Criticize the summary stated as ‘summary to be criticized’. Content of critique.? Read the (a) case, (b) theory section related to the case, and (c) the group’s summary. Type up your c

Module 4 – Closing Case. Proposed Merger of Comcast and Time Warner Cable

What do you think are the advantages and disadvantages of Vertical Integration between content producers and distributors?

Advantages:

· Cooperative energies: Vertical integration can make collaborations between the content and dispersion organizations, considering that account cross-advancement and packaged contributions.

· Control: Vertical integration can provide an organization with more relevant command over the content it circulates, allowing it to ensure quality and consistency.

· Cost reserve funds: Vertical integration can decrease costs by taking out the requirement to buy content from outside producers, as well as diminishing conveyance costs. This can result in lower costs for customers.

· Product bundling: Vertical integration allows for offering customers a range of products for a single, combined price. This makes the customers more used to dealing with only one company and its representatives.

· Cross-Selling: A company can take advantage of an established relationship with customers by acquiring different product lines or new categories that it can sell to them.

Disadvantages:

· Diminished advancement: Vertical integration can lessen advancement assuming the organization becomes careless and neglects to enhance because of deficiency of contest.

· Hostile to meaningful way of behaving: Vertical integration can give an organization a lot of force on the lookout, allowing it to take part in cutthroat behavior, for example, inclining toward its own content over rivals or restricting admittance to dispersion channels.

· More exorbitant costs: Vertical integration can result in more exorbitant costs for customers assuming the organization adopts its market potential to increase costs.

Were the two companies above minimum efficient scale? If so, what does that suggest about whether and where they would reap savings from the merger?

The two companies were above the minimum efficiency size, considering they are among the best in their industries. If the merger had been approved, the combined resources would have resulted in an extraordinarily strong competitive position in which to control the industry. The constructive collaboration would allow both companies to realize savings in operational and advertising expenses. The merger of both companies is expected to result in approximately $1.5 billion in savings from operations. There are significant operational cost savings as both companies can begin consolidating resources and sell excess assets. Aside from that, both companies can save significantly on advertising costs as they can advertise the company as a single entity if the merger goes through.

,

The Proposed Merger of Comcast and Time Warner Cable

In February 2014, Comcast and Time Warner announced their intention to merge–a deal worth about $45 billion. The merger would form the largest cable TV and Internet provider in the United States and enable the company to control 27 of the top 30 markets in the United States, and three-fourths of the overall cable market. The merger first had to be approved, however, by the Department of Justice (to assess antitrust concerns) and the Federal Communications Commission (the FCC, which evaluates media deals to assess their influence on the public interest).

Comcast and Time-Warner argued that the deal would not significantly influence competition in the cable industry because the companies operated in nonoverlapping geographic markets, so customers would not be losing an option for getting cable service. They also argued that the merger would enable the companies to make investments that would provide customers with faster broadband, greater network reliability and security, better in-home Wi-Fi, and greater Video on Demand choices. As argued by David Cohen, Comcast’s executive vice president, in front of a Senate panel: “I can make you and the members of this committee one absolute commitment, which is that there is nothing in this transaction that will cause anybody’s cable bills to go up.”

Opponents of the merger, however, argued that the size and scale of the merged company would make the company dangerously powerful (particularly given that Comcast had recently acquired NBC Universal). Whereas the merger might not change the cable options available for end consumers, it definitely would change the options available for content providers such as Disney and Viacom, or on-demand programming providers such as Netflix, Cinema Now, Hulu, and others. The merged company’s overwhelming bargaining power over suppliers could also create cost advantages other TV or Internet providers might be unable to match, thereby enabling it to squeeze competitors out of the market. For example, satellite operator Dish Network argued that the combined company would be able to use its size to force providers of content to lower their prices, and that companies such as Dish Network would be at a competitive disadvantage. Dish also argued that the merged company might undermine video services such as Netflix or Cinema Now by altering streaming speeds either at the “last mile” of the Internet (where it is delivered into people’s homes) or at interconnection points between Internet providers. Netflix noted that Comcast had already required the Netflix to pay “terminating access fees” to ensure that customers did not get a downgraded signal. If the cable companies downgraded the signal for on-demand providers, customers would abandon services like Netflix and turn to on-demand options the cable operators themselves were providing. Senator Al Franken pointed out that when Comcast had acquired NBC Universal in 2010, it had defended that vertical integration move by referring to Time Warner as a fierce competitor. “Comcast can’t have it both ways,” Franken argued. “It can’t say that the existence of competition among distributors, including Time Warner Cable, was a reason to approve the NBC deal in 2010 and then turn around a few years later and say the absence of competition with Time Warner Cable is reason to approve this deal.”

Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers

Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.

Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS

Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?

Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.

We write plagiarism Free Content

Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.

Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.