Quality-improvement projects directly impact the
Quality-improvement projects directly impact the quality of health care delivery. Health care research can provide the data necessary for the systematic change process to guide decision-making.
In this assignment, you will apply your skill in quality improvement, which is necessary for you to implement the policies and processes to fulfill the purpose of the organization you work in as a health care administrator. You will evaluate the relationship between quality-improvement projects and health care research. You will choose a peer-reviewed article about a research study and evaluate the application of risk- and quality-management concepts in the health care industry in this assignment.
Assignment Preparation
Search the University Library for a peer-reviewed article about a research study related to quality-improvement projects in health care.
Review Evaluating Research Critical-Thinking Prompts to ensure you have selected an article that is most appropriate for completing the assignment.
Assignment Directions
1,050-word evaluation of the quality-improvement projects in health care research study you selected.
Use the Evaluating Research Critical-Thinking Prompts as a guide for what to include in each section. You may find it helpful to respond to each prompt in this document and use it as an outline for your assignment. While this is a guide for the content needed for this assignment, it is not a template for the format.
Include the following headings and sections.
- Research Steps: Provide the following:
- Define the problem.
- Explain the purpose of the research study.
- Explain the study variables.
- Explain the research question and/or hypothesis.
- Research Methodology, Design, and Analyses: Explain the research methodology, design, and analyses.
- Findings: Explain the research study’s findings.
- Conclusion:
- Summarize the research study’s recommendations.
- Explain the impact of the research to risk management and quality management.
- Cite sources to support your assignment.
Format your assignment according to the attached
HCS/465 v7
Evaluating Research Critical-Thinking Prompts
HCS/465 v7
Page 2 of 2
Evaluating Research Critical-Thinking Prompts
Review the following prompts and examples to guide you in your evaluation of the research study you selected.
Research Steps
Define the problem.
Prompts:
· What is the problem identified in your chosen article? Example: The Ebola outbreak and its prevalence in West African nations
· Why is it a problem? Example: Ebola is a disease that is contracted from [finish the statement]. Its symptoms are [finish the statement]. [Insert information] amount of people die each year. This is a problem because [finish the statement].
· What is the problem that the article or research study is trying to resolve? Example: Ebola has spread among the West African people because of [insert reason]. This research seeks to identify solutions that will prevent it from spreading among the African people.
· Why is the problem important for health care administrators to study? The research article may not identify a specific reason the research is important to health care administrators. That is acceptable. Write about why a health care administrator would want to study this topic. How could knowledge of this topic help you as a health care administrator? Example: As an assistant manager of a nursing home, I know that many of the residents have watched the news reports on the Ebola outbreak in Africa and its potential outbreak in the United States. Because I know little about the disease and because I know the concern that the reporting of this disease has brought on the residents of the nursing home, I felt that it was my responsibility to know more about the disease and how to prevent its spread. Providing the residents with this knowledge can go a long way toward calming their fears and enabling them and their caregivers to take measures to prevent any outbreak.
Identify the purpose of the study.
Prompts: If the answers to these questions are not expressly stated in the article, consider its entirety and write what you think the answers are.
· What is the purpose of the study?
· What is the author trying to accomplish in this study?
Example: The purpose of the study was to create awareness of the Ebola outbreak, to provide statistical data to give an accurate account of the scope of the outbreak, and to identify known methods to minimize exposure, recognize symptoms, and prevent outbreaks.
Identify the study variables.
Prompt:
· What are the independent and dependent study variables?
· Independent variables represent inputs and can have any value.
· Dependent variables represent outputs or effects.
Identify the research question and/or hypothesis.
Prompts:
· Was a research question or hypothesis provided in the article? If so, what is it? If not, why wasn’t one provided?
· What was the answer to the research question? Was the hypothesis accepted or rejected?
Example: The initial research question may be: What is the prevalence of Ebola in the West African nations after a new Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) protocol was implemented? The research explains in depth the living conditions that exist in the West African nations and why the disease is so prevalent. It further identifies and explains existing research conducted by the CDC that confirms the medical community’s awareness of the disease and established protocol to prevent it. The hypothesis can be: There is no statistically significant difference in Ebola prevalence after the CDC protocol was implemented.
