Week 8 Assignment – System Implementation
Week 8 Assignment – System Implementation
Overview
This is the fourth in a series of five sequential assignments (the course project) in which you continue to act as the Chief Technology Officer (CTO) of a hypothetical, e-commerce start-up company of your design.
You have been working on delivering an information technology project plan in anticipation of the company relocating to a new facility.
• In the first course project deliverable, you created a project plan inception document and supporting Gantt chart.
• In the second course project deliverable, you developed the business requirements to be incorporated into the information systems design you are creating. You also updated your original supporting Gantt chart based on major and minor tasks identified in the business requirements document.
• In the third course project deliverable, you created an infrastructure design that considered the key elements of software, hardware, security, and business process flow for your e-commerce startup company. Once again, you updated your supporting Gantt chart to reflect the major and minor tasks uncovered while developing the infrastructure design.
This fourth course project deliverable focuses on the project’s construction phase. In this assignment, you will develop the system implementation plan document. This document will include the engineering, furnishing, and installation (EFI) technical aspects of your e-commerce company’s information systems infrastructure. This assignment consists of two parts:
Part 1: System Implementation Document
You will create an 8–10-page system implementation document that details the engineering, furnishing, and installation (EFI) technical aspects of your e-commerce company’s information systems infrastructure.
Part 2: Updated Gantt Chart
You will use Microsoft Project to once again update the supporting project Gantt chart begun in your first course project deliverable.
• You are not creating a new Gantt chart, only updating the one you created in the previous assignment with the major and minor tasks uncovered while creating the system implementation document.
Note:
• You are to create or assume all necessary assumptions to successfully complete this assignment.
• You must submit both parts as separate files to the assignment area. Label each file name according to the appropriate part.
Instructions
Part 1: System Implementation Document
You are to write an 8–10-page system implementation document in which you:
1. Use graphical tools to design the logical and physical layout of the planned e-commerce company’s information systems.
2. Use graphical tools to illustrate the possible placement of key infrastructure elements with external connectivity (Internet) and internal connectivity (firewalls, LAN).
3. Develop the bill of materials and tabulate it in a spreadsheet to include item, description, model number, and approximate cost.
4. Document the methodology and process to include the engineering, furnishing, and installation of the identified inventory.
5. Use three sources to support your writing.
• Choose sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate.
• Cite each source listed on your source page at least one time within your assignment.
• Access the library or review library guides for help with research, writing, and citation.
Part 2: Updated Gantt Chart
Use Microsoft Project to update the previously created Gantt chart with the major and minor tasks identified in the system implementation document.
Formatting
Note the following:
• The preferred method is for the narrative portion of your assignment to be typed, double-spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides.
• Include a cover page containing the assignment title, your name, your professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page is not included in the required page length.
• Include a source list page. Citations and references must follow SWS format. The source list page is not included in the required page length.
Rubric Requirements:
Use graphical
tools to design the logical and physical layout of the planned e-commerce company’s information systems. Points:
0 (0.00%)
Did not use graphical tools to design the logical and physical layout of the planned e-commerce company’s information systems. Points:
9.75 (6.50%)
Attempted to use graphical tools to design the logical and physical layout of the planned e-commerce company’s information systems, but diagram lacked readability, contained critical logic gaps in the design, failed to include key system implementation design elements, and/ or contained more than five incorrect or unrealistic data points. Points:
11.25 (7.50%)
Used graphical tools to design the logical and physical layout of the planned e-commerce company’s information systems, but diagram contained some logic gaps in the design, did not include some system implementation design elements, and/or contained 3–5 incorrect or unrealistic data points. Points:
12.75 (8.50%)
Used graphical tools to design the logical and physical layout of the planned e-commerce company’s information systems, but diagram did not include minor system implementation design elements and/or contained 1–2 incorrect or unrealistic data points. Points:
15 (10.00%)
Used graphical tools to design the logical and physical layout of the planned e-commerce company’s information systems.
Use graphical tools to illustrate the possible placement of key infrastructure elements with external connectivity (Internet) and internal connectivity (firewalls, LAN). Points:
0 (0.00%)
Did not use graphical tools to illustrate the possible placement of key infrastructure elements with external and internal connectivity. Points:
19.5 (13.00%)
Attempted to use graphical tools to illustrate the possible placement of key infrastructure elements with external and internal connectivity, but diagram lacked readability, addressed external or internal connectivity but not both, failed to address key infrastructure elements, left out critical details, and/or contained more than five incorrect or unrealistic data points. Points:
22.5 (15.00%)
Used graphical tools to illustrate the possible placement of key infrastructure elements with external and internal connectivity but did not address some infrastructure elements, left out some details, and/or contained 3–5 incorrect or unrealistic data points. Points:
25.5 (17.00%)
Used graphical tools to illustrate the possible placement of key infrastructure elements with external and internal connectivity, but left out minor details and/or contained 1–2 incorrect or unrealistic data points. Points:
30 (20.00%)
Used graphical tools to illustrate the possible placement of key infrastructure elements with external connectivity and internal connectivity.
