MSN 601 & MSN 603: Nursing Licensure and Regulation
Compare and contrast two (2) Nurse Practice Acts addressing the following:
a) Identify each state
b) Outline the APRN Title
c) Discuss the APRN Scope of Practice including prescriptive authority
d) List the APRN education requirements
e) Describe required national certification
Let’s explore the NCSBN Consensus Model. Use the Implementation Status link on the NCSBN Consensus Model website to review the following information.
a) Identify the goal of the NCSBN Consensus Model.
b) How does your state’s Nurse Practice Act compare to the NCSBN Consensus Model?
c) Which states are in full compliance with the Consensus Model?
d) Which states are the least compliant?
e) What are the educational requirements identified by the NCSBN Consensus Model for all APRNs?
f) How does the educational requirements at NKU compare with those identified in the NCSBN Consensus Model for APRNs?
|
Discussion Board Rubric (MSN 601 & MSN 603) |
||
|
Discussion Board Rubric (MSN 601 & MSN 603) |
||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
Integration of Assigned Reading Assignment and Professional Resources view longer description |
10 to >9.8 pts Excellent Discussions show evidence of knowledge and understanding of reading assignment and applicability of professional resources. The initial post must include application of the reading assignment, which includes the textbook and at least one other source from the assigned lecture materials. In addition, the initial post must include at least one other professional resource (i.e. other peer reviewed resources beyond the assigned readings that extend the learning). Each item/question for the initial post and responses to peers include at least one reference citation. 9.8 to >8.4 pts Satisfactory Discussions show evidence of knowledge and understanding of reading assignment and applicability to professional resources. The initial post must include application of the reading assignment, which includes the textbook and at least one other source from the assigned lecture materials. Each item/question for the initial post and responses to peers include at least one reference citation. 8.4 to >7.7 pts Needs Improvement Discussions show little evidence of knowledge and understanding of reading assignment and applicability to professional resources. Not all items/questions are supported with references. 7.7 to >0 pts Poor Performance Discussions show no evidence of knowledge and understanding of reading assignment and applicability to professional resources. Items are not supported with references. Comments Including a wider variety of literature citations would strengthen your responses, but you are on track. |
10 pts |
|
Responses to Other Students and Instructor view longer description |
10 to >9.8 pts Excellent Student responds to the posted questions for the initial post and responses to peers with substantial, thoughtful ideas, clearly communicates ideas or opinions, and poses at least one additional question to deepen the discussion. 9.8 to >8.4 pts Satisfactory Student responds to the posted questions for the initial post and responses to peers with thoughtful ideas and clearly communicates his or her ideas or opinions and poses at least one additional question to deepen the discussion. 8.4 to >7.7 pts Needs Improvement Student responds to the posted questions for the initial post and/or responses to peers in a way that does not clearly indicate deep thought or original ideas or opinions. 7.7 to >0 pts Poor Performance Student responds to the posted questions and/or responses to peers but misses the main idea of the session or discussion. OR Student does not submit initial post and/or responses to peers. Comments On the right track. Responses would be strengthened if they were more thorough. |
10 pts |
|
Utilizes Professional Language view longer description |
10 to >9.8 pts Excellent Initial post and responses to peers consistently show appropriate, professional vocabulary and writing style. 9.8 to >8.4 pts Satisfactory Initial post and responses to peers usually show appropriate, professional vocabulary and writing style. 8.4 to >7.7 pts Needs Improvement Initial post and responses to peers often include inappropriate vocabulary and writing style. 7.7 to >0 pts Poor Performance Initial post and responses to peers consistently show inappropriate vocabulary and writing style. |
10 pts |
|
Ensures Timeliness of Discussion view longer description |
10 to >9.8 pts Excellent Student posted initial (first) response on time by 11:59 PM EST on Thursday and responded to at least one peer’s initial post on an additional day by 11:59 PM EST on Sunday night. 9.8 to >8.4 pts Satisfactory Student posted initial response on time but posted the peer response on the same day as the initial response rather than participating in the discussion on another or other days as required. 8.4 to >7.7 pts Needs Improvement Student posted initial response late and posted peer response. OR Student posted initial response on time but did not post a peer response. 7.7 to >0 pts Poor Performance Student did not post initial response on time and did not post peer response. |
10 pts |
|
Grammar, Syntax, APA Format view longer description |
10 to >9.8 pts Excellent No errors in grammar, spelling or punctuation with overall application of APA format including citations and references. 9.8 to >8.4 pts Satisfactory Minimal errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling with overall application of APA format including citations and references. 8.4 to >7.7 pts Needs Improvement Multiple errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling with below average application of APA format, i.e. minimal citations and many errors in APA format. 7.7 to >0 pts Poor Performance Excessive errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling with no evidence of APA format…i.e. no citations or references. Comments See comments below |
10 pts |
|
|
||
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
