For this final assignment, you will be tasked to review your work in the Topic 3 case study and continue to analyze the case to best determine spiritual care
For this final assignment, you will be tasked to review your work in the Topic 3 case study and continue to analyze the case to best determine spiritual care interventions throughout their plan of care. In particular, the focus will be on the Christian application of the four principles, as well as appropriate options in providing a patient with spiritual care.
Based on the chart you completed and questions you answered in the Topic 3 about "Case Study: Healing and Autonomy" (attached) and reading the topic Resources, complete the "Patient's Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis" (attached) document, in which you will analyze the case study in relation to the following:
- Patient autonomy
- Christian perspective and actions related to sickness and health, principles of beneficence, and nonmaleficence
- Spiritual needs assessment and appropriate interventions for all involved in providing care
- Accountability that would demonstrate an ethical manner that reflects professional standards of practice and person-centered care and participatory approach to care
Note: Participatory approach to care calls for involving stakeholders, particularly the participants in a program or those affected by a given policy, in specific aspects of the evaluation process. The approach covers a wide range of different types of participation, and stakeholders can be involved at any stage of the impact evaluation process, including its design, data collection, analysis, reporting, and managing a study.
Also, person-centered care is "empowering people to take charge of their own health rather than being passive recipients of services" (WHO, 2021). This care strategy is based on the belief that patient views, input, and experiences can help improve overall health outcomes.
Support your response using ONLY the following Topic 5 Resources (all attached):
- Chapter 5 from the textbook Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values and Decision-Making in Health Care
- "Assessing Spiritual Health Through the Use of Spiritual Health Assessment Tools: Indications for End-of-Life Care"
- "Faith-Sensitive End-of-Life Care for Children, Young People, and Their Families"
Case Study: Healing and Autonomy
Mike and Joanne are the parents of James and Samuel, identical twins born 8 years ago. James is currently suffering from acute glomerulonephritis, kidney failure. James was originally brought into the hospital for complications associated with a strep throat infection. The spread of the A streptococcus infection led to the subsequent kidney failure. James’s condition was acute enough to warrant immediate treatment. Usually cases of acute glomerulonephritis caused by strep infection tend to improve on their own or with an antibiotic. However, James also had elevated blood pressure and enough fluid buildup that required temporary dialysis to relieve.
The attending physician suggested immediate dialysis. After some time of discussion with Joanne, Mike informs the physician that they are going to forego the dialysis and place their faith in God. Mike and Joanne had been moved by a sermon their pastor had given a week ago and also had witnessed a close friend regain mobility when she was prayed over at a healing service after a serious stroke. They thought it more prudent to take James immediately to a faith healing service instead of putting James through multiple rounds of dialysis. Yet, Mike and Joanne agreed to return to the hospital after the faith healing services later in the week, and in hopes that James would be healed by then.
Two days later the family returned and was forced to place James on dialysis, as his condition had deteriorated. Mike felt perplexed and tormented by his decision to not treat James earlier. Had he not enough faith? Was God punishing him or James? To make matters worse, James's kidneys had deteriorated such that his dialysis was now not a temporary matter and was in need of a kidney transplant. Crushed and desperate, Mike and Joanne immediately offered to donate one of their own kidneys to James, but they were not compatible donors. Over the next few weeks, amidst daily rounds of dialysis, some of their close friends and church members also offered to donate a kidney to James. However, none of them were tissue matches.
James’s nephrologist called to schedule a private appointment with Mike and Joanne. James was stable, given the regular dialysis, but would require a kidney transplant within the year. Given the desperate situation, the nephrologist informed Mike and Joanne of a donor that was an ideal tissue match, but as of yet had not been considered—James’s brother Samuel.
Mike vacillates and struggles to decide whether he should have his other son Samuel lose a kidney or perhaps wait for God to do a miracle this time around. Perhaps this is where the real testing of his faith will come in? Mike reasons, “This time around it is a matter of life and death. What could require greater faith than that?”
