Sociologic Sciences Interactive Case Study?(Links to an external site.)Complete the Sociologic Sciences Interactive Case Study following the readings and presentation for this week
Sociologic Sciences Interactive Case Study (Links to an external site.)Complete the Sociologic Sciences Interactive Case Study following the readings and presentation for this week. Associate what you have learned about the theories to this case study, and then see the instructions below to complete a journal entry about your experience.
Each time you have completed a case study, submit your reflection. Each reflection should include the following:
- A comparison of what you have learned from the case study to related theories you have studied. Make sure to cite these theories in APA format.
- A comparison of the case study to your nursing practice, giving one or two examples from your nursing experience in which you might have applied a particular theory covered.
Your reflection should be a minimum of five paragraphs.
RUBRIC ATTACHED, PLEASE FOLLOW RUBRIC AND INSTRUCTIONS
DUE DATE SEPTEMBER 28, 2022
OC_NURS500_202209FAIO… Assignments Week 4 Sociologic Sciences …! Immersive Reader
Total Points: 50
Week 4 Sociologic Sciences Journal
Due Sunday by 11:59pm Points 50 Submi!ng a text entry box or a file upload
NURS_500_DE – Case Study Rubric
Criteria Ra"ngs Pts
20 pts
20 pts
7.5 pts
2.5 pts
Start Assignment
Sociologic Sciences Interac!ve Case Study Complete the Sociologic Sciences Interac!ve Case Study following the readings and presenta!on for this week. Associate what you have learned about the theories to this case study, and then see the instruc!ons below to complete a journal entry about your experience.
During weeks 2 & 4, you will complete interac!ve case studies and be asked to associate what you have learned about theory in comparison to the case study and reflect on it.
Each !me you have completed a case study, submit your reflec!on. Each reflec!on should include the following:
A comparison of what you have learned from the case study to related theories you have studied. Make sure to cite these theories in APA format. A comparison of the case study to your nursing prac!ce, giving one or two examples from your nursing experience in which you might have applied a par!cular theory covered.
Your reflec!on should be a minimum of five to six paragraphs.
Cri!cal Analysis
20 to >16.4 pts Meets Expecta"ons
Presents an exemplary ar!cula!on and insigh"ul analysis of significant concepts and/or theories presented in the case. Offers detailed and specific examples for all ques!ons. Makes keen observa!ons, making note of essen!al informa!on provided in the case. Ideas are professionally sound and crea!ve; they are supported by scien!fic evidence that is credible and !mely. Draws insigh"ul and comprehensive conclusions and solu!ons.
16.4 to >15.0 pts Approaches Expecta"ons
Presents an accurate analysis of significant concepts and/or theories presented in the case. Offers some detail and some examples for most ques!ons. Makes occasional note of essen!al informa!on provided in the case. Ideas are mostly supported by scien!fic evidence that is credible and !mely. Makes some a$empt to draw conclusions and solu!ons.
15 to >11.8 pts Falls Below Expecta"ons
Provides insufficient explana!ons of significant concepts. Offers li$le or insignificant detail and no examples for most ques!ons. Fails to address essen!al informa!on provided in the case. Ideas are generally unsupported by scien!fic evidence, but some a$empt has been made. Fails to draw conclusion.
11.8 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expecta"ons
Does not, or incorrectly, answers with insufficient explana!ons. Informa!on is not scien!fically sound.
Content 20 to >16.4 pts Meets Expecta"ons
Makes insigh"ul, clear and accurate connec!ons to key concepts and relevant theories. Response indicates a comprehensive, high-level understanding of the concepts presented in the case.
16.4 to >15.0 pts Approaches Expecta"ons
Makes mostly accurate connec!ons to key concepts and relevant theories. Response indicates a general understanding of the concepts presented in the case.
15 to >11.8 pts Falls Below Expecta"ons
Provides several insufficient or inaccurate explana!ons, although a$empts are made to address some key concepts. Response indicates an introductory understanding of the concepts presented in the case.
11.8 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expecta"ons
Informa!on is inaccurate or inadequate. Response indicates li$le or no understanding of the concepts presented in the case.
Mechanics 7.5 to >6.15 pts Meets Expecta"ons
Answers are well wri$en throughout. Informa!on is well organized and clearly communicated. Assignment is free of spelling and gramma!cal errors.
6.15 to >5.63 pts Approaches Expecta"ons
Answers are well wri$en throughout and the informa!on is reasonably organized and communicated. Assignment is mostly free of spelling and gramma!cal errors.
5.63 to >4.43 pts Falls Below Expecta"ons
Answers are somewhat organized and lacks some clarity. Contains some spelling and gramma!cal errors.
4.43 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expecta"ons
Answers are not well wri$en and lack clarity. Informa!on is poorly organized. Assignment contains many spelling and gramma!cal errors.
APA Format
2.5 to >2.05 pts Meets Expecta"ons
Follows all the requirements related to format, length, source cita!ons, and layout.
2.05 to >1.88 pts Approaches Expecta"ons
Follows length requirement and most of the requirements related to format, source cita!ons, and layout.
1.88 to >1.48 pts Falls Below Expecta"ons
Follows most of the requirements related to format, length, source cita!ons, and layout.
