The DSM-5 is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for
The DSM-5 is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the DSM-5, and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose. There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder.
In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders.
To Prepare
- Review this week’s Learning Resources on dissociative disorders.
- Use the Walden Library to investigate the controversy regarding dissociative disorders. Locate at least three scholarly articles that you can use to support your Assignment.
The Assignment (2–3 pages)
- Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders.
- Explain your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature.
- Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.
- Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important.
PLEASE FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS AS INDICATED BELOW:
1). ZERO (0) PLAGIARISM
2). AT LEAST 5 REFERENCES, NO MORE THAN 5 YEARS.
3). PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED RUBRIC DETAILS, Assignment instructions
4) PLEASE FOLLOW THE APA 7 WRITING STYLE/FORMAT.
,
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: NRNP_6665_Week9_Assignment_Rubric
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| In 2–3 pages, address the following: • Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders. | Points: Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) The response includes an accurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 11 (11%) – 11 (11%) The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 10 (10%) The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. Or the response is missing. Feedback: |
| • Explain your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature. | Points: Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%) The response includes a thorough and well-organized explanation of the student's professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale demonstrates critical thinking and is strongly supported with three scholarly references. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%) The response includes a well-organized explanation of the student's professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is clear and appropriately supported with three scholarly references. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 18 (18%) – 19 (19%) The response includes a somewhat vague explanation of the student's professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is somewhat unclear and references either provide weak support for the rationale or are not scholarly/current. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%) The response includes a vague explanation of the student's professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is unclear and references are inappropriate. Or the response is missing. Feedback: |
| • Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. | Points: Points Range: 27 (27%) – 30 (30%) The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 24 (24%) – 26 (26%) The response includes an accurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 21 (21%) – 23 (23%) The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 20 (20%) The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. Or the response is missing. Feedback: |
| • Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important. | Points: Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) The response includes an accurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 11 (11%) – 11 (11%) The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 10 (10%) The response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Or, response is missing. Feedback: |
| Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria. | Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. Feedback: |
| Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains three or four grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding Feedback: |
| Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains one or two APA format errors Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains three or four APA format errors Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (five or more) APA format errors Feedback: |
Show Descriptions Show Feedback
In 2–3 pages, address the following: • Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders.–
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. Good 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) The response includes an accurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. Fair 11 (11%) – 11 (11%) The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. Poor 0 (0%) – 10 (10%) The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. Or the response is missing. Feedback:
• Explain your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature.–
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 23 (23%) – 25 (25%) The response includes a thorough and well-organized explanation of the student's professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale demonstrates critical thinking and is strongly supported with three scholarly references. Good 20 (20%) – 22 (22%) The response includes a well-organized explanation of the student's professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is clear and appropriately supported with three scholarly references. Fair 18 (18%) – 19 (19%) The response includes a somewhat vague explanation of the student's professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is somewhat unclear and references either provide weak support for the rationale or are not scholarly/current. Poor 0 (0%) – 17 (17%) The response includes a vague explanation of the student's professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is unclear and references are inappropriate. Or the response is missing. Feedback:
• Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.–
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 27 (27%) – 30 (30%) The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. Good 24 (24%) – 26 (26%) The response includes an accurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. Fair 21 (21%) – 23 (23%) The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. Poor 0 (0%) – 20 (20%) The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. Or the response is missing. Feedback:
• Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important.–
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Good 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) The response includes an accurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Fair 11 (11%) – 11 (11%) The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Poor 0 (0%) – 10 (10%) The response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Or, response is missing. Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.–
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive. Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation–
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains three or four grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.–
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains one or two APA format errors Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains three or four APA format errors Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (five or more) APA format errors Feedback:
| Total Points: 100 |
|---|
Name: NRNP_6665_Week9_Assignment_Rubric
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
