Students are expected research a current event topic that is
Students are expected research a current event topic that is relevant within the past 5 years and present it to the class. Topics must follow the requirements below and grading will be based on the rubrics. Presentation is worth 30 points and annotated bibliography is worth 20 points. Freestyle – Provide a current event that highlights your personal interests in the EHS field.Current Event Presentation– Create a presentation to be shown in class, which highlights a current event in your field of interest.An acceptable presentation must include a PowerPoint, Google Slides, or other similar type of visual aid, or a prerecorded video created by you, and played in class. A prerecorded video can only be chosen twice for the current events. You must present in person for at least one of them.Please see the rubrics for a grading matrix. Annotated Bibliography – Write an annotated bibliography for your current event article and include any back up articles you used for evidence in your presentation. Students will create a research strategy in order to locate and access needed information. Topics that are found on less-than-credible sources should have references within the article to support the topic. If no references are found in the article, a search for credible sources should be done and annotated as well. If multiple sources are used to confirm the validity of the topic, annotations should be written for each source. Please don’t let this discourage you from topics. Annotations are quick to write. This form, Annotated Bibliography Worksheet.docx can be used to help organize your annotated bibliography. DO NOT FILL OUT FORM AND TURN IN AS ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY. Examples of Annotated BilbliographyAnnotated Bibliography.pdfAnnotated Bibliography 2.pdfPeer Reviews: Complete the rubric for each peer. Add comments for the reviewer in the peer review. Grades will be based on the peer review and comments. Meaningful and helpful critiques are expected. Just leaving ‘good job’ or ‘good topic’ isn’t helpful. Ideas for comments:What did you like most about the presentation?Was the presentation easy to understand?What areas can the presenter improve?Did you stay engaged?RubricCurrent Event Presentation and Annotated Bibliography RubricCurrent Event Presentation and Annotated Bibliography RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVISUAL AIDUse of a visual should be formatted using digital media. Use of other types of supporting visual aids are allowed. Videos not made by you, should be used very sparingly and should be appropriate for class.8.0 to >6.0 ptsFull MarksVisual aid has multiple supporting formats and includes pictures an large text heading with no errors. Using legible font, good contrast of font color and slides are not too busy.6.0 to >4.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsVisual aid has multiple visual support formats to include pictures and large text headings, with few errors. Using legible font, good contrast of font color and slides are not too busy.4.0 to >2.0 ptsBelow ExpectationsVisual aid is text dense or too many graphics, small font size, lacking visual contrast with colors to see clearly. Has multiple spelling and grammatical errors.2.0 to >0 ptsUnacceptableVisual aid is not in digital format; visual aid does not support presentation or is not suitable by color, contrast, text size and font. Has many errors grammatically and in spelling.8.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeORGANIZATIONInformation is organized in to clear sections with an introduction, body and conclusion. Conclusion wraps up topic and reinforces key points.7.0 to >5.0 ptsExceeds ExpectationsInformation is very organized in well- constructed sections to allow flow between an interesting introduction, main ideas and subtopics, and a conclusion reviewing all main ideas.5.0 to >3.5 ptsMeets ExpectationsInformation is organized into sections an interesting introduction, explanation of main ideas and subtopics and a conclusion reviewing all main ideas.3.5 to >2.0 ptsBelow ExpectationsInformation is organized into sections (introduction, main ideas, and conclusion) and information is sporadic2.0 to >0 ptsUnacceptableInformation is not organized into sections, no interesting introduction, information is sporadic.7.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePurposePurpose of the presentation is clear with enthusiasm about the topic. Understanding presenter’s intentions, developing a broad audience understanding and creating subject credibility within the topic.7.0 to >5.0 ptsExceeds ExpectationsDemonstrates strong enthusiasm about topic during entire presentation. Significantly increases audience understanding and knowledge of topic; convinces an audience to recognize the validity and importance of the subject.5.0 to >3.5 ptsMeets ExpectationsShows some enthusiastic feelings about topic. Raises audience understanding and awareness of most points. Provides credibility for the subject.3.5 to >2.0 ptsBelow ExpectationsShows little or mixed feelings about the topic being presented. Raises audience understanding and knowledge of some points. Lacks credibility for topic.2.0 to >0 ptsUnacceptableShows no interest in topic presented. Fails to increase audience understanding of knowledge of topic. No credibility for topic.7.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDELIVERYPresents with confidence, holding eye contact with audience, seems well rehearsed. Use of volume and inflection to maintain interest. Emphasizes key points and is generally engaging.8.0 to >6.0 ptsExceeds ExpectationsHolds attention of entire audience with the use of direct eye contact, seldom looking at notes. Speaks with fluctuation in volume and inflection to maintain audience interest and emphasize key points.6.0 to >4.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsConsistent use of direct eye contact with audience, but still returns to notes. Speaks with satisfactory variation of volume and inflection.4.0 to >2.0 ptsBelow ExpectationsDisplays minimal eye contact with audience, while reading mostly from the notes. Speaks in uneven volume with little or no inflection.2.0 to >0 ptsUnacceptableHolds no eye contact with audience, as entire report is read from notes. Speaks in low volume and/ or monotonous tone, which causes audience to disengage8.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Fluency of AnnotationsAnnotations should be thoughtful and developed to drive the idea behind use of the source. Complete sentences with proper spelling and grammar use.5.0 to >3.0 ptsExceeds ExpectationsAnnotations are well thought out, complete and well written. Full sentences are used, with no spelling or grammatical errors. Annotation flows between sentences.3.0 to >2.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsAnnotations are complete and well written. Full sentences are used, with one or two spelling or grammatical errors. Annotation flows between sentences.2.0 to >1.0 ptsBelow ExpectationsSome annotations are lacking in completeness, thought, and or writing quality. Multiple spelling and grammatical errors. Sentences are incomplete or information does not flow between sentences.1.0 to >0 ptsUnacceptableMost or all annotations are lacking in completeness, thought and writing quality. Many errors in spelling and grammar.5.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCREDIBILITYCan the source(s) be considered reliable and trustworthy?10.0 to >7.5 ptsMeets ExpectationsMultiple sources are used to support topic. All sources are reliable and trustworthy.7.5 to >4.5 ptsBelow ExpectationsOnly one source was used; If using multiple sources, at least one, but not all of the sources are credible and trustworthy.4.5 to >0 ptsUnacceptableNone of the sources are reliable and trustworthy.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Formatting of Annotative BibliographyCitations are formatted in APA format with proper page layout, font size and font type.5.0 to >3.0 ptsExceeds ExpectationsCitations are in APA format with no errors. Correct page layout, proper 12 point font size and Times New Roman font type. Margins are spaced correctly.3.0 to >2.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsThere are few errors in APA format. Correct page layout with proper 12 pt font size and Times New Roman font type. Proper use of margins.2.0 to >1.0 ptsBelow ExpectationsMany errors in font size, type and APA format.1.0 to >0 ptsUnacceptableNot in APA format.5.0 ptsTotal Points: 50.0
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