Research Methodology, Design, and Analyses
Explain the research methodology, design, and analyses.
Prompts:
· Was the research qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods? Explain your response.
· Which population or sample was studied?
· What was the sampling method and type?
· How long did the study take?
· How was the data collected?
· What type of statistical analysis was used?
Example: The research used quantitative data collected by the American Red Cross, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). Data collection occurred over a 5-year period with help from 6 West African governments. The data tracked 100 residents from each country and monitored the spread of the disease among the citizens. Data analyses analyzed disease prevalence for decreases. Depending on Ebola prevalence, the research question can be answered. If Ebola prevalence decreased after implementing the CDC protocol, the hypothesis would be rejected.
Findings
Explain the research study’s findings.
Prompts:
· What were the research study’s findings?
· Were the research questions or hypotheses addressed?
Conclusion
Summarize the research study’s recommendations.
Prompts:
What were the research study’s recommendations?
Are the findings relevant to consumers, health care professionals, or both?
Explain the impact of the research to risk management and quality management.
Prompts:
How do the recommendations affect risk management and quality management in the health care environment?
How could you as a health care administrator use the information within this article as it relates to risk management and quality-improvement projects?
Example: The reporting of the Ebola outbreak in West Africa not only caused global panic, but also brought awareness of its cause and measures that can be taken to prevent its spread. The research conducted [finish statement]. As a health care administrator, I can use the information to [finish statement].
Copyright 2022 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Copyright 2022 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
,
Running head: THE LOOK, THINK, ACT CYCLE 1
The Look, Think, Act Cycle
Angela M Miller
Your University
October 13, 2020
1.
THE LOOK, THINK, ACT CYCLE
Introduction
In this assignment we were asked to find two peer reviewed articles, one dissertation or
thesis, one book and one miscellaneous item. We were to complete an annotated bibliography, as
well as compare and contrast the selected items. Below you will find my work. In this
assignment we were asked to find two peer reviewed articles, one dissertation or thesis, one book
and one miscellaneous item. We were to complete an annotated bibliography, as well as compare
and contrast the selected items. Below you will find my work.
Research Steps
In this assignment we were asked to find two peer reviewed articles, one dissertation or
thesis, one book and one miscellaneous item. We were to complete an annotated bibliography, as
well as compare and contrast the selected items. Below you will find my work.
The Problem
In this assignment we were asked to find two peer reviewed articles, one dissertation or
thesis, one book and one miscellaneous item. We were to complete an annotated bibliography, as
well as compare and contrast the selected items. Below you will find my work. In this
assignment we were asked to find two peer reviewed articles, one dissertation or thesis, one book
and one miscellaneous item. We were to complete an annotated bibliography, as well as compare
and contrast the selected items. Below you will find my work.
The Purpose
In this assignment we were asked to find two peer reviewed articles, one dissertation or
thesis, one book and one miscellaneous item. We were to complete an annotated bibliography, as
well as compare and contrast the selected items. Below you will find my work.
2
THE LOOK, THINK, ACT CYCLE
The Variables
In this assignment we were asked to find two peer reviewed articles, one dissertation or
thesis, one book and one miscellaneous item. We were to complete an annotated bibliography, as
well as compare and contrast the selected items. Below you will find my work.
The Question/Hypothesis
In this assignment we were asked to find two peer reviewed articles, one dissertation or
thesis, one book and one miscellaneous item. We were to complete an annotated bibliography, as
well as compare and contrast the selected items. Below you will find my work.
Research Methodology Design and Analyses
In this assignment we were asked to find two peer reviewed articles, one dissertation or
thesis, one book and one miscellaneous item. We were to complete an annotated bibliography, as
well as compare and contrast the selected items. Below you will find my work.
Methodology
In this assignment we were asked to find two peer reviewed articles, one dissertation or
thesis, one book and one miscellaneous item. We were to complete an annotated bibliography, as
well as compare and contrast the selected items. Below you will find my work.
