Interpretation of Common Diagnostic Labs in Pediatric Primary Care
Interpretation of Common Diagnostic Labs in Pediatric Primary Care
Interpretation of Common Diagnostic Labs in Pediatric Primary Care
No plagiarism Please. Template will need references and intext citations.
Please read instructions carefully to ensure maximum grade.
Applying Current Evidence Based Practice Guidelines
Assignment: Interpretation of Common Diagnostic Labs in Pediatric Primary Care
Nurse practitioners routinely order labs for a variety of reasons. Some labs are recommended as part of a certain wellness check. Some labs are tested at birth and repeated at regular intervals. Many labs are ordered to rule in or rule out a diagnosis or just to add to an objective data base along with physical examination, vital signs, image studies, etc. Some of the labs can be done at the point of care (POC) such as an Accu-Check®. Most all labs require a venous blood sample but may require different additives that are in the collection tube. Other samples include arterial blood, urine, sputum, spinal fluid, or exudate.
ORDER COMPREHENSIVE SOLUTION PAPERS ON Interpretation of Common Diagnostic Labs in Pediatric Primary Care
You will find the “Unit 7 Assignment Template” that you will use to complete this Assignment. It is organized to include information about a common lab test that you will be completing in pediatric primary care.
Please fill in the requested information.
Assignment Rubric
| Unit 7 Assignment Rubric. Refer to the Assignment directions for specific content requirements. | |||||||
| Instructors: Enter total available points in cell H2, and values between 0 and 4 in the yellow cells in the Score column. Total available points = | 55 | ||||||
| Content Rubric | Introductory | Emergent | Practiced | Proficient/Mastered | Score | Weight | Final Score |
| 0–1.9 | 2–2.9 | 3–3.9 | 4 | ||||
| Content Quality | Student successfully completes less than 55% of the Common Pediatric Diagnostic Labs template. Chart data contains minor and/or major errors, and data may not follow current guidelines. | Student successfully completes 55–75% of the Common Pediatric Diagnostic Labs template. Chart data contains minor errors and no more than one major error. Data follows current guidelines. | Student successfully completes 76–97% of the Common Pediatric Diagnostic Labs template. Chart data may contain a few minor errors, and follows current guidelines. | Student successfully completes 98–100% of the Common Pediatric Diagnostic Labs template. Chart data is accurate with current guidelines. | 90% | 0.00 | |
| Resources | Does not include any resources (0) or sources utilized are not relevant and credible sources of information (1). | Most sources utilized are not relevant and/or credible. | Supports most opinions and ideas with relevant and credible sources. | Supports all opinions and ideas with relevant and credible sources of information. | 10% | 0.00 | |
| Content Score | 0 | ||||||
| Writing Deduction Rubric | Introductory | Emergent | Practiced | Proficient/Mastered | Score | Weight | Final Score |
| 0–1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||||
| Grammar & Punctuation | The overall meaning of the paper is difficult to understand. Sentence structure, subject verb agreement errors, missing prepositions, and missing punctuation make finding meaning difficult. | Several confusing sentences or one to two confusing paragraphs make understanding parts of the paper difficult, but the overall paper meaning is clear. Many subject verb agreement errors, run-on sentences, etc. cause confusion. | A few confusing sentences make it difficult to understand a small portion of the paper. However, the overall meaning of a paragraph and the paper are intact. There may be a few subject verb agreement errors or some missing punctuation. | There are one or two confusing sentences, but the overall sentence and paragraph meanings are clear. There are a few minor punctuation errors such as comma splices or run-on sentences. | 35% | 0.00 | |
| Spelling | The many misspelled words and incorrect word choices significantly interfere with the readability. | Many typos, misspelled words, or the use of incorrect words making understanding difficult in a few places. | Some misspelled words or the misuse of words such as confusing then/than. However, intent is still clear. | A few misspelled words normally caught by spellcheckers are present but do not significantly interfere with the overall readability of the paper. | 35% | 0.00 | |
| Order of Ideas & Length Requirement | Paper has some good information or research, but it does not follow assignment directions and is lacking in overall organization and content. | The order of information is confusing in several places and this organization interferes with the meaning or intent of the paper. However, the paper has a generally discernible purpose and follows assignment directions overall. | The order of information is confusing in a few places and the lack of organization interferes with the meaning or intent of the paper in a minor way. | The overall order of the information is clear and contributes to the meaning of assignment. There is one paragraph or a sentence or two that are out of place or other minor organizational issues. A few sentences may be long and hard to understand. Meets length requirements. | 20% | 0.00 | |
| APA | There is some attempt at APA formatting and citing. There are one or more missing parts such as the cover page or references list. Citation information may be missing. Citation mistakes make authorship unclear. | There is an attempt to use APA formatting and citing. There are both in-text citations and reference listings. Citation information may be missing or incorrect (i.e., websites listed as in-text or reference citations). There is an attempt to cite all outside sources in at least one place. Authorship is generally clear. | There is an overall attempt at APA formatting and citation style. All sources appear to have some form of citation both in the text and on a reference list. There are some formatting and citation errors. Citations generally make authorship clear. | There is a strong attempt to cite all sources using APA style. Minor paper formatting errors such as a misplaced running head or margins may occur. Minor in-text citation errors such as a missing page number or a misplaced date may occur. Quotation marks and citations make authorship clear. | 10% | 0.00 | |
| Writing Deduction | 0.00 | ||||||
| Final Score | 0.00 | ||||||
| Percentage | 0.00% | ||||||
| Feedback: |
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
