After reading the case study ‘Internal Consistency at Customers First’ at the end of Chapter 6 of your textbook, write a short pa
After reading the case study "Internal Consistency at Customers First" at the end of Chapter 6 of your textbook, write a short paper that adequately answers the following questions:
- Do you think that job analysis and job evaluation will benefit Customers First? Why or why not?
- What is your opinion of Joan's view on job analysis and job evaluation?
- What do you recommend the compensation professionals at Customers First do? Why?
OL 620 Module Four Short Paper Guidelines and Rubric Write a short paper addressing job analysis and job evaluation as they relate to employee compensation. Begin by thoroughly reading Chapter 6, including the case study “Internal Consistency at Customers First” at the end of the chapter. Then write a short paper that adequately answers the following questions:
Do you think that job analysis and job evaluation will benefit Customers First? Why or why not?
What is your opinion of Joan’s view on job analysis and job evaluation?
What do you recommend that the compensation professionals at Customers First do? Why? Guidelines for Submission: Your paper must be submitted as a 2- to 3-page Microsoft Word document (in addition to a cover page and references) with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Use at least three sources, which should be cited according to APA style.
Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Job Analysis and Job Evaluation
Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides thorough rationale with relevant and specific examples
Indicates opinion as to whether job analysis and job evaluation will benefit Customers First and provides relevant and/or specific details in explanation
Indicates opinion, but the explanation is irrelevant or lacks specific details
Does not indicate opinion as to whether job analysis and job evaluation will benefit Customers First
30
Joan’s View on Job Analysis and Job
Evaluation
Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides thorough rationale with relevant and specific examples
Indicates opinion of Joan’s view and provides relevant and/or specific details in explanation
Indicates opinion, but the explanation is irrelevant or lacks specific details
Does not indicate opinion of Joan’s view
30
Recommendations Meets “Proficient” criteria and makes thorough recommendations with relevant and specific details in explanation
Makes recommendations for the compensation professionals at Customers First and provides relevant and/or specific details in explanation
Makes recommendations, but the explanation is irrelevant or lacks specific details
Does not make recommendations for the compensation professionals at Customers First
30
Articulation of Response
Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy to read format
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas
10
Total 100%
,
Case: Internal Consistency at Costumers First
After 3 months in her new role as Director of Human Resources at Customers First, Deborah Ketson feels confident she has identified the significant HR issues at the company. She has prioritized the issues and is meeting with company president Joan Bates to make her recommendations. Deborah is prepared to discuss her top priority, which is to conduct an organization-wide job analysis and job evaluation project in order to start building a more internally consistent pay.
Customers First is a company that provides customer service for other companies. Small-to-medium-sized companies outsource service function to Customer First, which manages all customer service for their clients through a call center and also via an online customer service center. The company works with a diverse group of clients ranging from small retail stores to larger online retailers. Customers First has grown quickly in the 5 years since Joan started the company, and now employs more than 150 customer service representatives and other support staff.
The company’s quick growth has led to several problems with its compensation structure. Much of the company’s hiring has occurred in response to a new contract, and pay was set based on the current market rate for CSTs in order to attract the right talent. For example, an early client was a small retail store that needed fairly simple customer support. Four CSRs were hired and their pay was set at just slightly above minimum wage. In comparison, a more recent client required hiring 18 CSRs. The labor market was competitive at the time, and the company hired these 18 new employees at a pay rate well above what others at the company were paid. Such variance has occurred often in the hiring process, resulting in groups of CSRs at much different levels of pay for doing substantially similar work.
Deborah has heard many complaints from the supervisors about inequities in the pay of the CSRs. The supervisors are concerned that the iniquities may lead to turnover among some of the staff. Deborah has examined the pay rates of the CSRs across the organization and agrees with the supervisors that there are some concerns. One particular concern is that the lowest paid group of CSRs is primarily female, while the highest paid group includes all male employees. By talking with the supervisors, Deborah has learned that there are some CSRs with different levels of responsibilities and skills, but they all hold the same job title. Deborah believes that an organization-wide job analysis and job evaluation is necessary to build an internally consistent compensation structure.
However, when she shared the recommendation with Joan, she did not receive the response she expected. Joan is resistant of the job analysis and job evaluation process as she thinks that having such a structured compensation system will limit the company’s ability to be flexible in the marketplace. Often hiring happens quickly in response to a new client contract, and they must hire the right skill set, which might vary based on the current market rates. Further, Joan suggested the entire project would be too time-consuming for Deborah and the other staff that would need to be involved. She felt their time would be better spent on other concerns such as recruiting new staff.
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.