Assigned substance-related and addictive disorder: Alcohol-Related
Assigned substance-related and addictive disorder: Alcohol-Related Disorders
Post:
- Explain the diagnostic criteria for your assigned substance-related and addictive disorder.
- Explain the evidenced-based psychotherapy and psychopharmacologic treatment for your assigned substance-related and addictive disorder.
- Describe clinical features that you would expect to observe in a client that may have the substance-related and addictive disorder you were assigned. Align the clinical features with the DSM-5 criteria.
- Support your rationale with references to the Learning Resources or other academic resources.
- Note: Support your rationale with a minimum of three academic resources less than five years In APA Format, Including introduction and conclusion.
12/21/2020 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033609_1 1/4
Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Outstanding Performance
Excellent Performance
Competent Performance
Pro�cient Performance
Room for Improvement
Main Posting: Response to the discusion question is re�ecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
44 (44%) – 44 (44%)
* Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s) *is re�ective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. * supported by at least 3 current, credible sources
40 (40%) – 43 (43%)
* Responds to the discussion question(s) *is re�ective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth * supported by at least 3 credible references
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
* Responds to most of the discussion question(s) *is somewhat re�ective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * 50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth * supported by at least 3 credible references
31 (31%) – 34 (34%)
* Responds to some of the discussion question(s) * one to two criteria are not addressed or are super�cially addressed *is somewhat lacking re�ection and critical analysis and synthesis *somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references
0 (0%) – 30 (30%)
* Does not respond to the discussion question(s) * lacks depth or super�cially addresses criteria *lacks re�ection and critical analysis and synthesis *does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * contains only 1 or no credible references
Name: NRNP_6670_Week4_Discussion_Rubric EXIT
Grid View List View
12/21/2020 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033609_1 2/4
Outstanding Performance
Excellent Performance
Competent Performance
Pro�cient Performance
Room for Improvement
Main Posting: Writing
6 (6%) – 6 (6%) * Written clearly and concisely * Contains no grammatical or spelling errors * Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
* Written clearly and concisely * May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error * Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
5 (5%) – 5 (5%) * Written concisely * May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error * Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)
*Written somewhat concisely * May contain more than two2 spelling or grammatical errors * Contains some APA formatting errors
0 (0%) – 4 (4%) * Not written clearly or concisely * Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors * Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style
Main Posting: Timely and full participation
10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
* meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts main discussion by due date
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) * does not meet requirement for full participation
First Reponse Post to colleague's main post that is re�ective and justi�ed with credible sources.
9 (9%) – 9 (9%) * response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty * the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives
8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)
* response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings
7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)
* response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting
6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)
* response is on topic, may have some depth
0 (0%) – 6 (6%) * response may not be on topic, lacks depth
12/21/2020 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033609_1 3/4
Outstanding Performance
Excellent Performance
Competent Performance
Pro�cient Performance
Room for Improvement
First Reponse: Writing
6 (6%) – 6 (6%) * Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is e�ectively written in Standard Edited English
5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
* Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is e�ectively written in Standard Edited English
5 (5%) – 5 (5%) * Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed * Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources * Response is written in Standard Edited English
4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)
* Responses posted in the discussion may lack e�ective professional communication * Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed * Few or no credible sources are cited
0 (0%) – 4 (4%) * Responses posted in the discussion lack e�ective * Response to faculty questions are missing * No credible sources are cited
First Reponse: Timely and full participation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%) * meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts by due date
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) * does not meet requirement for full participation
Second Reponse: Post to colleague's main post that is re�ective and justi�ed with credible sources.
9 (9%) – 9 (9%) * response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty * the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives
8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)
* response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings
7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)
* response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting
6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)
* response is on topic, may have some depth
0 (0%) – 6 (6%) * response may not be on topic, lacks depth
12/21/2020 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033609_1 4/4
Outstanding Performance
Excellent Performance
Competent Performance
Pro�cient Performance
Room for Improvement
Second Reponse: Writing
6 (6%) – 6 (6%) * Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is e�ectively written in Standard Edited English
5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
* Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is e�ectively written in Standard Edited English
5 (5%) – 5 (5%) * Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed * Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources * Response is written in Standard Edited English
4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)
* Responses posted in the discussion may lack e�ective professional communication * Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed * Few or no credible sources are cited
0 (0%) – 4 (4%) * Responses posted in the discussion lack e�ective * Response to faculty questions are missing * No credible sources are cited
Second Reponse: Timely and full participation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%) * meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts by due date
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) * does not meet requirement for full participation
Total Points: 100
Name: NRNP_6670_Week4_Discussion_Rubric
EXIT
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