© 2020. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
image1.png
,
Patient's Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis
Student Name:
After reviewing the Topic 3 "Case Study: Healing and Autonomy" chart and evaluation you completed and reading the topic Resources, respond to the following, using only citations from the case and topic Resources:
1. Based on the case and topic Resources, in 200-250 words, should the physician allow Mike to continue making decisions that seem to him to be irrational and harmful to James, or would that mean a disrespect of a patient's autonomy? Explain your rationale.
2. Based on the case and topic Resources, in 500-700 words, how ought a Christian think about sickness and health? How should a Christian think about medical intervention? What should Mike as a Christian do? How should he reason about trusting God and treating James in relation to what is truly honoring the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence in James's care?
3. Based on the case and topic Resources, in 200-250 words, how would a spiritual needs assessment help the physician assist Mike to determine the appropriate interventions for James and for his family or others involved in his care?
4. Based on the case and topic Resources, in 250-300 words, how would accountability for James be demonstrated in an ethical manner that reflects professional standards of practice and a patient-centered care and participatory approach to care? Consider the same standards of practice for his twin brother Samuel who may become a patient alongside his brother as the kidney donor.
References
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
image1.png
,
The International Journal of Health, Wellness, and Society Volume 11, Issue 1, 2021, https://healthandsociety.com © Common Ground Research Networks, Cheryl Green, All Rights Reserved. Permissions: cgscholar.com/cg_support ISSN: 2156-8960 (Print), ISSN: 2156-9053 (Online) https://doi.org/10.18848/2156-8960/CGP/v11i01/189-197 (Article)
Assessing Spiritual Health through the Use of Spiritual Health Assessment Tools:
Indications for End-of-Life Care Cheryl Green,1 Southern Connecticut State University, USA
Abstract: Nurses deliver patient-centered care daily to end-of-life patients and provide emotional support for family members and significant others. Compassionate care that embraces the alleviation of suffering, the recognition of values and self-determination, and non-judgmentally provides support to the dying, is the distinctive feature of end-of- life care provided by nursing professionals. Therefore, like physical and mental health assessments that are provided by nursing professionals, spiritual health assessments must also be provided. Spiritual health encompasses an assessment of one’s experience of spiritual distress. Spiritual distress is the disturbance within values and belief systems that would otherwise be a source of hope and peace for the affected person(s). A spiritual health assessment, implemented during end-of-life care, can determine whether spiritual distress is absent or present. Upon the determination of the necessity of patients’ spiritual needs, interventions can be facilitated by the nurse and collaborating healthcare team members to address the patient’s spiritual needs(s), hence ensuring that patients can die peacefully.
Keywords: Spiritual Health Assessment, Patients, Nurses, End-of-Life, Care
Introduction
ursing is a profession of caritas that is profoundly spiritual. In the care of patients, the licensed professional nurse recognizes that death is a normal occurrence that co-exists within the natural order of the continuum of life (ANA 2019). The physiological and
psychological needs of patients are met with vulnerability to sickness and cellular deterioration. Healthcare institutions are required by organizations such as the Joint Commission and the American Nurses Association to provide care and offer services that meet the spiritual needs of patients. Nurses play an important role in addressing the spiritual needs of patients. Spiritual health is defined by this author as the process of assessment for the absence or presence of patients’ experiencing spiritual distress (disturbances within value and belief systems that would otherwise be a source of peace and hope to the affected person(s)).
Hypothetical Scenario
The following scenario is a hypothetical patient case. This hypothetical patient case is not based on an actual person, family, or event. The purpose of this hypothetical patient case is to provide understanding of the provision of end-of-life care delivery and how a spiritual health assessment tool may bring clarity to patients’ end-of-life spiritual health needs.
