This is the final evaluation of the lesson planning projects.? Recall that you will use the same two lesson plans you have pr
This is the final evaluation of the lesson planning projects. Recall that you will use the same two lesson plans you have previously submitted in 700.3 and 700.4. Please do not submit those plans in this project until you have successfully completed 700.4 and reached the course complete page.
This project, 700.5 continues with those same two plans, this time evaluating different parts of the lesson plan. Your coursework preceding this project will have prepared you for the evaluation criteria of this project. Using the feedback from your submissions in 700.3 and 700.4, and the knowledge gained in the preceding coursework revise and submit your plans for initial evaluation in this project.
As before, this project is much more detailed than lesson plans typically used in the classroom. The projects are designed to evaluate your skills in a comprehensive way; thus you are asked to provide much more detail than traditional plans so that your instructor is able to evaluate your skills in these areas. Please allow 3 – 5 days for scoring.
700.5 (this project) evaluates your knowledge and skills in the following areas:
- Questioning strategies and feedback
- Accommodations and modifications
- Assessing learning
- The overall plan
For 700.5, you will submit two complete lesson plans for feedback and final evaluation.
You may download the rubric here Download rubric hereto understand the expectations of the project. Read the rubric carefully as information has been added to the details of the "Assessment" section to include the scoring of the overall plan. The following exemplar lesson plan Download exemplar lesson planmay also be useful for you.
You must score at least 24 out of 30 points on each lesson plan to be successful. You may submit each plan until you reach the passing score, or until you have reached four re-submissions. When you have received passing scores on all lesson plans, please return to the home page of this course and select the "Course Complete" link to conclude the course.
TEACHERS OF TOMORROW LESSON PLAN FORMAT NAME: New Teacher SUBJECT: Grade 7 Language Arts
State Standard: (6) Reading/Comprehension of Literary Text/Fiction. Students understand, make inferences and draw
conclusions about the structure and elements of fiction and provide evidence from text to support their understanding.
Students are expected to:
(B) analyze the development of the plot through the internal and external responses of the characters, including their
motivations and conflicts; and
(C) analyze different forms of point of view, including first-person, third-person omniscient, and third-person limited.
LEARNING OBJECTIVE(S): The student will analyze the development of the plot through the internal and external responses of
the characters, including their motivations and conflicts, and analyze different forms of point of view, including first-person,
third-person omniscient, and third-person limited by selecting from a group of tasks that include creating a character analysis
cut-out or poster, acting out a character in a presentation, or pretending to be the author of a book during an interview.
ASSESSMENT: With the assistance of a peer, students will create a mock interview and presentation in which each student
will discuss how they created a character in the book. Students must identify the four aspects of characterization and how
they pertain to the character. Students will submit the interview and present to the class for evaluation.
MATERIALS and SETTING Small groups (3 – 4) determined by the teacher Notebook paper, pencil, colored pencils for ‘tweet sheet’, paper sack, objects for the bag Thirsty, Burger Wuss, The Chocolate Wars, Feed, and Refugee books
KEY VOCABULARY and ACADEMIC LANGUAGE
Review definitions for analyze, plot, internal/external responses, character, characterization, point of view
FOCUS ACTIVITY Students will create a character chart from two poems (“The Peanut Butter King” and “Sarah Cynthia Sylvia Stout Would Not Take the Garbage Out.” to review ‘static’ and ‘dynamic’ characterizations.
CONNECTION TO PRIOR LEARNING
Students will review the four different characterization concepts we have learned in the last two weeks.
OBJECTIVE STATEMENT Students, today we will continue our study of characterization, plot development and point of view. You will complete a project of your choice for the final assessment of your understanding of characterization and the role of plot and point of view in characterization.
PURPOSE OF LEARNING This is important for us to know so we can understand how writers utilize characters to impact story lines, and in real life, helps us recognize how other people impact our lives.
INSTRUCTIONAL STEPS Include: Step by step instructions Key points Directions to give
1. Review: I will review the different characterization concepts with the students prior to starting them on the activity. These concepts include antagonist and protagonist, dynamic vs. static, round vs. flat, and the difference in implied and explicit character traits.
2. Focus Activity: Students will complete the poetry activity to help them distinguish between static and dynamic characters.
3. Activity: Students will be completing three different learning stations that solidify some of the concepts of point of view and characterization. I will explain the station requirements for each station before releasing them to work.
**While students are working on this, I will be pulling some students for a tier one re-teach of the concepts before they complete an activity.
