Using the topic of your choice please write a 2000 word APA formatted paper with 5-7 citations of evidence backing your paper
Using the topic of your choice please write a 2000 word APA formatted paper with 5-7 citations of evidence backing your paper as long as it is a related subject to Global Transportation and Logistics Management. This paper SHOULD NOT have ever been turned into any class, symposium, or other academic area for a grade. See Rubric and checklist attached
The paper should have:
Title page
Table of contents
Abstract
Lit review
Body
Reference page
Research Paper
Graduate Level Rubric:
APUS Assignment Graduate Level Rubric 500-600 |
EXEMPLARY LEVEL
|
ACCOMPLISHED LEVEL
|
DEVELOPING LEVEL
|
BEGINNNIG LEVEL
|
TOTAL POINTS |
FOCUS AND THESIS |
Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements. 10 points |
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment. 7 points |
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the assignment. 5 points |
Exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key themes. Introduction of thesis is not clearly evident, and reader must look deeper to discover the focus of the writer. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or statements. 1 point |
/10 |
CONTENT AND SUBJECT KNOWLEDGE |
Student demonstrates proficient command of the subject matter in the assignment. Assignment shows an impressive level of depth of student’s ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence. 25 points |
Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of subject matter knowledge. 20 points |
The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. Whereas, there are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area. 15 points |
Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague or incomplete in various segments. Student presents concepts in isolation, and does not perceive to have a logical sequencing of ideas. 10 points |
/25 |
CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS |
Student demonstrates a higher-level of critical thinking necessary for 500-600 level work. Learner provides a strategic approach in presenting examples of problem solving or critical thinking, while drawing logical conclusions which are not immediately obvious. Student provides well-supported ideas and reflection with a variety of current and/or world views in the assignment. Student presents a genuine intellectual development of ideas throughout assignment. 25 points |
Student exhibits a good command of critical thinking skills in the presentation of material and supporting statements. Assignment demonstrates the student’s above average use of relating concepts by using a variety of factors. Overall, student provides adequate conclusions, with 2 or fewer errors. 20 points |
Student takes a common, conventional approach in guiding the reader through various linkages and connections presented in assignment. However, student presents a limited perspective on key concepts throughout assignment. Student appears to have problems applying information in a problem-solving manner. 15 points |
Student demonstrates beginning understanding of key concepts, but overlooks critical details. Learner is unable to apply information in a problem-solving fashion. Student presents confusing statements and facts in assignment. No evidence or little semblance of critical thinking skills. 10 points |
/25 |
ORGANIZATION OF IDEAS AND FORMAT |
Student thoroughly understands and excels in explaining all major points. An original, unique, and/or imaginative approach to overall ideas, concepts, and findings is presented. Overall format of assignment includes an appropriate introduction (or abstract), well- developed paragraphs, and conclusion. Finished assignment demonstrates student’s ability to plan and organize research in a logical sequence. Student uses at least of 5-7 references in assignment. 15 points |
Student explains the majority of points and concepts in the assignment. Learner demonstrates a good skill level in formatting and organizing material in assignment. Student presents an above average level of preparedness, with a few formatting errors. Assignment contains less than 5 resources. 10 points |
Learner applies some points and concepts incorrectly. Student uses a variety of formatting styles, with some inconsistencies throughout the paper. Assignment does not have a continuous pattern of logical sequencing. Student uses less than 3 sources or references. 7 points |
Assignment reveals formatting errors and a lack of organization. Student presents an incomplete attempt to provide linkages or explanation of key terms. The lack of appropriate references or source materials demonstrates the student’s need for additional help or training in this area. Student needs to review and revise the assignment. 1 point |
/15 |
WRITING CONVENTIONS (GRAMMAR & MECHANICS) |
Student demonstrates an excellent command of grammar, as well as presents research in a clear and concise writing style. Presents a thorough, extensive understanding of word usage. Student excels in the selection and development of a well-planned research assignment. Assignment is error-free and reflects student’s ability to prepare a high-quality academic assignment. 10 points |
Student provides an effective display of good writing and grammar. Assignment reflects student’s ability to select appropriate word usage and present an above average presentation of a given topic or issue. Assignment appears to be well written with no more than 3-5 errors. Student provides a final written product that covers the above-minimal requirements. 7 points |
