Create a comprehensive case study analysis that examines a specific patient care scenario or practice initiative within their clinical sett
Summative Assessment
Create a comprehensive case study analysis that examines a specific patient care scenario or practice initiative within their clinical setting. The analysis will require the identification and evaluation of risks, the exploration of relevant ethical dilemmas, the application of collaborative strategies, and the analysis of cost-effectiveness in relation to health outcomes. Students will synthesize their findings into a structured document that aligns with professional standards and ethical guidelines
- Requirement: Risk Assessment and Collaborative Strategies
- Identify a specific practice initiative or clinical scenario. Conduct a thorough risk assessment, discussing potential ethical dilemmas and the impact of emerging technologies. Describe collaborative practice strategies that could mitigate identified risks.
- Requirement: Synthesis of Patient Care Delivery
- Synthesize the delivery of patient care in the context of emerging practice problems and ethical dilemmas associated with your chosen initiative. Discuss how new diagnostic and therapeutic technologies may influence care delivery and ethical considerations.
- Requirement: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
- Analyze the cost-effectiveness of the practice initiative by estimating both the direct and indirect costs while detailing potential improvements in health outcomes. Include specific metrics for evaluation and link findings to the risk assessment and ethical considerations discussed earlier.
Document Type/Template
- Word Document at least 6 pages
- Utilize APA guidelines, including a title page, in-text citations, and a reference list as appropriate.
C1: Summative Assessment Rubric
Criteria Ratings
Writing Mechanics
MASTERY Only minimal spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors are present (1-2 errors). The overall sentence structure is well developed throughout, and paragraphs are fully developed with consistent style and clear
PROFICIENT Minor spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors present, and/or sentence structure lacks minor elements of professional writing, and/or paragraphs are consistently developed. (3- 4 errors)
DEVELOPING Minimal spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors present, and/or sentence structure lacks elements of professional writing, and/or paragraphs are not consistently developed. (5- 7 errors)
EMERGING Multiple spelling grammar and/or punctuation errors present and/or sentence structure does not meet professional writing standards, and/or paragraphs are minimally developed. (more than 7-9 errors)
NOT EVIDENT Significant spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors present, and/or sentence structure does not meet professional writing standards, and/or paragraphs are poorly developed. (10 or more errors)
APA formatting
MASTERY Citations, references, and formatting follow APA style guide, with only one or two minor errors.
PROFICIENT Citations, references, and formatting follow APA style guide, with more than 2 errors, but they are minor.
DEVELOPING APA style is demonstrated with some consistency, but the majority of the citation, references, and/or formatting is not correct.
EMERGING Formatting, citations, and/or references, are attempted, but do not follow APA style guidelines consistently.
NOT EVIDENT Formatting, citations, and references are not included, or do not follow appropriate APA style guide.
Sources MASTERY The use of sources was consistent throughout the document in all areas to support claims and/or statements in the artifact.
PROFICIENT In most areas, sources were consistently used throughout the submission to support claims and/or statements in the artifact.
DEVELOPING Sources were occasionally used to support some claims and/or statements in the artifact, but statements were not consistently supported with
EMERGING Minimal usage of sources present in the artifact, and/or the overall communication lacked appropriate research support.
NOT EVIDENT Sources were not used to support major statements and/or claims, where needed in the artifact
Criteria Ratings sources throughout.
Project Management Plan: Risk Management Plan
MASTERY A summary is written and well organized with details to support the paper.
PROFICIENT A summary is written with good, organized information, but could use more detail.
DEVELOPING A summary is written with good information, but has little detail and/or is vague.
EMERGING The Risk Management Plan was unclear. Assignment details were minimally addressed
NOT EVIDENT The Risk Management Plan was not included. Not all assignment details were addressed.
Ethical Implications
MASTERY Ethical implications are addressed from a study / participant view point and a study findings / community viewpoint with detailed description of the ethical implication and the outcome of those implications.
PROFICIENT Ethical implications information was addressed with good information for the study.
DEVELOPING Ethical implications information was addressed, but wasn’t always aligned with the study, participants, or community.
EMERGING Brief mention of ethical implications, but is not tied to the topic of the study.
NOT EVIDENT Limited or no ethical implications provided.
Application MASTERY The reflective paper effectively explains the experience of collaborating with a Subject Matter Expert. The paper effectively highlights the application of ADA and
PROFICIENT The reflective paper explains the experience of collaborating with a Subject Matter Expert. The paper highlights the application of ADA and accessibility considerations
DEVELOPING The reflective paper somewhat explains the experience of collaborating with a Subject Matter Expert. The paper somewhat highlights the application of ADA and
EMERGING The reflective paper minimally explains the experience of collaborating with a Subject Matter Expert. The paper minimally highlights the application of ADA and
NOT EVIDENT The reflective paper does not explain the experience of collaborating with a Subject Matter Expert. The paper excludes highlights on the application of ADA and accessibility
Criteria Ratings accessibility considerations in the Digital Lesson design.
in the Digital Lesson design.
accessibility considerations in the Digital Lesson design.
accessibility considerations in the Digital Lesson design.
considerations in the Digital Lesson design.
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