Station 1: Students will “become” a character from their group independent reading assignment (each group has been reading one of the following books: Thirsty, Burger Wuss, The Chocolate Wars, Feed, and Refugee). On a piece of notebook paper, students will write down 10 adjectives that describe themselves as the character from the book. Students will then list ten more adjectives for two other characters in the book from the point of view of the character they have become. Station 2: Students will be completing the “Tweet Sheet” activity. Students have to write tweets for different characters to point of view on the different conflicts in the short story. Students may choose any of the following short stories: “Luck,” “Old Man on the Bridge,” and “The Other Wife.” Students will annotate these stories on the iPads using Scrible. They can read independently to practice their comprehension, and then share their findings and notes as a group. After groups finish discussing, they will work on their “Tweet Sheets.” Station 3: Students will write paragraphs from their personal point of view about a particular object. They will then write a second paragraph from the point of view of that particular object. These objects will be in a paper sack so that they cannot see what they are grabbing. Tomorrow, students will take turns reading the paragraph from the point of view of their object.
4. Station Completion: Following completion of the stations activity, I will ask the Post-
Questions to clarify any misconceptions and prepare students for their project choices. This assignment will be due in two days.
5. Assessment: Handout project choices for students. Students will be completing a project of their choice for the final assessment of their understanding of characterization and the role of plot and point of view in characterization. Each project listed is differentiated to fit different learning styles. Here is a link to this assignment: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1G8HfB059W4VKAiSB8z9AHXT- Ash5eJw4/view?usp=sharing
6. Closure: To review, we will list three types of point of view and some of the characteristics of each type. Students will also be sharing what they remember about the different characterization concepts before we leave class. They will not have to write it down for an exit ticket today. I will take notes on who seems sure of their responses and who else might need Tier1/Tier 2 instruction.
7. Connect to Future Learning: Students will be using the concepts covered in this lesson as we begin our novel study of A Wrinkle in Time.
QUESTIONS FOR UNDERSTANDING Identify levels of Blooms
Pre-Questions: • What are some of the key differences between direct and indirect characterization?
Analyze • What are some ways to determine whether a trait is an implied or explicit
characteristic? Evaluate, Create • What are some of the different details that make up the characteristics of a
character? Remember Post Questions:
• What are you the things that you are most comfortable with discussing about characterization and its relationship to other literary elements moving forward? Evaluate
• What are some things that you think that we should practice more before we begin our study? Create
MODIFICATIONS/ ACCOMMODATIONS
Modifications: IEP and ELL students will have their sentence stem lists for the writing portions of the stations. IEP students will also work on their paragraphs with the teacher during study hall tutorials. Accommodations: IEP/504 Students will be able to type the written portion of these assignments.
RETEACH/EXTENSION Reteach: Students who are struggling with the Point of view and characterization concepts will be pulled during this lesson for tier one instruction. We will begin by having students list different adjectives to describe each of the members of the group. After listing the different adjectives, we will discuss whether these are implied traits or explicit traits. Since most will be explicit, I will be giving them some examples of implied traits by helping them find ways to assume certain traits (ex: they can assume that I am also a coach because I generally come to class in wind pants or they can assume that a class mate is on the basketball team because they wear tennis shoes every day). The final aspect of this lesson will be for students to read the short story “Old Man on the Bridge.” We will read together and take our notes on Scrible using the iPad. We will discuss the different characters in the story and label them as flat/round and tell whether they are static or dynamic characters. After we finish this, students will complete a “Tweet Sheet” for one of the characters in the book. Extension: Students who are ready to move on will be completing the creative writing characterization activity. This assignment is NOT for a grade, but it can be used to replace a student’s two lowest grades. Here is a link to that assignment: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1O8iP5ZjzhfOXuhISI24kaErOpenwl8ru/view?usp=shari ng
CLOSURE Review Connect to future learning
Review: We will list out the three types of Point of View and some of the characteristics of each type. Students will also be sharing what they remember about the different characterization concepts before we leave class. They will not have to write it down for an exit ticket today. I will take notes on who seems sure of their responses and who else might need tier 1/tier 2 instruction. Connection to Future Learning: Students will be using the concepts covered in this lesson as we begin our novel study of A Wrinkle in Time.
,
Criteria Ratings
QUESTIONING 10.0 pts 8.0 pts 6.0 pts 4.0 pts EXPERT: *Detailed evidence of planning for effective questioning *Specific goals for questioning identified (determination of prior knowledge, feedback, assessment, prompts for problem solving, etc.) *Explicitly requires students to go beyond “recall of facts” to engage in higher order thinking (Bloom’s Taxonomy), and creativity.
