Recommend an appropriate and effective leadership style that superiors at the organization could employ to address the problem and best fit the organization based on your previou
A. Recommend an appropriate and effective leadership style that superiors at the organization could employ to address the problem and best fit the organization based on your previous analysis. Be sure to justify your response. B. Make recommendations to leadership for resolving the situation that balance the needs of the community, effectively addressing the problem, and what is ethically appropriate. How should leadership balance these three important elements in addressing the problem? C. Recommend strategies or actions that leadership could take to improve community relations and foster growth and trust between the community and the organization in response to the problem from the chosen scenario. Be sure to justify your response, and support your response with appropriate research from the field gathered in your previous review. D. Recommend strategies or actions that leadership could take to maintain and improve the culture of the organization in response to the ethical decisions of leadership regarding the problem from the chosen scenario. Be sure to justify your response, and support your response with appropriate research from the field gathered in your previous review. E. Make recommendations for the organization on how they could account for obstacles that might impede the organization in addressing the problem and implementing your recommendations. F. Explain how the organization could implement and uphold your recommendations. For example, should they enact new policies? Training? G. Explain how the organization would consider any budgetary constraints they might face both in addressing the problem and implementing any of your recommendations.
REFERENCE MATERIAL ATTACHED, ALONG WITH TOPIC SELECTION
CJ 510 Milestone Four Guidelines and Rubric
Overview: The final project in this course will expose you to a problem situation and task you with how it should be solved. You will imagine you are employed at a criminal justice organization facing a communal problem. Your superior at the organization has asked you to review the problem situation and offer your recommendations. You will be given the chance to evaluate the situation and develop suggestions that will inform development of strategies to address the issue using appropriate ethical and transparent leadership and communication skills.
The main purpose of this fourth milestone of your project is to get you to work on the recommendations portion of your final project. You will use your previous analysis of the leadership and ethics and recommend strategies to help improve the organization’s use of ethical decision-making, the overall culture of the organization, and their relationship with the community. You will then identify obstacles that might occur when the plan is being implemented and strategies to help the organization implement and uphold your recommendations.
Prompt: Using your selected case study, complete the following critical elements for the assignment:
A. Recommend an appropriate and effective leadership style that superiors at the organization could employ to address the problem and best fit the organization based on your previous analysis. Be sure to justify your response.
B. Make recommendations to leadership for resolving the situation that balance the needs of the community, effectively addressing the problem, and what is ethically appropriate. How should leadership balance these three important elements in addressing the problem?
C. Recommend strategies or actions that leadership could take to improve community relations and foster growth and trust between the community and the organization in response to the problem from the chosen scenario. Be sure to justify your response, and support your response with appropriate research from the field gathered in your previous review.
D. Recommend strategies or actions that leadership could take to maintain and improve the culture of the organization in response to the ethical decisions of leadership regarding the problem from the chosen scenario. Be sure to justify your response, and support your response with appropriate research from the field gathered in your previous review.
E. Make recommendations for the organization on how they could account for obstacles that might impede the organization in addressing the problem and implementing your recommendations.
F. Explain how the organization could implement and uphold your recommendations. For example, should they enact new policies? Training? G. Explain how the organization would consider any budgetary constraints they might face both in addressing the problem and implementing any of your
recommendations.
Refer to the Criminal Justice Library Tips for support in finding and citing outside resources.
Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Your problem analysis should be 2–3 pages in 12 point Times New Roman font, double-spaced, following appropriate APA formatting.
Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (80%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Recommendations: Leadership Style
Recommends an appropriate and effective leadership style that superiors at the organization could employ to address the problem and best fit the organization based on your previous analysis, justifying response and supporting response with appropriate research from the field
Recommends an appropriate and effective leadership style that superiors at the organization could employ to address the problem and best fit the organization based on your previous analysis, justifying response but recommendation is cursory, illogical, or there are gaps in the justification, or supporting research is inappropriate
Does not recommend an appropriate and effective leadership style that superiors at the organization could employ to address the problem and best fit the organization based on your previous analysis
15
Recommendations: Balance
Makes recommendations to leadership for resolving the situation that balance the needs of the community, effectively addressing the problem, and what is ethically appropriate
Makes recommendations to leadership for resolving the situation that balance the needs of the community, effectively addressing the problem, and what is ethically appropriate, but recommendations are cursory or illogical
Does not make recommendations to leadership for resolving the situation that balance the needs of the community, effectively addressing the problem, and what is ethically appropriate
15
Recommendations: Foster Growth and
Trust
Recommends strategies or actions that leadership could take to improve community relations and foster growth and trust between the community and the organization in response to the problem from the chosen scenario, justifying response and supporting response with appropriate research from the field
Recommends strategies or actions that leadership could take to improve community relations and foster growth and trust between the community and the organization in response to the problem from the chosen scenario, justifying response, but recommendations are cursory, illogical, or there are gaps in the justification, or supporting research is inappropriate
Does not recommend strategies or actions that leadership could take to improve community relations and foster growth and trust between the community and the organization in response to the problem from the chosen scenario
15
Recommendations: Culture
Recommends strategies or actions that leadership could take to maintain and improve the culture of the organization in response to the ethical decisions of leadership regarding the problem from the chosen scenario, justifying response and supporting response with appropriate research from the field
Recommends strategies or actions that leadership could take to maintain and improve the culture of the organization in response to the ethical decisions of leadership regarding the problem from the chosen scenario, justifying response but recommendations are cursory, illogical, or there are gaps in the justification, or supporting research is inappropriate
Does not recommend strategies or actions that leadership could take to maintain and improve the culture of the organization in response to the ethical decisions of leadership regarding the problem from the chosen scenario
15
Recommendations: Obstacles
Makes recommendations for the organization for how they could account for obstacles that might impede the organization in addressing the problem and implementing recommendations
Makes recommendations for the organization for how they could account for obstacles that might impede the organization in addressing the problem and implementing recommendations but recommendations are cursory or illogical
Does not make recommendations for the organization for how they could account for obstacles that might impede the organization in addressing the problem and implementing recommendations
10
Recommendations: Implement and
Uphold
Explains how the organization could implement and uphold recommendations
Explains how the organization could implement and uphold recommendations but explanation is cursory or illogical
Does not explain how the organization could implement and uphold recommendations
10
Recommendations: Budgetary Constraints
Explains how the organization would consider any budgetary constraints they might face both in addressing the problem and implementing any of recommendations
Explains how the organization would consider any budgetary constraints they might face both in addressing the problem and implementing any of recommendations but explanation is cursory or illogical
Does not explain how the organization would consider any budgetary constraints they might face both in addressing the problem and implementing any of recommendations
10
Articulation of Response
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas
10
Total 100%
- CJ 510 Milestone Four Guidelines and Rubric
- Rubric
,
3
1-2 Final Project Milestone One: Case Study Selection
CJ 510
Destiny Nance
Southern New Hampshire University
June 12th, 2022
The chosen case for this study is “The Flawed Emergency Response to the 1992 Los Angeles Riots”. I chose this case study because emergency responses aren’t always executed in the smoothest way and I say that based on a situation that happened recently. There was a school shooting in Uvalde, Texas and a lot of people, including the Chief of the Department said the response was flawed. The fulfillment of an emergency response is up to the capacity of an individual or element to answer what is the situations requirements and needs are, as they change quickly.
The case study was also selected in light of the fact that it investigates how the absence of assets and funding from the bureaucratic and state government sabotaged the capacity of the National Guard to successfully plan for civil unsettling influences. It is revealed that the response team of troops was halved from 10,000 to 5,000. A lot of those officers were not properly trained on civil disturbances. This is also something that is still alive today when it comes to the response of the riots in America.
One notable issue in this case study with leadership was the moving of the equipment. All of the equipment was organized and set in one location, Camp Roberts. This required everyone to have an extra task in the response process, that could’ve been avoided to save time if it was thought out smarter. Leadership called for delivery, but it still wasn’t a seamless process. Some of the equipment was even expired, so it couldn’t’ even be used in the riots. If the equipment was still closer to their person, I feel it could have been regularly monitored, so the expired things wouldn’t have been in the pile still. Even decisions of tradeoffs had to be made because not everything would fit onto the helicopter.
