For this assignment, you will first read and analyze the Graham v. Connor court decision

Many issues in the United States are focused on the application of force in the field of law enforcement. Questions have been raised as to whether criminal justice professionals are applying the least amount of force necessary to gain compliance from an unwilling subject. Because of several recent controversies surrounding the use of deadly force and the treatment of individuals in police custody, many members of society have been extremely critical of the use of force. These controversial issues have created a negative public perception of law enforcement officers, and there have been demonstrations and calls for reform in both the training and hiring of police officers.

For this assignment, you will first read and analyze the Graham v. Connor court decision. This decision is the seminal case that articulates when and how use-of-force situations will be reviewed and judged. As you read the case, consider who the key stakeholders are (police officers, police departments, citizens, etc.) in the controversy and how this issue impacts the field of criminal justice.

Prompt
After reading the case, write a brief in which you address the elements listed below. This case brief will help you address the impact of similar decisions in studying your own issue analysis for the final project. Set up your brief as the sample case brief is set up, and include the answers to the questions in the Analysis section of the brief.

Facts: State the facts of the case and why the case went to trial.
Issue: State what is at issue in the case.
Ruling: State the court’s ruling in the case.
Analysis: This section contains the bulk of the brief. In your analysis, address the following:
In this case, what standard did the court use to determine whether the use of force was reasonable? For instance, what did the court say about judging the objective reasonableness of the use of force?
What perspective did the court use in determining whether the officer acted appropriately in the use of force? What did the court say about using hindsight to determine objective reasonableness?
What strategies do you believe should be employed to make sure officers are applying the correct amount of force in any given situation?
Analyze the connection between the issue of use of force and what criminological theory contributed to the understanding—or misunderstanding—of these issues.
Conclusion: Conclude the case brief by summarizing your analysis.
Reference your textbook reading as well as the case material in your submission. To facilitate this task, refer to the Sample Case Brief document.

What to Submit
Your submission should be at least 1 page in length (in addition to title and reference pages). It should use single spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Follow APA style for in-text citations and the reference list.

Case Brief Rubric
Criteria
Exceeds Expectations (100%)
Meets Expectations (90%)
Partially Meets Expectations (70%)
Does Not Meet Expectations (0%)
Value
Facts
Exceeds expectations and facts are detailed and specific
States the facts of the case and why the case went to trial
States the facts of the case and why the case went to trial, but statement lacks detail or contains inaccuracies
Does not state the facts of the case or why the case went to trial
15
Issue
Exceeds expectations substantiated with evidence from the case to support statement
States what is at issue in the case
States what is at issue in the case, but statement lacks detail or contains inaccuracies
Does not state what is at issue in the case
7
Ruling
Exceeds expectations substantiated with evidence from the case to support statement
States the court’s ruling in the case
States the court’s ruling in the case, but statement lacks detail or contains inaccuracies
Does not state the court’s ruling in the case
7
Analysis: Standard
Exceeds expectations substantiated with evidence from the case to support identification
Identifies what standard the court used to determine whether the use of force was reasonable
Identifies what standard the court used to determine whether the use of force was reasonable, but identification contains inaccuracies
Does not identify what standard the court used to determine whether the use of force was reasonable
15
Analysis: Perspective
Exceeds expectations substantiated with citations from the case to support description
Identified the perspective the court used to determine whether the officer acted appropriately in the use of force
Identifies the perspective the court used to determine whether the officer acted appropriately in the use of force, but identification lacks detail or contains inaccuracies
Does not identify the perspective the court used to determine whether the officer acted appropriately in the use of force
15
Analysis: Strategies
Exceeds expectations substantiated with research-based evidence to support strategies
Identifies which strategies should be employed to make sure officers are applying the correct amount of force in any given situation
Identifies strategies to be employed, but identified strategies will not help to make sure officers are applying the correct amount of force in any given situation
Does not identify which strategies should be employed to make sure officers are applying the correct amount of force in any given situation
15
Analysis: Criminological Theory
Exceeds expectations substantiated with examples of criminological theory to support connection
Analyzes the connection between the issue of use of force and which criminological theory contributed to the understanding (or misunderstanding) of these issues
Analyzes the connection between the issue of use of force and which criminological theory contributed to the understanding (or misunderstanding) of these issues, but analysis lacks detail or contains inaccuracies
Does not analyze the connection between the issue of use of force and which criminological theory contributed to the understanding (or misunderstanding) of these issues
15
Conclusion
Exceeds expectations substantiated with evidence from the case to support a conclusion
Provides a conclusion that summarizes the analysis
Provides a conclusion that summarizes the analysis, but conclusion contains inaccuracies
Does not provide a conclusion
7
Clear Communication
Exceeds expectations with an intentional use of language that promotes a thorough understanding
Consistently and effectively communicates in an organized way to a specific audience
Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but communication is inconsistent or ineffective in a way that negatively impacts understanding
Shows no evidence of consistent, effective, or organized communication
2
Citations and Attributions
Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with few or no minor errors
Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with consistent minor errors
Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with major errors
Does not use citations for ideas requiring attribution
2

Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers

Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.

Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS

Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?

Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.

We write plagiarism Free Content

Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.

Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.