PROFICIENT: *Appropriate evidence of planning for effective questioning. * Goals for questioning identified and apparent (determination of prior knowledge, feedback, assessment, prompts for problem solving, etc.) *Encourages students to go beyond “recall of facts” to engage
DEVELOPING: *Some evidence of planning for effective questioning. * Goals for questioning are appropriate but may not be apparent (determination of prior knowledge, feedback, assessment, prompts for problem solving, etc.) *Some opportunity for students to go beyond “recall of facts” to engage in lesson content.
NOVICE: *Little or no evidence of planning for effective questioning. *Goals for questioning are uncertain (determination of prior knowledge, feedback, assessment, prompts for problem solving, etc.) *Limited opportunity for students to go beyond “recall of facts” to engage in lesson content
Criteria Ratings
ASSESSMENTS and THE OVERALL PLAN
10.0 pts 8.0 pts 6.0 pts 4.0 pts EXPERT: *Assessment provides detailed information about student learning. *Explicitly matches objective(s), learning activity and outcomes. *Detailed information about the type of assessment, formal: (constructed response/selected response/etc.) or informal: (observation, discussion, journal writing, etc.). *Assessment is adapted for diverse student needs and offers valid information about student learning. The overall plan flows smoothly from beginning to end; all aspects of the plan are aligned in rigor; explicitly detailed information is developed to address all learner needs.
PROFICIENT: *Assessment provides meaningful information about student learning. *Matches objective(s), learning activity and outcomes *Adequate information about the type of assessment, formal: (constructed response/selected response/etc.) or informal: (observation, discussion, journal writing, etc.). *Assessment includes some adaptations for diverse student needs
The overall plan is well- developed, flows smoothly from beginning to end; most aspects of the plan are aligned in rigor, detailed information is developed to address most learner needs.
DEVELOPING: *Assessment provides adequate information about student learning. *Is consistent with objective(s), learning activity and outcomes. *Adequate information about the type of assessment, formal: (constructed response/selected response/etc.) or informal: (observation, discussion, journal writing, etc.). The overall plan is adequately developed, flows somewhat smoothly from beginning to end; most aspects of the plan are adequately aligned in rigor, information is developed to address some learner needs.
NOVICE: *Assessment provides minimal information about student learning. *Is loosely connected to the objective(s) and learning activity and outcomes *Minimal information about the type of assessment, formal: (constructed response/selected response/etc.) or informal: (observation, discussion, journal writing, etc.). The overall plan is poorly developed, is dis-jointed with little flow from beginning to end; few aspects of the plan are adequately aligned in rigor, little to no information is developed to address learner needs.
ACCOMMODATIONS MODIFICATIONS
10.0 pts 8.0 pts 6.0 pts 4.0 pts EXPERT: *All accommodation needs have been specifically identified. *Accommodations (learning aids, graphic organizers, oral administration, etc.) and/or modifications (alternate material, activity or grade level content) are detailed and explicitly designed for the needs of the student population (ELL, Sped, GT, etc.) *Area for accommodation or modification (content, process, product, learning environment) has been specifically identified. *Accommodations and Modifications explicitly match skill deficits. Technology is efficiently utilized for accommodation and modification where appropriate. *Accommodation and/or modification allows for student learning of the content at the highest level appropriate for each individual
PROFICIENT: *Student needs are adequately identified. *Accommodations (learning aids, graphic organizers, oral administration, etc.) and/or modifications (alternate material, activity or grade level content) are detailed and appropriately designed for the needs of the student population (ELL, Sped, GT, etc.). *Area for accommodation or modification (content, process, product, learning environment) is apparent. *Accommodations/Modifica tions mostly align with skill deficits. *Where appropriate, technology may be used for accommodation/ modification. *When possible, accommodation and/or modification allows for student learning of the content at a level comparable to peers.
DEVELOPING: *Student needs are loosely identified. *Accommodations (learning aids, graphic organizers, oral administration, etc.) and/or modifications (alternate material, activity or grade level content) are listed and adequately based on the needs of the student population (ELL, Sped, GT, etc.) *Area for accommodation or modification (content, process, product, learning environment) is identified, but may not be specific. *Accommodations/modificati ons loosely match skill deficits. *Some evidence of technology use for accommodation/ modification may be apparent.
NOVICE: *Little or no evidence of accommodations *Accommodations (learning aids, graphic organizers, oral administration, etc.), or modifications (alternate material, activity or grade level content) as appropriate based on specific student needs (ELL, Sped, GT, etc.)
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.