Population
In this assignment we were asked to find two peer reviewed articles, one dissertation or
thesis, one book and one miscellaneous item. We were to complete an annotated bibliography, as
well as compare and contrast the selected items. Below you will find my work.
Sampling Method
3
THE LOOK, THINK, ACT CYCLE
In this assignment we were asked to find two peer reviewed articles, one dissertation or
thesis, one book and one miscellaneous item. We were to complete an annotated bibliography, as
well as compare and contrast the selected items. Below you will find my work.
Length of the Study
In this assignment we were asked to find two peer reviewed articles, one dissertation or
thesis, one book and one miscellaneous item. We were to complete an annotated bibliography, as
well as compare and contrast the selected items. Below you will find my work.
Data Collection
In this assignment we were asked to find two peer reviewed articles, one dissertation or
thesis, one book and one miscellaneous item. We were to complete an annotated bibliography, as
well as compare and contrast the selected items. Below you will find my work.
Statistical Analysis
In this assignment we were asked to find two peer reviewed articles, one dissertation or
thesis, one book and one miscellaneous item. We were to complete an annotated bibliography, as
well as compare and contrast the selected items. Below you will find my work.
Findings
In this assignment we were asked to find two peer reviewed articles, one dissertation or
thesis, one book and one miscellaneous item. We were to complete an annotated bibliography, as
well as compare and contrast the selected items. Below you will find my work.
Findings of this study
4
THE LOOK, THINK, ACT CYCLE
In this assignment we were asked to find two peer reviewed articles, one dissertation or
thesis, one book and one miscellaneous item. We were to complete an annotated bibliography, as
well as compare and contrast the selected items. Below you will find my work.
Did the Author address the Question/Hypothesis
In this assignment we were asked to find two peer reviewed articles, one dissertation or
thesis, one book and one miscellaneous item. We were to complete an annotated bibliography, as
well as compare and contrast the selected items. Below you will find my work.
Conclusion
In this assignment we were asked to find two peer reviewed articles, one dissertation or
thesis, one book and one miscellaneous item. We were to complete an annotated bibliography, as
well as compare and contrast the selected items. Below you will find my work.
Recommendations
In this assignment we were asked to find two peer reviewed articles, one dissertation or
thesis, one book and one miscellaneous item. We were to complete an annotated bibliography, as
well as compare and contrast the selected items. Below you will find my work.
Relevancy
In this assignment we were asked to find two peer reviewed articles, one dissertation or
thesis, one book and one miscellaneous item. We were to complete an annotated bibliography, as
well as compare and contrast the selected items. Below you will find my work.
Health Care Usage
5
THE LOOK, THINK, ACT CYCLE
In this assignment we were asked to find two peer reviewed articles, one dissertation or
thesis, one book and one miscellaneous item. We were to complete an annotated bibliography, as
well as compare and contrast the selected items. Below you will find my work.
6
THE LOOK, THINK, ACT CYCLE
References
7
,
1Alshammary SA, et al. BMJ Open Quality 2021;10:e001391. doi:10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001391
Open access
Enhancing palliative care occupancy and efficiency: a quality improvement project that uses a healthcare pathway for service integration and policy development
Sami Ayed Alshammary,1 Yacoub Abuzied ,2 Savithiri Ratnapalan3
To cite: Alshammary SA, Abuzied Y, Ratnapalan S. Enhancing palliative care occupancy and efficiency: a quality improvement project that uses a healthcare pathway for service integration and policy development. BMJ Open Quality 2021;10:e001391. doi:10.1136/ bmjoq-2021-001391
Received 13 February 2021 Accepted 10 October 2021
1Department of Palliative Care, Comprehensive Cancer Center, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia 2Department of Nursing, Rehabilitation Hospital, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia 3Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Correspondence to Yacoub Abuzied; [email protected] gmail. com
Original research
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re- use permitted under CC BY- NC. No commercial re- use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
ABSTRACT This article described our experience in implementing a quality improvement project to overcome the bed overcapacity problem at a comprehensive cancer centre in a tertiary care centre. We formed a multidisciplinary team including a representative from patient and family support (six members), hospice care and home care services (four members), multidisciplinary team development (four members) and the national lead. The primary responsibility of the formulated team was implementing measures to optimise and manage patient flow. We used the plan– do–study–act cycle to engage all stakeholders from all service layers, test some interventions in simplified pilots and develop a more detailed plan and business case for further implementation and roll- out, which was used as a problem- solving approach in our project for refining a process or implementing changes. As a result, we observed a significant reduction in bed capacity from 35% in 2017 to 13.8% in 2018. While the original length of stay (LOS) was 28 days, the average LOS was 19 days in 2017 (including the time before and after the intervention), 10.8 days in 2018 (after the intervention was implemented), 10.1 days in 2019 and 16 days in 2020. The increase in 2020 parameters was caused by the COVID- 19 pandemic, since many patients did not enrol in our new care model. Using a systematic care delivery approach by a multidisciplinary team improves significantly reduced bed occupancy and reduces LOS for palliative care patients.