Clinical Application Scenario
A nurse is providing end-of-life care to a patient diagnosed with Stage 4 pancreatic cancer. The patient confides in the nurse that while undergoing chemotherapy, he found out that his wife of thirty years was having an affair. The patient shares, “I am having difficulty forgiving my
1 Corresponding Author: Cheryl Green, 501 Crescent Street, Jennings Hall, Southern Connecticut State University Department of Nursing, New Haven, Connecticut, 06515, USA. email: [email protected]
N
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH, WELLNESS, AND SOCIETY
wife.” The nurse asks the patient would he like to discuss the situation with a therapist or social worker. The patient becomes tearful and refuses to disclose any further information.
The nurse’s inquiry for behavioral health services, while well-intended for this dying patient, was not appropriate for this particular situation. Forgiveness is a spiritual issue. Given the brevity of life for this patient dying of cancer, the provision of comfort and compassionate care is the goal, and one that can be immediately addressed through a spiritual health assessment.
Nursing Assessment
Conducting physical and mental health assessments are both diagnostic and assessment areas that nurses engage within while admitting patients for healthcare services in inpatient and outpatient settings. Spiritual health assessments are of equal importance for patients. The Joint Commission (TJC 2021), as well as the American Nurses Association (ANA 2001, 2003, 2004), recognizes the value of spiritual care for patients seeking health care and/or experiencing a healthcare crisis.
The ANA standards for nursing practice assist the professional nurse in making decisions that are morally congruent with maintaining the dignity and well-being of patients who are the recipients of health care from nurses. Within codes of ethics and standards, healthcare associations and disciplines acknowledge the necessity of spiritual care for patients (Sessanna, et al. 2011; Zehtab and Adib-Hajbaghery 2014).
Identifying the Problem
Currently, there are no standardized clinical instruments that are universally used to assess the spiritual needs of patients admitted to healthcare institutions. Standardization of instrumentation that is used to assess patients experiencing spiritual health concerns may identify immediate referral needs for counseling, mental health, or chaplaincy services. When nurses are trained to use spiritual health instrumentation that can assess patients’ spiritual healthcare needs, patients can receive spiritual support in a timely manner and holistic care is delivered. Spiritual health assessment provided within the context of end-of-life care can assist these patients in the midst of the continuum of life to die with respect and self-determination.
Institutional Review Board and Conflict of Interest
Institutional review board (IRB) approval for this evidenced-based practice (EBP) project was obtained from Southern Connecticut State University and Gaylord Specialty Healthcare during the fall of 2016. The project was implemented on the grounds of Gaylord Specialty Healthcare during the spring of 2017. No conflicts of interests were identified.
Purpose of the Study
The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of two spiritual health assessment tools in helping to identify the spiritual needs of patients and increase awareness of nursing professionals as to the importance of initiating referrals to chaplaincy when patients’ spiritual health needs are identified. Two spiritual health assessment tools were developed by this project implementer with the consultation of Rabbi Jeffery Silberman of the Bridgeport Hospital, an affiliate of the Yale-New Haven Health System. Spiritual Health Assessment Tool 1 used language that was non-spiritually based—such as feel, judged, and worry—while Spiritual Health Assessment Tool 2 used language that was spiritually-based, such as God, Heaven, and sin.
190
GREEN: ASSESSING SPIRITUAL HEALTH THROUGH SPIRITUAL HEALTH ASSESSMENT TOOLS
Design
This study used a quantitative and qualitative approach in the gathering of data from both nurses and their patients, verbally and in writing, using two different spiritual health assessment tools. The first spiritual health assessment tool (Spiritual Health Assessment Tool 1) consisted of language that was non-spiritually-based. The second spiritual health assessment tool (Spiritual Health Assessment 2) consisted of spiritually-based language. A group of nurses and patients were provided the two different spiritual health assessment tools that each consisted of five items.
Nurses were provided a PowerPoint presentation with a patient case scenario about a patient diagnosed with melanoma. Within the patient case scenario, the patient diagnosed with melanoma verbalized fear of dying from cancer because his biological father had died as a result of melanoma metastatic disease. Participating patients were interviewed and provided information about the Joint Commission and the American Nurses Associations’ stance on the inclusion of spiritual health assessments when admitting patients to healthcare institutions.
