Which of the following is not an element of negligence?
Question 1 Which of the following is not an element of negligence?
Question options:
Duty of reasonable care.
Breach of duty.
Causation.
Proximate cause.
All of the above are negligence elements.
Question 2 Under common law negligence, reasonable care is defined by
Question options:
Experience.
Statute.
The reasonable person standard.
The judge’s preference.
None of the above.
Question 3 When a victim has a peculiar health condition that is reasonably foreseeable, and the tortfeasor injures the victim, the courts call this
Question options:
None of the above.
Taking the victim as you leave him.
Taking the victim as you find him.
Proximate cause.
Res ipsa loquitur.
Question 4 In which type(s) of cases would res ipsa loquitur most commonly be used?
Question options:
None of the above.
All of the above.
Slip-and-fall cases.
Motor vehicle accidents.
Medical malpractice.
Question 5 Proximate cause is best defined as
Question options:
The tortfeasor’s actions that cause a reasonably foreseeable injury to the victim.
The tortfeasor’s actions were a substantial factor in producing the victim’s injuries.
The tortfeasor intended to cause the victim’s injuries.
But for the tortfeasor’s actions, the victim would not have been harmed.
Question 6 Proximate cause is sometimes called
Question options:
Res ipsa loquitur.
Legal cause.
The law of cause and effect.
Strict liability.
Question 7 Foreseeable plaintiff’s theory asks
Question options:
Did the tortfeasor intend to injure the plaintiff?
Was it reasonably foreseeable that the person hurt would be injured as a result of the tortfeasor’s actions?
Should the tortfeasor have known that his or her actions would cause a specific type of injury?
This concept applies to intentional torts, not negligence.
None of the above.
Question 8
Compensatory damages are commonly awarded in negligence cases.
Question options:
True
False
Question 9 The following might be examples of medical malpractice:
Question options:
C and D only.
All of the above.
Abandonment.
Failure to diagnose.
Lack of informed consent.
Question 10 Substantial factor analysis states
Question options:
To set the plaintiff’s damages, the court considers how substantially the victim was hurt and how much of a factor the defendant played in causing the harm.
The tortfeasor is liable for injuries to the victim when the tortfeasor’s actions were a substantial factor in producing the harm.
The tortfeasor did not intend to cause the injuries.
The tortfeasor is liable for injuries to the victim if the tortfeasor reasonably should have known that his or her actions would cause injuries.
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