1.48 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expecta"ons
Does not follow format, length, source cita!ons, and layout requirements.
"Previous Next#
WCU_202209FAIOL
Home
Announcements
Syllabus
VitalSource E-Text
Modules
Assignments
Discussions
Grades
My Panopto Videos
Zoom
Tutor.com
Course Evalua!ons
WCU Library
Remind
Chat with Gabby
Account
Dashboard
Courses
Calendar
Inbox
History
Studio
Help
,
OC_NURS500_202209FAIO… Assignments Week 4 Sociologic Sciences …! Immersive Reader
Total Points: 50
Week 4 Sociologic Sciences Journal
Due Sunday by 11:59pm Points 50 Submi!ng a text entry box or a file upload
NURS_500_DE – Case Study Rubric
Criteria Ra"ngs Pts
20 pts
20 pts
7.5 pts
2.5 pts
Start Assignment
Sociologic Sciences Interac!ve Case Study Complete the Sociologic Sciences Interac!ve Case Study following the readings and presenta!on for this week. Associate what you have learned about the theories to this case study, and then see the instruc!ons below to complete a journal entry about your experience.
During weeks 2 & 4, you will complete interac!ve case studies and be asked to associate what you have learned about theory in comparison to the case study and reflect on it.
Each !me you have completed a case study, submit your reflec!on. Each reflec!on should include the following:
A comparison of what you have learned from the case study to related theories you have studied. Make sure to cite these theories in APA format. A comparison of the case study to your nursing prac!ce, giving one or two examples from your nursing experience in which you might have applied a par!cular theory covered.
Your reflec!on should be a minimum of five to six paragraphs.
Cri!cal Analysis
20 to >16.4 pts Meets Expecta"ons
Presents an exemplary ar!cula!on and insigh"ul analysis of significant concepts and/or theories presented in the case. Offers detailed and specific examples for all ques!ons. Makes keen observa!ons, making note of essen!al informa!on provided in the case. Ideas are professionally sound and crea!ve; they are supported by scien!fic evidence that is credible and !mely. Draws insigh"ul and comprehensive conclusions and solu!ons.
16.4 to >15.0 pts Approaches Expecta"ons
Presents an accurate analysis of significant concepts and/or theories presented in the case. Offers some detail and some examples for most ques!ons. Makes occasional note of essen!al informa!on provided in the case. Ideas are mostly supported by scien!fic evidence that is credible and !mely. Makes some a$empt to draw conclusions and solu!ons.
15 to >11.8 pts Falls Below Expecta"ons
Provides insufficient explana!ons of significant concepts. Offers li$le or insignificant detail and no examples for most ques!ons. Fails to address essen!al informa!on provided in the case. Ideas are generally unsupported by scien!fic evidence, but some a$empt has been made. Fails to draw conclusion.
11.8 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expecta"ons
Does not, or incorrectly, answers with insufficient explana!ons. Informa!on is not scien!fically sound.
Content 20 to >16.4 pts Meets Expecta"ons
Makes insigh"ul, clear and accurate connec!ons to key concepts and relevant theories. Response indicates a comprehensive, high-level understanding of the concepts presented in the case.
16.4 to >15.0 pts Approaches Expecta"ons
Makes mostly accurate connec!ons to key concepts and relevant theories. Response indicates a general understanding of the concepts presented in the case.
15 to >11.8 pts Falls Below Expecta"ons
Provides several insufficient or inaccurate explana!ons, although a$empts are made to address some key concepts. Response indicates an introductory understanding of the concepts presented in the case.
11.8 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expecta"ons
Informa!on is inaccurate or inadequate. Response indicates li$le or no understanding of the concepts presented in the case.
Mechanics 7.5 to >6.15 pts Meets Expecta"ons
Answers are well wri$en throughout. Informa!on is well organized and clearly communicated. Assignment is free of spelling and gramma!cal errors.
6.15 to >5.63 pts Approaches Expecta"ons
Answers are well wri$en throughout and the informa!on is reasonably organized and communicated. Assignment is mostly free of spelling and gramma!cal errors.
5.63 to >4.43 pts Falls Below Expecta"ons
Answers are somewhat organized and lacks some clarity. Contains some spelling and gramma!cal errors.
4.43 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expecta"ons
Answers are not well wri$en and lack clarity. Informa!on is poorly organized. Assignment contains many spelling and gramma!cal errors.
APA Format
2.5 to >2.05 pts Meets Expecta"ons
Follows all the requirements related to format, length, source cita!ons, and layout.
2.05 to >1.88 pts Approaches Expecta"ons
Follows length requirement and most of the requirements related to format, source cita!ons, and layout.
1.88 to >1.48 pts Falls Below Expecta"ons
Follows most of the requirements related to format, length, source cita!ons, and layout.
1.48 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expecta"ons
Does not follow format, length, source cita!ons, and layout requirements.
"Previous Next#
WCU_202209FAIOL
Home
Announcements
Syllabus
VitalSource E-Text
Modules
Assignments
Discussions
Grades
My Panopto Videos
Zoom
Tutor.com
Course Evalua!ons
WCU Library
Remind
Chat with Gabby
Account
Dashboard
Courses
Calendar
Inbox
History
Studio
Help
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