Patients, unlike the nurses, were not shown a PowerPoint presentation, nor were they provided a case scenario. Patient interviews focused on education about spiritual health being a part of the healthcare admission process in healthcare facilities within the United States (a Joint Commission requirement for accredited facilities). The role of nurses in providing information about the availability of chaplain visitation or the contacting of patients’ clergy (i.e., a priest, a rabbi, or imam), as well as information on their religious, faith, or belief systems that could impact their delivery of health care (i.e., dietary choices, scheduled times of prayer and meditation, and recipient of blood products), was discussed. Thirty nurses and twelve patients volunteered to participate.
Literature Review
Spiritual care has traditionally been associated with nursing care of terminally ill (palliative care, hospice care) patients. However, spiritual care can be experienced by nurses in a variety of clinical settings (Giske and Cone 2015). Giske and Cone (2015) conducted a study from 2008 to 2014 using a grounded theory approach to provide eight focus groups for twenty-two nurses to explore the nurses’ perceptions of how patients’ spiritual needs can be met. The twenty-two nurses who participated in the study identified their primary concern as being to “assist the patient to alleviation.” According to Giske and Cone (2015), the nurses addressed their patients’ spiritual needs by “discerning the healing path,” which consisted of three stages: (1) tuning in on spirituality, (2) uncovering deep concerns, and (3) facilitating the healing process.
Vermandere et al. (2015) examined the ars moriendi texts, which are medieval in origin and provide instructions for a peaceful death experience. For example, the texts address five temptations that the dying must contend with as they transition from life to death. These five temptations included: an inability to cope with suffering and pain, the hanging on of temporal affairs, the loss of confidence in salvation, pride, and loss of faith. The ars moriendi texts were used to conduct a study using a parallel, convergent, mixed-methods approach in the evaluation of the Ars Moriendi Model (AMM) for Spiritual Assessment.
Quantitative and qualitative data were gathered by Vermandere et al. (2015) using a survey that was issued to nurses and physicians who were instructed to evaluate the AMM as a spiritual assessment tool and provide feedback as to whether it was a beneficial tool for patients receiving person-centered end-of-life care. Five physicians and nineteen nurses participated within the qualitative phase of the study, and four family physicians and seventeen nurses participated in the quantitative phase. Results were that the AMM Model was in fact conducive to use as a spiritual assessment tool and effective for end-of-life care (Vermandere et al. 2015).
Spanish- and English-speaking Hispanic/Latinos were interviewed in English or Spanish regarding the use of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-
191
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH, WELLNESS, AND SOCIETY
Being-Expanded (FACIT-SP-Ex) instrument, a 23-item measure of spiritual well-being. The number of Hispanics/Latinos participating within this study conducted by Brintz et al. (2017) was 5,163. The FACIT-SP-Ex instrument measured the spiritual well-being themes of faith, meaning, and peace. Findings indicated that this instrument demonstrated validity in the measurement of spiritual well-being for patients of Latino and Hispanic descent.
The comfort level of nurses in providing spiritual assessment to patients in their care was examined by Cone and Giske (Cone and Giske 2017). In a study conducted from 2014, 172 nurses were administered a 21-item survey. Participants indicated in open-ended questions that spirituality was a private matter. Nurses who had experience in discussing spiritual issues with patients shared that they felt comfortable addressing patients’ spiritual needs. Cone and Giske (2017) found that nurses who had prior preparation and experience with spiritual issues were better able to address the spiritual needs of their patients.
Nurses are more likely to witness issues of unforgiveness in their care of patients, particularly at the end of life. Ferrell et al. (2014), applying qualitative analysis, studied the narratives of 339 nurses from the United States, Belize, India, Romania, and the Philippines. Findings of Ferrell et al. (2014) were that nurses who are educated on the concept of forgiveness were better prepared to address their patients’ concerns with this issue before death occurred.
