The difference between a great r esearch p aper and a marginal one is the depth and originality of your discussion and conclusion
The difference between a great r esearch p aper and a marginal one is the depth and originality of your discussion and conclusion. This is where you bring together what you have learned through your research as well as through the course regarding your topic in the concluding remarks of your p aper. The discussion and conclusions section should be one to two (1-2) pages in length.th.
The difference between a great r esearch p aper and a marginal one is the depth and originality of your discussion and conclusion. This is where you bring together what you have learned through your research as well as through the course regarding your topic in the concluding remarks of your p aper. The discussion and conclusions section should be one to two (1-2) pages in length.
In this section, you will include:
- Talk about your overall results and story
- Interpret your findings and discoveries moving from specific to general. Include the following:
- Evaluate your hypothesis
- Discuss unexpected results
- Tie in your literature review by linking your findings to the research you reviewed
- Consider the following:
- Focus on new information or broaden your perspective; do not repeat your results section
- Discuss literature findings (differences and commonalities)
- Discuss limitations and future research
- Were the results of your final project experiment the same as your expected hypotheses?
- Mention any results that run counter to your expected hypotheses. In your opinion, what factors could have influenced the results?
- What real-life psychological phenomena might be explained or modeled by the findings of this experiment? How?
Running Head: WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT 1
WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT
Mid-week Assignment
January 28, 2022
In the beginning, Signal detection theory was used to observe the radar’s performance. It detects signals that interfere and respond accordingly. Noise is anything that can interfere with the stimulus of the detection. Noise cannot be specific to hearing, in fact, it refers to anything that interferes with detection. In signal detection theory (SDT) we learn about the possible outcomes such as response. In addition, the signal is also important while studying SDT. We study absolute and difference thresholds in SDT and it is related to psychophysics. Both response and signal play a vital role in signal detection theory. In sensory experiments, Signal detection theory helps a lot. Human decisions are also detected through this theory. Basically, this theory perceives decision making, meaning how an individual makes decisions. In the presence of uncertainty, decision-making takes place and under uncertainty, SDT analyzes this decision-making. Many decision problems are also evaluated with the help of this theory.
The study conducted by (Sumner & Sumner, 2020) investigates how sensory information and decisions determine actions. In psychological studies, the Signal detection theory has been widely used. It forms the basis for Conspecific acceptance thresholds models. Animal behaviors can also be determined with the help of Signal detection theory. In this study (Sumner & Sumner, 2020) explains the ecological behaviors in animals. The conspecific acceptance thresholds (CAT) model is used in this study which tells us the animal behavior in their natural environment. Moreover, it tells us how decisions are made by them. It tells us how animals make a judgment about an individual or animal that is around them. They need to make a decision to accept or reject an individual. In response to some sensory information, these decisions are made for instance appearance or smell of an incomer. To identify the correct mates, animals use this sensory information and make decisions. SDT and CAT models have been used widely to study these behaviors and show the sensitivity of the response. However, there is a need for further analysis regarding tests of the assumptions underlying SDT.
Another study performed by (van Ooijen-van der Linden et al., 2017) investigates that SDT is a tool that can be used to predict the academic achievements for admission procedures. Students are selected by looking at their past academic achievements and are enrolled in the university. From their past academic achievement, they predict their future academic achievement and they considered it as the best and most logical available predictor. In signal detection theory, the hit rate, miss rate, correction-rejection rate, and false rate model are used. The hit rate includes those students who are admitted successfully while the false-alarm rate includes unsuccessful admitted students.
Adequate specificity and sensitivity of admission tools are required by the Prediction accuracy of academic achievement for admission purposes. The predictive power is based on regression and correlational statistics. In this study, as a tool to cover the available information, signal detection theory is used. The selection outcomes are compared with the help of SDT. This theory also allows the development of tailor-made criteria. The study also investigated that by applying specific criteria, who would or would not have been admitted can be inspected. A comparison was made at an individual and a group level. The scores appear to suggest the admitting of the applicants. These applicants are predicted to be successful students. SDT is used for program-specific and admission-goal-specific. This theory is also used to set the criteria for admission purposes. According to their degree of usefulness, signal detection theory also helps to rank the students for the given programme. To make better-informed decisions, signal detection theory is convenient for the policy makers to evaluate admissions and to set specific criteria.
Both studies reveal that signal detection theory is used in psychological studies and it is the most convenient way to detect the pattern of decision-making. Additionally, signal detection theory also detects external stimuli and signals. For information processing in behavioral ecology, it provides clearer insights.
References
Sumner, C. J., & Sumner, S. (2020). Signal detection: Applying analysis methods from psychology to animal behaviour: Signal detection:psychology to ecology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 375(1802). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0480
van Ooijen-van der Linden, L., van der Smagt, M. J., Woertman, L., & te Pas, S. F. (2017). Signal detection theory as a tool for successful student selection. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(8), 1193–1207. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1241860
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.