PROBLEM STATEMENT Palliative care is vital to enhance the quality of life for curative patients, seriously ill patients, patients in terminal stages or patients with considerable pain, including patients with cancer. In collaboration with other depart- ments, the palliative care department (PCD) provides inpatient and outpatient care to optimise the target patients’ well- being. Unfortunately, unexpected bed overcapacity by palliative care patients has been observed to highlight an urgent need for improvement.
The PCD is part of a comprehensive cancer centre (CCC) at King Fahad Medical City (KFMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. KFMC is a
Ministry of Health tertiary care complex hospital with 1200 beds. It served around 30 000 inpatients and 500 000 outpatients annu- ally. The CCC is part of the national cancer strategy and is considered a primary ministry of a health reference centre for patients with cancer from all Saudi Arabia regions. The centre covers haematology, bone and marrow transplant and medical oncology for adult and paediatric patients, in addition to radi- ation therapy and palliative treatment. The total bed capacity for palliative care in CCC represents 87 beds.
Based on the available logistic patient’s information, the PCD established a plan to have an occupancy rate of around 10% of all beds in CCC for palliative care patients. However, we observed that palliative care patients occupied 35%–50% of all CCCs, representing around 300% of allocated to palliative care patients. This bed overca- pacity leads to hospital- wide logistic and clin- ical burdens. It contributed to an increased burden on human resources, leading to staff shortage and increasing healthcare providers’ workload. Besides, bed overcapacity disrupts other services such as the emergency depart- ment, internal medicine and surgery by displaced patients with cancer and unplanned emergency room (ER) visits. Concurrently, we observed a prolonged length of stay (LOS) for palliative care patients with a LOS average of 28 days. Figure 1 shows the problem high- lights and critical challenging.
The quality team at PCD realised the burden of this problem. We implemented a quality improvement project to reduce the overbed capacity for palliative care patients from 35% in January 2017 by 10% by May 2018 in CCC. We aimed to reduce palliative care patients' average LOS (ALOS) from 28 days in January 2018 by 20% in May 2018.
o n
M a
y 1 9 , 2
0 2 2
b y g
u e
st. P ro
te cte
d b
y co p yrig
h t.
h ttp
://b m
jo p e n q u a
lity.b m
j.co m
/ B
M J O
p e
n Q
u a
l: first p u
b lish
e d
a s 1
0 .1
1 3
6 /b
m jo
q -2
0 2
1 -0
0 1
3 9
1 o
n 2
7 O
cto b e r 2
0 2 1 . D
o w
n lo
a d e d fro
m
2 Alshammary SA, et al. BMJ Open Quality 2021;10:e001391. doi:10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001391
Open access
BACKGROUND Palliative care aims to improve the quality of life for both patients and families. It focuses on preventing and miti- gating suffering from physical, psychological, social or spiritual symptoms associated with life- threatening condi- tions.1 Palliative care is provided by a multidisciplinary team, as it requires integration and management for multiple internal and external services and entities.