Methodology
Both quantitative and qualitative data, written and verbal, were used to evaluate the results of two separate groups of participants for this EBP project; patients and the nurses providing care to the patients on a Medical/Palliative Care Unit located in New England at the Gaylord Specialty Healthcare. Two spiritual health assessment tools were provided to the patients (n = 12) and nurses (n = 30). The first assessment tool was a 5-item questionnaire (Spiritual Health Assessment Tool 1) that did not use language suggestive of one having a faith or religious affiliation. The second assessment tool was also a 5-item questionnaire (Spiritual Health Assessment Tool 2) that used faith-based and traditionally spiritual language to describe one’s spiritual health. The two different instruments were used to determine preference of language for both nurses and patients when completing spiritual assessment tools. These spiritual assessment tools were developed by the author with consultation provided by Rabbi Jeffrey M. Silberman, DMin, DD, Director of Spiritual Care and Education at Bridgeport Hospital in Bridgeport, Connecticut. No funding was provided for this project.
Thirty nurses and twelve patients volunteered to participate in the review, feedback, and completion of the two spiritual health assessment tools upon the signing of a consent form. This EBP project was conducted over the course of three months; late May, June, July, and August of 2017. The nurses and patients self-identified as Baptist, Catholic, Sikh, Atheist, and Agnostic.
The thirty registered nurses who volunteered to participate in the EBP project were provided a brief training on the subject of spiritual health assessment. A PowerPoint discussing a case scenario of a patient diagnosed with melanoma (skin cancer) with a familial history of a parental (biological father) death from advanced stage melanoma was presented to the nursing staff. The patient in the case scenario was identified as experiencing spiritual distress concerns as he questioned the longevity of his life and prognosis. The nurses were then provided education on the American Nurses Association’s (ANA) and The Joint Commission’s (TJC) stance that spiritual assessments should be included in the care of patients. The nurses (n = 30) then were provided option one (Tool 1) and two (Tool 2) of the spiritual health assessments to complete.
Twelve patients who were inpatient on the Medical/Palliative Care Unit volunteered to participate in the EBP project. The patients were provided a verbal explanation for the purpose
192
GREEN: ASSESSING SPIRITUAL HEALTH THROUGH SPIRITUAL HEALTH ASSESSMENT TOOLS
of the project which included how the ANA and TJC support the use of spiritual assessment in the healthcare setting; which presents itself during the admission process as nursing staff inquire about patients’ religious and faith preferences. Patients were also informed that nurses may notify them (patients) of the availability of chaplaincy services during the process of their admission to a hospital unit. Patients (n = 12) were then provided option one and two of the spiritual health assessments to complete for the purposes of determining their preferred instrument.
Examples of statements included in the two options of the spiritual health assessments provided to the nurses and patients were:
Option one (Spiritual Health Assessment Tool 1, language is not suggestive of a faith or religion, nor belief in monotheistic God): “I believe that a higher power can help me cope with my illness and other life problems and I need to talk to someone about how I feel, that will not judge me or worry about what I say.”
Option two (Spiritual Health Assessment Tool 2, language is suggestive of a faith or religious belief and a belief in a monotheistic God): “I believe that my faith can help me cope with my illness and other life problems and I talk to God about how I feel, that way I will not feel judged or worry about what I say.”
Results
For each of the two 5-item spiritual health assessments, Likert-type measurements were used to obtain data that included the selections of never, sometimes, occasionally, always, and definitely. For spiritual assessment Tool 1 all p-values were greater than 0.05 (Tables 1, 2, 3, 4), and no significant differences were noted between the group of twelve patients or the thirty nurses. However, for spiritual health Tool 2, patients’ and nurses’ answers differed for statements 1 (p = 0.031) and 4 (p = 0.050).
Patients’ scores for statements 1 and 4 were higher than the nurses’ scores. The patients (n = 12) mean score for statement 1 was 3.83 with a standard deviation of 1.115 and the nurses’ (n = 30) mean score was 2.77 with a standard deviation of 1.455. Statement 1 was “I talk to God about how I feel, that way I will not feel judged or worry about what I say.” Patients’ mean score for statement 4 was 3.33 with a standard deviation of 1.497 and nurses’ mean score was 2.34 and 1.344. Statement 4 was “I wonder will I be forgiven of my sins.”
