This discussion represents the third and final step in a three-step discussion series where you will choose your pathophysiology adventure to analyze a

General Instructions 

This discussion represents the third and final step in a three-step discussion series where you will choose your pathophysiology adventure to analyze and present to the class. You will continue to explore the disease process that you chose in Week 2. In this final step of the discussion series, you will present the case study that you created in Week 5 on your chosen disease process from Week 2 to the class using the required templateLinks to an external site.. Your presentation will be recorded in video format using Kaltura and should be presented as if you are teaching the client who was just diagnosed with your chosen condition from Week 2 and their family. You will then do a peer review for another student who chose a different condition. This link Links to an external site.can provide information on how to use Kaltura to record your presentation after signing in with your Chamberlain University student credentials.

Include the following sections:  

1. Application of Course Knowledge: Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail.  

1. Prepare a presentation using the required templateLinks to an external site.. The presentation should incorporate the case study you created in Week 5 and the pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis of your selected condition as if you are teaching it to the client in the case study. For images of the client for the case study, free stock images are available from Adobe StockLinks to an external site..  
2. Record your presentation in a video format (~2-5 min) using Kaltura. Ensure clarity in the audio and visual elements of the presentation. 
3. Submit the Kaltura recording link of your presentation in your discussion post.  
4. After posting your presentation link, watch the presentation of one of your classmates with a different condition. Provide a response to their post offering constructive feedback focusing on the accuracy of the information, their presentation skills, and whether the presentation is appropriately targeted to the client in the case study. 

2. Integration of Evidence: Integrate relevant scholarly sources as defined by program expectationsLinks to an external site.:  

1. Cite a scholarly source in the initial post. 
2. Cite a scholarly source in one faculty response post. 
3. Cite a scholarly source in one peer post. 
4. Accurately analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles from evidence with no more than one short quote (15 words or less) for the week.  
5. Include a minimum of two different scholarly sources per week. Cite all references and provide references for all citations. 

3. Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue: Engage peers and faculty by asking questions and offering new insights, applications, perspectives, information, or implications for practice.