A lesson can be perfectly planned, but if not implemented correctly it may not be effective for learning. Gathering feedback from others regarding implement
A lesson can be perfectly planned, but if not implemented correctly it may not be effective for learning. Gathering feedback from others regarding implementation can lead to improved practices for new and experienced teachers. Observing others and being observed is a great way to provide feedback and gather additional data on a lesson’s effectiveness for supporting students in meeting the objective.
Allocate at least 2 hours in an inclusive K-12 classroom that includes students with disabilities for this field experience.
Implement the activity developed with your mentor teacher in Clinical Field Experience B or another activity using technology with the whole class or a small group of students. Be sure to utilize the differentiation strategies you and your mentor teacher discussed to meet the needs of all students in the class/group.
Following the implementation, seek feedback from your mentor teacher. Discuss the following:
- How the implementation went, include whether the students met the objective of the activity. Discuss how you made this determination.
- What you and your mentor felt was effective, and what you would do differently next time.
- The effectiveness of the differentiation and how the technology supported students during the activity.
Spend any remaining field experience hours observing or assisting the teacher in providing instruction and support to the class.
Following the implementation and discussion, write a 250-500 word reflection. Summarize the implementation of the activity and feedback from your mentor teacher. How did the technology used in the activity help meet the needs of all the students in the group or class? What parts of the lesson were effective and what would you change for next time? Did the students meet the objectives of the activity and how did you know?
APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Clinical Field Experience C: Implementing Differentiated Activities – Rubric
Reflection 8 points
Criteria Description
Reflection
5. Target 8 points
Summary of the implementation of the activity and feedback provided by the
mentor teacher is thorough and specific.
4. Acceptable 6.96 points
Summary of the implementation of the activity and feedback provided by the
mentor teacher is detailed.
3. Approaching 5.92 points
Summary of the implementation of the activity and feedback provided by the
mentor teacher is vague.
2. Insufficient 5.52 points
Summary of the implementation of the activity and feedback provided by the
mentor teacher is inadequate.
1. No Submission 0 points
Not addressed.
Collapse All
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Technology Use 8 points
Criteria Description
Technology Use
5. Target 8 points
How the technology used helped to meet the needs of all students in the class or
group is insightfully discussed.
4. Acceptable 6.96 points
How the technology used helped to meet the needs of all students in the class or
group is competently discussed.
3. Approaching 5.92 points
How the technology used helped to meet the needs of all students in the class or
group is lacking detail.
2. Insufficient 5.52 points
How the technology used helped to meet the needs of all students in the class or
group is unclear.
1. No Submission 0 points
Not addressed.
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Effectiveness 8 points
Criteria Description
Effectiveness
5. Target 8 points
Reflection thoughtfully discussed what was effective about the activity and what
would be changed for next time. Proficient reasoning is provided.
4. Acceptable 6.96 points
Reflection clearly discussed what was effective about the activity and what would be
changed for next time. Relevant reasoning is provided.
3. Approaching 5.92 points
Reflection vaguely discussed what was effective about the activity and what would
be changed for next time. Weak reasoning is provided.
2. Insufficient 5.52 points
Reflection ineffectively discussed what was effective about the activity and what
would be changed for next time. Fails to provide reasoning.
1. No Submission 0 points
Not addressed.
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Objectives 8 points
Criteria Description
Objectives
5. Target 8 points
Whether or not students met the objectives is expertly discussed and sound
reasoning is provided.
4. Acceptable 6.96 points
Whether or not students met the objectives is discussed and reasoning is provided.
3. Approaching 5.92 points
Whether or not students met the objectives is unclearly discussed and reasoning is
not provided.
2. Insufficient 5.52 points
Whether or not students met the objectives is incomprehensible.
1. No Submission 0 points
Not addressed.
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Organization 4 points
Criteria Description
Organization
5. Target 4 points
The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas
that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides
the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.
4. Acceptable 3.48 points
The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The
content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.
3. Approaching 2.96 points
The content is adequately organized, generally providing the audience with a sense
of the main idea.
2. Insufficient 2.76 points
The content is unorganized with and indiscernible sequence. The ideas presented
are compartmentalized, and the main idea is unclear.
1. No Submission 0 points
Not addressed.
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