Assignment reflects basic writing and grammar, but more than 5 errors. Key terms and concepts are somewhat vague and not completely explained by student. Student uses a basic vocabulary in assignment. Student’s writing ability is average, but demonstrates a basic understanding of the subject matter. 5 points |
Topics, concepts, and ideas are not coherently discussed or expressed in assignments. Student’s writing style is weak and needs improvement, along with numerous proofreading errors. Assignment lacks clarity, consistency, and correctness. Student needs to review and revise assignment. 1 point |
/10 |
USE OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY/ AND APPLICATIONS |
Student provides a high-caliber, formatted assignment. Learner exhibits excellent use of computer technology in the development of assignment. Quality and appropriateness of stated references demonstrate the student’s ability to use technology to conduct applicable research. Given assignment includes appropriate word processing, spreadsheet and/or other computer applications as part of the final product. 5 points |
Assignment presents an above-average use of formatting skills, with less than 3 errors. Students has a good command of computer applications to format information and/or figures in an appropriate format. Student uses at least two types of computer applications to produce a quality assignment. 4 points |
Student demonstrates a basic knowledge of computer applications. Appearance of final assignment demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format and present data. Resources used in assignment are limited. Student may need to obtain further help in the use of computer applications and Internet research. 3 points |
Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The student may need to take additional training or obtain help from the Educator Help Desk while preparing an assignment. Research and resources presented in the assignment are limited. Student needs to expand research scope. The number of formatting errors is not acceptable. 1 point |
/5 |
RESEARCH SKILL |
Student provides sophisticated synthesis of complex body of information in the preparation of assignment. Research provided by student contributes significantly to the development of the overall thesis. Student incorporates at least of 7-10 quality references in assignment. Student incorporates a variety of research resources and methodology in the preparation of assignment. 10 points |
Student achieves an above average synthesis of research, but interpretation is narrow in scope and description within assignment. Assignment contains less than 7 resources, and presents an average overview of key concepts. 7 points |
Assignment provides a basic, but borderline perspective of student’s research abilities. Student has incorporated less than 4 sources, which does not attempt to cover key elements of assignment. 5 points |
Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for assignment. The lack of appropriate references or source materials demonstrates the student’s need for additional help or training in this area. Student needs to review and revise the assignment. The paper is not of acceptable quality for graduate-level work. 1 point |
/10 |
TOTAL POINTS |
/100 |
,
APA Checklist
· Sections of an APA paper: title page, abstract (might be optional – check with instructor), text of paper and reference page.
· Running head is PERMANENT and aligned left margin on same line as page number (page number is flush right margin).
· Reads: Running head: <space> Portion of title no longer than12 words in length and contain no abbreviations.
All letters of title are capitalized. Example: Running head: LEARNING STYLES (title page only)
· Title page is always page 1. Thereafter, the title appears on each page in the header with only page numbers changing). Example: LEARNING STYLES .
· Center on page: Title of paper typed in upper & lower letters, followed by name, professor’s name and title of course.
· Begin paper by centering title at the top of page two (unless there is an Abstract or Table of Contents – number these first). The title is uppercase and lowercase letters and located directly under the 1” margin.
· Double space entire paper/Use 1 inch margin/Text is to be left aligned.
· Use 12 point font/ New Times Roman/black ink.
· Same font throughout with the exception of italicizing: (1) key term to emphasize (2) titles of books, periodicals, films, videos, TV shows and microfilm publications (there are more in-depth examples in APA Manual section 4.21).
· Numbers: 0-9 are written out while 10 and above are written as numbers (Exceptions: numbers expressing approximate lengths of time written as words ex: 1 hr 30 min; 12:30 a.m.; about 3 months ago).
· Punctuation when ending a Quote: If quotation is at the end of a sentence, close quote with quotation marks, cite the source in parentheses, and end with a period or other punctuation outside the final parenthesis.
· Avoid using “etc.” at the end of a list or exclamation point unless it is part of the quotation.
· Ampersand: If the citation is in parentheses, use the ampersand ('&') instead of the word “and” in text of paper. Always use ampersand (&) in tables, captions and on reference page.
