Criteria 1. What population or individuals does this brochure apply to (i.e., who will benefit the most from this brochure)? |
Includes no less than 1 criteria. |
Section not present |
|
Required Criteria 1. Who else can use this information? |
Includes no less than 1 criteria. |
Section not present |
|
Required Criteria 1. Will this information increase patient safety? |
Includes no less than 1 criteria. |
Section not present |
|
Evidence Review & Application (5 points /10%) |
5 points |
0 points |
|
Required Criteria 1. Evidence from a recent (5 years) scholarly nursing journal article was integrated within the Evaluation of Brochure section to support your answers. |
Includes no less than 1 criteria. |
Does not include criteria |
|
Conclusion (5 points/10%) |
5 points |
4 points |
2 points |
0 points |
|
|
Required criteria 1. Restates main ideas 2. Includes supporting information from body of paper 3. Summarizes the benefits of following the brochure's advice to a person at risk |
Includes no less than 3 required criteria. |
Includes no less than 2 requirements for section. |
Present, yet includes no required criteria. |
Section not present. |
|
|
APA Style and Organization (2 points/4%) |
2 points |
0 points |
|||
|
Required criteria 1. Adheres to current APA edition formatting guidelines for title page, margins, and in-text citations, and references 2. Section headers used a. Summary of Brochure b. Patient Communication c. Personal Reflection d. Evaluation of Brochure e. Evidence Review and Application f. Conclusion 3. Paper is no longer than three (3) pages, excluding title page, reference page, and copy of brochure. a. Extra pages will not be read or contribute to the assignment grade |
Includes all required criteria |
Does not include all required criteria |
|||
|
Clarity of Writing (9 points/18%) |
9 points |
8 points |
7 points |
6 points |
0 points |
|
Required criteria 1. Proper use of Standard English 2. Shows original thought 3. No spelling or grammar errors 4. Information presented in a logical progression |
Includes no less than 4 requirements for section. |
Includes no less than 3 requirements for section, |
Includes no less than 2 requirements for section. |
Includes 1 requirement for section. |
No requirements for this section presented. |
|
Total Points Possible = 50 points |
NR224 RUA Safety Guidelines v5 (Nov22) © 2022 Chamberlain University. All rights reserved. 1
image1.png
image2.png
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
