Role Of Cultural Identity
Order Instructions
Watch this YouTube Video (Links to an external site.)
(https://youtu.be/IqFrszJ6iP8)
and then complete the sections of the Cultural Formulation Interview (it is attached below) Download Cultural Formulation) Interview as if you had conducted the interview. Alternatively, you may interview another person as long as you do a thorough interview. You will then write a 3-page report of your assessment. The components of the assessment report are as follows.
Note: The CFI is intended as a guide to cultural assessment and should be used flexibly to maintain a natural flow of the interview and rapport with the individual. Follow-up questions may be needed to clarify individuals’ answers. Questions may be rephrased as needed.
Summarize content of interview in each of the 4 sections {not necessary to provide a transcript of the interview}.
Cultural Definition of the Problem
Cultural Perceptions Of Cause, Context, And Support
Stressors And Supports
Role Of Cultural Identity
Cultural Factors Affecting Self-Coping And Past Help Seeking
Cultural Factors Affecting Self-Coping And Past Help Seeking
Self-Coping
Past Help-Seeking
Barriers
Cultural Factors Affecting Current Help Seeking
Preferences
Clinician-Patient Relationship
Overall Cultural Assessment: Implications
Psychosocial stressors and cultural features of vulnerability and resilience:
Identify key stressors and supports in the individual’s social environment (which may include both local and distant events) and the role of religion, family, and other social networks (e.g., friends, neighbors, coworkers) in providing emotional, instrumental, and informational support. Social stressors and social supports vary with cultural interpretations of events, family structure, developmental tasks, and social context. Levels of functioning, disability, and resilience should be assessed in light of the individual’s cultural reference groups.
Cultural features of the relationship between the individual and the clinician:
Identify differences in culture, language, and social status between an individual and clinician that may cause difficulties in communication and may influence diagnosis and treatment. Experiences of racism and discrimination in the larger society may impede establishing trust and safety in the clinical diagnostic encounter. Effects may include problems eliciting symptoms, misunderstanding of the cultural and clinical significance of symptoms and behaviors, and difficulty establishing or maintaining the rapport needed for an effective clinical alliance.
Reaction of the client and interviewer to the process and questions
Provide the general reaction of the client to the process and provide examples of 2-3 reactions to specific questions.
Describe your experience doing the interview and your opinion on the clinical utility of the interview.
Provide specific examples to support your opinions.
Rubric
Cultural Formulation Rubric
Cultural Formulation Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeC1D44L01
Writing or behavior displays acceptance of the values of service, social justice, dignity and worth of the individual, integrity, importance of interpersonal relationships, and competence
threshold: 3.0 pts
5 pts
Exceptional
4 pts
Exceeds Standard
3 pts
Meets Standard
2 pts
Approaching Standard
1 pts
Does Not Meet Standard
0 pts
Insufficient Information
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeC1D46L02
Demonstrates ability to use reflection (meta-cognition) to process ethical ethical standards in the course of ethical decision making
threshold: 3.0 pts
5 pts
Exceptional
4 pts
Exceeds Standard
3 pts
Meets Standard
2 pts
Approaching Standard
1 pts
Does Not Meet Standard
0 pts
Insufficient Information
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeC3D54L01
Assertively expresses that an individual’s or a population’s position in society, should not hinder fundamental human rights (i.e., freedom, safety, privacy, an adequate standard of living, health care, and education).
threshold: 3.0 pts
5 pts
Exceptional
4 pts
Exceeds Standard
3 pts
Meets Standard
2 pts
Approaching Standard
1 pts
Does Not Meet Standard
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeC3D54L02
Expresses a conviction that having a mental illnesses should not hinder fundamental human rights (i.e., freedom, safety, privacy, an adequate standard of living, health care, and education).
threshold: 3.0 pts
5 pts
Exceptional
4 pts
Exceeds Standard
3 pts
Meets Standard
2 pts
Approaching Standard
1 pts
Does Not Meet Standard
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeC7D65L01
Demonstrates ability to accurately assess individuals, groups, organizations or communities
threshold: 3.0 pts
5 pts
Exceptional
4 pts
Exceeds Standard
3 pts
Meets Standard
2 pts
Approaching Standard
1 pts
Does Not Meet Standard
0 pts
Insufficient Information
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeC7D66L01
Demonstrates capacity to make evidence-informed recommendations for assessment tools or strategies for assessing individuals, families, communities, or larger systems.
threshold: 3.0 pts
5 pts
Exceptional
4 pts
Exceeds Standard
3 pts
Meets Standard
2 pts
Approaching Standard
1 pts
Does Not Meet Standard
0 pts
Insufficient Information
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeC7D67L01
Demonstrates ability to use theory to formulate hypotheses that guide assessment decisions
threshold: 3.0 pts
5 pts
Exceptional
4 pts
Exceeds Standard
3 pts
Meets Standard
2 pts
Approaching Standard
1 pts
Does Not Meet Standard
0 pts
Insufficient Information
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeC7D67L02
Demonstrates ability to critically evaluate assessment literature and make informed decisions about assessment methods or assessment instrument choices
threshold: 3.0 pts
5 pts
Exceptional
4 pts
Exceeds Standard
3 pts
Meets Standard
2 pts
Approaching Standard
1 pts
Does Not Meet Standard
0 pts
Insufficient Information
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeC7D68L01
Shows ability to identify ways in which structural issues may confound validity of assessment
threshold: 3.0 pts
5 pts
Exceptional
4 pts
Exceeds Standard
3 pts
Meets Standard
2 pts
Approaching Standard
1 pts
Does Not Meet Standard
0 pts
Insufficient Information
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeC7D68L02
Shows ability to account for the contribution systemic issues may have on assessment conclusions (e.g., diagnosis, causes of behavior, or problems)
threshold: 3.0 pts
5 pts
Exceptional
4 pts
Exceeds Standard
3 pts
Meets Standard
2 pts
Approaching Standard
1 pts
Does Not Meet Standard
0 pts
Insufficient Information
5 pts
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