· Capitalize first letter following a colon if clause is a complete sentence.
· Use complete sentences and avoid slang. Use Spell Checker and proofread paper.
· First sentence of a paragraph must be indented (with the exception of the Abstract).
· Do not use contractions (it’s = it is; won’t = will not).
· Always spell out acronym on first use. Example: APU = American Public University.
· Direct Quotes: must give page number. If no page numbers available, cite paragraph number using abbreviation para. (para. 4). If no page or paragraph numbers, cite heading and paragraph number where information found: (Discussion section, para. 2).
· Spell out all authors’ first time reference is cited. Use et al. in further references (ex: Smith et al., 2009) (Exception: Six or more authors use et al. first time).
· Quotes over 40 words must be indented and page number cited. Do not use quotation marks.
· The reference page is the last page (unless appendix). Insert page break at end of text preventing distortion when edits are made.
· Title of page: References (centered on page directly under the 1” margin). Do not underling, italicize or make bold.
· Cite references in text of paper and include sources on reference page. PLEASE NOTE: Wikis (like Wikipedia) cannot guarantee the verifiability or expertise of entries, therefore, are not considered scholarly sources. DO NOT USE WIKIPEDIA AS A SOURCE.
· References are in alphabetical order by author(s) last name on the reference page; list last name, then first and middle initial (if applicable) only. If no author is provided, use the first character of the title.
· When citing a book on the reference page, capitalize the first word of the title only (with the exception of proper names). Also, italicize the name of the book.
· Capitalize the FIRST word, the word after a colon, and all proper names in the title of books and articles.
· Italicize the name of books, journals, and magazines, but do NOT italicize the name of the article.
· Do not use the words Volume or Vol., Issue or Iss,. or Pages, p. or pp. on reference page.
· The name of the journal and volume number are italicized. Pay attention to punctuation.
· Remove hyperlink. When the web addresses turn blue and get underlined, right click them and “remove hyperlink”.
· Citing a source within a source (secondary sources) example: In-text—Bennett (as cited in Rudman, 1999) defined…
· Reference list: Rudman, R. (1999). Human resources management in New Zealand. (3rd ed.). Auckland, N.Z.:Addison Wesley Longman
· Citing references on reference page: use the hanging indent. Highlight the citations and press Ctrl T automatically formats.
· For electronic references, give the DOI, if assigned. DOI’s always begin with the number 10. Database names are no longer needed. If no DOI assigned, provide the URL of the journal or book publisher.
· Search for a DOI: Go to a free DOI lookup http://www.crossref.org/guestquery/ or http://www.crossref.org/SimpleTextQuery/
· Verifying a DOI: CrossRef.org and type in DOI (e.g., 10.1037/a0015859)
· Use 3rd person point of view (unless opinion paper) avoiding pronouns such as I, we, my, our (1st person) and you, yours, your, us, we (2ndperson). Deal with facts, thus, providing citations within paper and reference page. Focus on subject; not feelings about the subject. The use of 3rd person retains a formal tone: Academic writing is more formal than casual conversation.
· Cite all references in paper AND on reference page. If listed on reference page MUST have cited within paper.
· No retrieval dates or database name needed on reference page.
· Examples: (Not to scale)
References
Assembly of the minds. (2008, April 28). Mind and Body, 77(2), 526-528. doi:
10.1057/1024- 1027.29.4.123
Fenchel, J. (2009, October). Diving into the 21st century technology. School Talk, 15(1), 3-5.
Gelb, M. (2003). Discover your genius: How to think like history’s ten most revolutionary
minds. doi: 10.1045/2457-8953-85.2.452.
McKee, A., & Krueger, B. (2004). Learning multimedia principles. Journal of Multimedia
Technology, 21(4), 223-333. doi: 10.1234/5432-8989-34.8.456.
Rasmusen, A. J. (2008). Technology today . British Journal of Multimedia, 96(1), 171-177.
Stielow, F. J. (2003). Building digital archives. New York, NY: Neal-Shuman.
What’s your learning style. (2009). Retrieved from http://people.usd.edu/~bwjames/tut/learning-
style/
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.