Integration of palliative care into public health systems and other care levels is an ethical responsibility,2 yet more than 85% of patients globally who need palliative care cannot reach it.1 Improving access to palliative care requires increasing the capacity of an existing programme and developing healthcare programmes. More attention should be given to understanding and organising palli- ative care, training healthcare providers and providing public education. Decision- makers should address the multidisciplinary healthcare professions, policy and procedures, required resources, required knowledge and skills and education.1 3
Ignoring the current state resources, prioritising bed allocation, targeted stakeholders or the required skills and knowledge will lead to misusing or overusing the resources. For example, many of the available beds are occupied by patients requiring alternative care levels or receiving in- hospital care when not needed (unneces- sarily occupying of bed).
Struggling with bed congestion (overcapacity) is a global problem for the healthcare system. Usually is reflected by mismatches between capacity and demand while providing care.4 5 It contributed to a chronic bed shortage, staff shortage and increased the burden on other departments, leading to overcrowded, delay in care and financial consequences, insufficient coordination between departments and prolonged LOS.6–8
Healthcare management identifies the way a healthcare facility is organised and coordinated. It contributed to finding solutions in different healthcare areas, including bed capacity and LOS. For example, management of bed overcapacity varied according to specified problems or departments (one size does not fit all). The different intervention has been applied to manage overcapacity problems. Examples of these strategies include the
overcapacity management model,4 dynamic inpatient bed management by reducing non- emergency department (ED) admissions,8 full capacity protocol,9 diagnostic- therapeutic- assistance path,10–12 discharge lounge,13 bed huddles,14 reopening previously closed beds or adding new beds5 or forecasting modelling framework.15 These interventions focused on expanding, reducing the boarding time, reducing the LOS, improving patients’ flow, free up available spaces or forecasting modelling.
Palliative care aims to support people with complex needs by providing care by different specialties. Using a multidisciplinary team and integrating a structured method to assess and treat palliative care patients is essential to ensure consistency and a systematic approach in delivering palliative care.16 We believe that a system- atic care delivery approach for improving an existing capacity is necessary to provide the proper care, right place and right time. There was a real need to improve palliative care bed occupancy and efficiency in order to provide proper care for all patients and the projected proposal was strongly agreed upon and supported by the leaders, where this will improve palliative care in general, mainly bed occupancy and cost- effectiveness. Where our aim was to reduce the overbed capacity for palliative care patients in CCC. Also, we aimed to reduce the ALOS of palliative care patients, as well as their cost- effectiveness. From the start, we established a plan that included frequent multidisciplinary meet- ings to ensure the success, development and sustain- ability of our project, as well as an evaluation process of weekly challenges, obstacles and accomplishments. The assumptions were that by having an organised team and support from the institution and leader, the outcomes would be as predicted and ideal. This article described our experience implementing a quality improvement project to overcome the bed overcapacity problem at a CCC in a tertiary care centre. This article followed the Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excel- lence (SQUIRE) guidelines.17 The SQUIRE guidelines provide a framework to report on new insights into how healthcare is improved. They are intended for reports describing healthcare workers’ quality, safety and value at the system level.
MEASUREMENTS For this project, we collected data before and after the initiation of the quality improvement project. We calcu- lated the CCC bed occupancy rate by palliative care patients monthly. Then, we divided the mean number of monthly beds occupied by palliative care patients by the total number of all CCC beds (87 beds). We also calcu- lated the entire LOS days and the average LOS for pallia- tive care patients in CCC by reviewing the date of hospital admissions and hospital discharges. Also, we calculated the average monthly number of unplanned ER visits by palliative care patients (table 1).