3-2 Final Project Milestone Two: Leadership Analysis
CJ 510
Destiny Nance
Southern New Hampshire University
June 26th, 2022
FACILITATE AND MOTIVATE
A prescriptive survey of the case study on "The Flawed Emergency Response to the 1992 Los Angeles Riots" uncovers that the authority didn't completely work with and propel the representatives in resolving the main issue. In the first place, representatives often expect pioneers to set up iron-clad plans and offer the essential help which will assist them with undertaking their predefined jobs and responsibilities(Schmidt, 1993). In view of the contextual analysis, the authority bombed in fostering a complete arrangement to manage the riots.
The leaders couldn't work with the National Guard with the vital apparatuses for their job in controlling the riots. Truly, a decent piece of the assets was less than impressive with the workers not being prepared on the most proficient method to deal with common unsettling influence (Harvard, 2000). The absence of preparing created turmoil among the representatives on the most proficient method to deal with the mobs which then, at that point, made a conflict of steady loss between the National Guard and the majority with the previous being censured for fierceness.
Moreover, there was nobody size-fits-all city plan which included general administrations, police, human administrations, and wellbeing. The city leaders flopped in its order to furnish the representatives with the imperative preparation and devices expected to achieve their mandate(Harvard, 2000). To exacerbate the situation, the initiative didn't altogether support and connect with the representatives. Instead of train them ahead of time, the leaders gave the representatives an intensive lesson on the most proficient method to deal with common unsettling influence when things had left hand. The absence of cooperation and support prompted the workers acting against the predefined rules of commitment which then, at that point, highlighted the rioting.
COMMUNICATION ISSUES
The highest correspondence issue distinguished for the case study is the absence of data and preparing for the National Guard on the most proficient method to manage common disturbances. The employees were not knowledgeable on the most proficient method to answer a mob with the leaders carrying out a makeshift arrangement wherein the troopers needed to peruse and sign a report in regards to the guidelines of commitment. The absence of correspondence and preparing sabotaged the undeveloped capacity of the association and its workers to achieve its predefined objective of controlling or handling riots (Center, 2021).
General Thrasher and individuals from the governors group were not educated about the absence of preparing. At the point when they found out about the correspondence pass, they chose to advise the representatives on the significance regarding restriction. Another correspondence issue recognized is the absence of clear understanding on the organization of ammo and fundamental hardware. The National Guard had recently moved the vast majority of its gear and ammo to a focal hold. At the point when the riots started, the leaders requested a helicopter to convey the ammo and gear to the organizing area(CNN, 2021). The correspondence at this crossroads was strong despite the fact that issues emerged on what was intended to be shipped. The leaders in charge chose to settle on compromise choices with the weighty ammo being eliminated to fit face shields, riot batons, and fit flak vests in the helicopters which went against what the men on the ground were expecting.
EFFECTIVE LEADERS
According to a basic point of view, it's a given that the leaders for the case study were a long way from being powerful. This is on the grounds that they couldn't impart in an unmistakable, compact, and careful manner(Western, 2020). They didn't share significant data nor request information and thoughts from the representatives on the most proficient method to deal with the uproars. Consequently, the pioneers couldn't enable the workers on the best way to deal with the uproars. The absence of preparing and data on the administration of the riots immediately prompted the workers being not able to clarify responsibility and trustworthiness during the rioting.
REFERENCES
Center for Creative Leadership. (2021). Why Communication Is So Important for Leaders. Retrieved from ccl.org/: https://www.ccl.org/articles/leading-effectivelyarticles/communication-1-idea-3-facts-5-tips/
CNN Editorial Research. (2021). The Flawed Emergency Response to the 1992 Los Angeles Riots (C). Retrieved from edition.cnn.com: https://edition.cnn.com/2013/09/18/us/losangeles-riots-fast-facts/index.html
Harvard Kennedy School. (2000). The Flawed Emergency Response to the 1992 Los Angeles Riots (C).
Schmidt, E. (1993). THE CALIFORNIA ARMY NATIONAL GUARD AND THE LOS ANGELES RIOT, APRIL AND MAY 1992.
Western Governors University. (2020, April 7). Leadership theories and styles. Retrieved from wgu.edu/: https://www.wgu.edu/blog/leadership-theories-styles2004.html
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
