Review your problem or issue and the cultural assessment. Consider how the findings connect to your topic and intervention for yo
Review your problem or issue and the cultural assessment. Consider how the findings connect to your topic and intervention for your capstone change project. Write a list of three to five objectives for your proposed intervention. Below each objective, provide a one or two sentence rationale.
After writing your objectives, provide a rationale for how your proposed project and objectives advocate for autonomy and social justice for individuals and diverse populations.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
Benchmark Information
This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:
RN to BSN
1.5: Advocate for autonomy and social justice for individuals and diverse populations.
Benchmark – Capstone Change Project Objectives – Rubric
Collapse All Benchmark – Capstone Change Project Objectives – RubricCollapse All
Objectives
1.25 points
Criteria Description
Objectives
5. 5: Excellent
1.25 points
Three to five objectives are presented.
4. 4: Good
1.11 points
NA
3. 3: Satisfactory
0.99 points
NA
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
0.94 points
NA
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
A list of objectives for the proposed intervention is omitted. Fewer than three objectives are presented.
Rationale for How Findings Relate to the Topic and Proposed Intervention
1.5 points
Criteria Description
Rationale for How Findings Relate to the Topic and Proposed Intervention
5. 5: Excellent
1.5 points
Rationale is clearly provided for each objective and thoroughly explains the relationship of the findings to the topic and proposed intervention.
4. 4: Good
1.34 points
Rationale is provided for each objective and explains the relationship of findings to the topic and proposed intervention. Some detail is needed for clarity.
3. 3: Satisfactory
1.19 points
General rationale is provided for each objective and generally summarizes the relationship of most findings to the topic and proposed intervention. There are some inaccuracies or minor omissions.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
1.13 points
Rationale is incomplete. There are omissions. Rationale provided does not explain the relationship of findings to the topic and proposed intervention.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Rationale for each objective is omitted.
Rationale for Autonomy and Social Justice
1.25 points
Criteria Description
Rationale for How Proposed Project and Objectives Advocate for Autonomy and Social Justice for Individuals and Diverse Populations (C1.5)
5. 5: Excellent
1.25 points
Well-supported rationale for how proposed project and objectives advocate for autonomy and social justice for individuals and diverse populations is presented. Advocacy for autonomy and social justice for individuals and diverse populations is clearly established.
4. 4: Good
1.11 points
Rationale for how proposed project and objectives advocate for autonomy and social justice for individuals and diverse populations is presented. Advocacy is generally established.
3. 3: Satisfactory
0.99 points
Rationale for how proposed project and objectives advocate for autonomy and social justice for individuals and diverse populations is summarized. Some advocacy is established.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
0.94 points
Incomplete rationale for how proposed project and objectives advocate for autonomy and social justice for individuals and diverse populations is presented. Advocacy is not established.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Rationale for how proposed project and objectives advocate for autonomy and social justice for individuals and diverse populations is omitted.
Thesis Development and Purpose
0.25 points
Criteria Description
Thesis Development and Purpose
5. 5: Excellent
0.25 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
4. 4: Good
0.22 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
3. 3: Satisfactory
0.2 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
0.19 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Argument Logic and Construction
0.25 points
Criteria Description
Argument Logic and Construction
5. 5: Excellent
0.25 points
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
4. 4: Good
0.22 points
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
3. 3: Satisfactory
0.2 points
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
0.19 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Criteria 3Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
0.25 points
Criteria Description
Criteria 3Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5. 5: Excellent
0.25 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4. 4: Good
0.22 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.
3. 3: Satisfactory
0.2 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
0.19 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
0.1 points
Criteria Description
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5. 5: Excellent
0.1 points
All format elements are correct.
4. 4: Good
0.09 points
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
3. 3: Satisfactory
0.08 points
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
0.08 points
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Documentation of Sources
0.15 points
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
5. 5: Excellent
0.15 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
4. 4: Good
0.13 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
3. 3: Satisfactory
0.12 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
0.11 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not documented.
Total 5 points
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