Develop the bill of materials and tabulate it in a spreadsheet to include item, description, model number and approximate cost. Points:
0 (0.00%)
Did not develop the bill of materials and tabulate it in a spreadsheet to include item, description, model number, and approximate cost. Points:
19.5 (13.00%)
Attempted to develop the bill of materials and tabulate it in a spreadsheet to include item, description, model number, and approximate cost, but bill of materials did not account for critical items necessary for project implementation, left out critical item information, and/or contained more than five incorrect or unrealistic data points. Points:
22.5 (15.00%)
Developed the bill of materials and tabulated it in a spreadsheet to include item, description, model number, and approximate cost, but bill of materials did not account for some project implementation items, left out some item information, and/or contained 3–5 incorrect or unrealistic data points. Points:
25.5 (17.00%)
Developed the bill of materials and tabulated it in a spreadsheet to include item description, model number, and approximate cost, but bill of materials did not account for minor project implementation items, left out minor item information, and/or contained 1–2 incorrect or unrealistic data points. Points:
30 (20.00%)
Developed the bill of materials and tabulated it in a spreadsheet to include item, description, model number, and approximate cost.
Document the methodology and process to include the engineering, furnishing, and installation of the identified inventory. Points:
0 (0.00%)
Did not document the methodology and process to include the engineering, furnishing, and installation of the identified inventory. Points:
14.625 (9.75%)
Attempted to document the methodology and process to include the engineering, furnishing, and installation of the identified inventory, but documentation addressed engineering, furnishing, or installation, but not all three, left out critical details, and/or contained more than five incorrect or unrealistic data points. Points:
16.875 (11.25%)
Documented the methodology and process to include the engineering, furnishing, and installation of the identified inventory, but documentation left out some details and/or contained 3–5 incorrect or unrealistic data points. Points:
19.125 (12.75%)
Documented the methodology and process to include the engineering, furnishing, and installation of the identified inventory, but documentation left out minor details and/or contained 1–2 incorrect or unrealistic data points. Points:
22.5 (15.00%)
Documented the methodology and process to include the engineering, furnishing, and installation of the identified inventory.
Use Microsoft Project to update the previously created Gantt chart with the major and minor tasks identified in the system implementation document. Points:
0 (0.00%)
Did not use Microsoft Project to update the previously created Gantt chart with the major and minor tasks identified in the system implementation document. Points:
19.5 (13.00%)
Attempted to use Microsoft Project to update the previously created Gantt chart with the major and minor tasks identified in the system implementation document, but more than five major and minor tasks, subtasks, resources, or time related to the project were missing. Points:
22.5 (15.00%)
Used Microsoft Project to update the previously created Gantt chart with the major and minor tasks identified in the system implementation document, but 3–5 major and minor tasks, subtasks, resources, or time related to the project were missing. Points:
25.5 (17.00%)
Used Microsoft Project to update the previously created Gantt chart with the major and minor tasks identified in the system implementation document, but 1–2 minor tasks, subtasks, resources, or time related to the project were missing. Points:
30 (20.00%)
Used Microsoft Project to update the previously created Gantt chart with the major and minor tasks identified in the system implementation document.
Use three sources to support your writing. Points:
0 (0.00%)
No references provided. Points:
4.875 (3.25%)
Does not meet the required number of references; all references are poor quality choices. Points:
5.625 (3.75%)
Meets the required number of references; some references are poor quality choices. Points:
6.375 (4.25%)
Meets the number of required references; most references are high quality choices. Points:
7.5 (5.00%)
Meets or exceeds the number of required references; all references are high quality choices.
Clarity, organization, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements. Points:
0 (0.00%)
Serious and persistent errors in clarity, organization, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements (more than eight errors). Points:
9.75 (6.50%)
Persistent errors in clarity, organization, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements (7–8 errors). Points:
11.25 (7.50%)
Partially free of errors in clarity, organization, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements (5–6 errors). Points:
12.75 (8.50%)
Mostly free of errors in clarity, organization, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements (3–4 errors). Points:
15 (10.00%)
Error-free or almost error-free in terms of clarity, organization, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements (0–2 errors).
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