Figure 1 2017 statistics and key challenges. MDT, multidisciplinary team; PCA, patient control analgesia.
o n
M a
y 1 9 , 2
0 2 2
b y g
u e
st. P ro
te cte
d b
y co p yrig
h t.
h ttp
://b m
jo p e n q u a
lity.b m
j.co m
/ B
M J O
p e
n Q
u a
l: first p u
b lish
e d
a s 1
0 .1
1 3
6 /b
m jo
q -2
0 2
1 -0
0 1
3 9
1 o
n 2
7 O
cto b e r 2
0 2 1 . D
o w
n lo
a d e d fro
m
3Alshammary SA, et al. BMJ Open Quality 2021;10:e001391. doi:10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001391
Open access
ER visits of 2020 are mostly patients who were not recruited into our new model of care. Therefore, we expect this indicator to lag behind 8–12 months.
We calculated the cost of care for admitted palliative care patients by multiplying the total number of patient’s days by the estimated cost per patient. To meet our project goals for reducing bed overcapacity and LOS for palliative care patients, we planned to start measuring from January 2017 and continue counting until December 2020 (1000 days for PC transformation). Measuring project indica- tors over a long time will allow us to observe the improve- ment and observe its sustainability. Data were collected by trained staff from the quality improvement team at PCD.
Baseline measurement showed that the average number of beds used by palliative care patients in CCC
was 30, representing 35% of CCC bed occupancy. This rate exceeds three times the planned rate of 10% of CCC beds by palliative care patients. The baseline average LOS was 28 days. The number of unplanned ER visits was 7.9 in 2017. The cost of care for admitted palliative care patients in CCC was US$18 170 000.
Patient and public involvement Patients were not specifically included in the analysis since all statistics were gathered from the department’s database, including data on admissions and discharges during their stay at the hospital if their permission is not necessary as the approval received from the department chair.
Design Understanding the system’s complexity and its interac- tion is crucial for successfully implementing any quality improvement project.18 Palliative care is a complex setting requiring a multidisciplinary team and a system- atic approach to assess and treat patients.16 Similarly, solving problems and improving the palliative care setting processes required a systematic approach involving all stakeholders. Therefore, we initiated a future state pathway map for the palliative care process (figure 2). We formed a multidisciplinary team, including a represent- ative from patients and family support (six members), hospice care and home care services (four members), multidisciplinary team development (four members) and the national lead. The primary responsibility of the formulated team was implementing measures to optimise and manage patient flow.
To measure our quality improvement project’s effec- tiveness on the process, we implemented a pre and post quasi- experimental design, in which the observations are made before and after the intervention. We analysed the
Table 1 Unplanned emergency room visits by palliative care patients
2017 2018 2019 2020
January 5 5 8 7
February 8 5 7 4
March 5 9 7 6
April 9 5 4 11
May 10 9 2 9
June 9 7 11 13
July 9 5 8 6
August 9 6 9 9
September 13 4 8 10
October 6 5 5 12
November 5 3 9 7
December 7 4 9 7
Annual average 7.92 5.58 7.25 8.42
Figure 2 Future state pathway map—palliative care.
o n
M a
y 1 9 , 2
0 2 2
b y g
u e
st. P ro
te cte
d b
y co p yrig
h t.
h ttp
://b m
jo p e n q u a
lity.b m
j.co m
/ B
M J O
p e
n Q
u a
l: first p u
b lish
e d
a s 1
0 .1
1 3
6 /b
m jo
q -2
0 2
1 -0
0 1
3 9
1 o
n 2
7 O
cto b e r 2
0 2 1 . D
o w
n lo
a d e d fro
m
4 Alshammary SA, et al. BMJ Open Quality 2021;10:e001391. doi:10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001391
Open access
data over time and presented them using run charts and tables. To ensure that the improvement is related to the intervention, we measured the data for a long time; more specifically, we measured the data in 4 years (2017–2020). To make our intervention sustainable, we developed and implemented relevant tools, policies and procedures. We set goals for a 100- day plan to complete our inter- vention (figures 3 and 4). In addition, we calculated and compared the cost of care.
Strategy Our smart aim was to reduce the overbed capacity for palliative care patients from 35% in January 2018 to 10% by May 2018 in CCC. Also, we aimed to reduce the ALOS
of palliative care patients from 28 days in January 2018 by 20% in May 2018. Plan–do–study–act cycle was used as a problem- solving approach in our project for refining a process or implementing changes to enl
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