In review of the participants (patients and nurses) data for the total scores for spiritual health assessment Tool 1 and spiritual health assessment Tool 2, nurses’ scores were higher on Tool 1 (18.07) in comparison to Tool 2 (14.43). A significant difference was noted with a p value of p = 0.000. The patients’ total scores for Tool 1 were 18.56 and Tool 2 17.22 with minimal differences noted in the p value, which was p = 0.134. Six patients preferred Tool 1 and six preferred Tool 2 with an insignificant p value of p = 1.00. Twenty-one out of the thirty nurses participating in the EBP project preferred Tool 1, while seven nurses preferred Tool 2, with a significant p value of p = 0.0008.
Limitations of the Study
The clinical unit, a Medical/Palliative care unit, had patients that were on medical-related precautions and/or too fatigued secondary to illness to participate in the study. In respect of these patients’ additional needs for rest and healing, they were omitted from study participation. Hence, of the twenty-six patients who were eligible to participate, twelve were selected.
193
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH, WELLNESS, AND SOCIETY
Discussion
Of the twelve patients who participated in the study, six preferred Tool 1 (language not suggestive of a faith or religious affiliation) and six preferred Tool 2 (language used was associated with traditionally faith and religious beliefs). In review of the qualitative data obtained from patients that participated within this EBP project, patients who identified themselves as atheist and agnostic at the time of their admission to inpatient hospital care shared that they would have appreciated it if the nurse who completed the admission or another nurse (e.g., primary care nurse assigned to provide care) revisited them during their diagnostic and treatment phases of care. Interestingly, patients who identified themselves as agnostic or atheist reported that after receiving a poor prognosis or a change in their treatment regimen secondary to a worsening condition, they found themselves alone in their hospital room questioning the brevity of their own existence and the existence of a God or after-life. Changes in patients’ condition and prognoses led to their experiencing spiritual distress. The patients shared that they felt uncomfortable seeking additional spiritual support because they were unaware that they could seek spiritual support after having already identified themselves as not being persons associated with a religion, faith, or belief system.
Conclusion
The spiritual health assessment of patients completed by nurses is necessary for patients’ overall health care. The mental and physical health of patients is only a component of their identity. Nurses, by virtue of being a part of a caritas profession, know that as the physical body withers and the mind deteriorates, patients still require care of their emotional and spiritual health. Hence, the spiritual health assessment of patients in the care of nurses must be prioritized.
By providing standardized spiritual health assessment tools that can meet patients at their level of spiritual health need, be they believers in God at the time of their illnesses or atheist, nurses can ensure that patients’ spiritual health needs are addressed. Nurses, when identifying that patients are in spiritual distress through the completion of a spiritual health assessment tool, can facilitate appropriate referrals for chaplaincy support, counseling, and/or mental health services. Support for patients can also be met through the connection of communities of faith in patients’ own cultures of community (a shared set of values and beliefs, folklore).
Reliability statistics for spiritual health assessments Tool 1 and Tool 2 were used to measure the consistency of the five items in each spiritual health assessment tool. The total scores for reliability were calculated by statistician Richard Feinn, PhD, of the Quinnipiac Medical School in Hamden, Connecticut. Results were a Cronbach alpha score of 0.633 for Tool 1 and a Cronbach alpha score for Tool 2 of 0.083. These scores support the reliability of the use of Tool 1 and Tool 2 within inpatient clinical environments.
Indications for Nursing Practice
While there are multiple spiritual assessment tools available, there has not yet been a standardized spiritual health assessment tool proposed that can be used nationally or internationally in healthcare settings. Current spiritual health assessment tools tend to be lengthy (i.e., over ten to twenty items) and not conducive to the rapid assessments required in clinical settings to expedite the patient admission processes by nurses. The two spiritual health assessment tools used in this study consisted of five items an
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
