In Module Seven, you will submit your final project, which includes your newly created discussion? section. It should be a complete, polished artifact contai
Final Submission: Research Study Report
In Module Seven, you will submit your final project, which includes your newly created “discussion” section. It should be a complete, polished artifact containing all of the critical elements listed in the prompt above. It should reflect the incorporation of relevant instructor and peer feedback gained throughout the course. This submission will be graded with the Final Project Rubric.
Final Project Guidelines and Rubric.html
MAT 133 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
In today’s data-driven world, statistics can be found almost everywhere. Regardless of your major, you can use the lens of statistical thinking to better understand the world and put things into appropriate perspective. In particular, knowledge of statistics allows you to be a more critical consumer of information, including the credibility and significance of research studies.
The final project for this course is the creation of a research study report. After selecting an appropriate study from the Final Project Research Study Options document found in the Module One Reading and Resources, you will apply the critical-thinking skills gained from this course to summarize, analyze, and critique your study using a statistical lens. Specifically, you will determine to what extent your chosen study is well designed. The project is divided into two milestones and a final submission, which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to scaffold learning and ensure quality final submissions. As you review feedback from your instructor and peers, incorporate relevant feedback prior to the next milestone submission. Your final project submission should reflect the incorporation of all relevant feedback. These milestones will be submitted in Modules Two and Four. The final product will be submitted in Module Seven.
In this assignment, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following course competency:
- Identify and apply the aspects of a well-designed research study
Prompt
After selecting a research study from the provided list, create a report in which you evaluate the extent to which your chosen study reflects the aspects of a well-designed study. Specifically, you must address the critical elements listed below.
- Introduction
- Identify the specific focus of the research. In other words, what was this study about?
- Explain the purpose of the study. What was the study trying to achieve?
- Describe the specific characteristics of the group being studied. What was the population? What was the sample size? What were its demographics?
- Analysis
- Analyze the research methods of the study. In other words, how did the researchers test their hypotheses related to the research questions? What, if any, assumptions did the researchers make in order to conduct their research?
- Examine the outcomes of those tests. What were the major findings (i.e., did they reject or fail to reject the hypotheses and why)?
- Discussion
- Assess the implications of the study. For example, what surprised you or struck you as interesting? What wider relevance or meaning do you draw from this study?
- Identify the potential Next Steps for the research. What related questions remain unanswered? What was not accomplished in the study that needs to be followed up on?
Milestones
Milestone One: Introduction In Module Two, you will submit the “Introduction” section of the final project. This milestone will be graded with the Milestone One Rubric.
Milestone Two: Introduction and Analysis In Module Four, you will submit the “Analysis” section of the final project as well as the “Introduction” section, including the addition of relevant instructor and peer feedback. This milestone will be graded with the Milestone Two Rubric.
Final Submission: Research Study Report In Module Seven, you will submit your final project, which includes your newly created “discussion” section. It should be a complete, polished artifact containing all of the critical elements listed in the prompt above. It should reflect the incorporation of relevant instructor and peer feedback gained throughout the course. This submission will be graded with the Final Project Rubric.
What to Submit
Your research study report should be 3 to 4 pages in length (plus a cover page and references) and must be written in APA format. Use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Cite all references in APA format.
Final Project Rubric
| Criteria | Exemplary | Proficient | Needs Improvement | Not Evident | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduction: Focus | N/A | Accurately identifies the specific focus of the research (100%) | Identifies the focus of the research, but is not fully accurate or lacks specificity (55%) | Does not identify the focus of the research (0%) | 15 |
| Introduction: Purpose and Group | N/A | Accurately describes the specific purpose and characteristics of the group being studied (100%) | Describes the characteristics of the group being studied and describes the purpose, but is not fully accurate or lacks specificity (55%) | Does not describe the characteristics of the group being studied or the purpose (0%) | 15 |
| Analysis: Research Methods | Meets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates appreciation for the aspects of a well-designed research study (100%) | Analyzes the research methods of the study, including the hypothesis tests and any assumptions made (85%) | Analyzes the research methods of the study, but fails to fully or accurately address the hypothesis tests and any assumptions made (55%) | Does not analyze the research methods of the study (0%) | 15 |
| Analysis: Outcomes | Meets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates appreciation for the aspects of a well-designed research study (100%) | Examines the outcomes of the study, including the major findings and their statistical significance (85%) | Examines the outcomes, but fails to fully or accurately address the major findings and their statistical significance (55%) | Does not examine the outcomes of the research study (0%) | 15 |
| Discussion: Implications | Meets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates appreciation for the potential implications of research studies (100%) | Assesses the implications of the study in terms of its wider relevance or meaning (85%) | Discusses the implications of the study, but fails to fully or logically assess its wider relevance or meaning (55%) | Does not discuss the implications of the study (0%) | 15 |
| Discussion: Next Steps | Meets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates ability to develop a research question and identify various ways to address it (100%) | Identifies opportunities for future research based on findings from this study, and proposes methods for addressing those questions (85%) | Identifies opportunities for future research, but fails to connect recommendations to findings from this study or fails to propose appropriate methods for addressing new research questions (55%) | Does not identify opportunities for future research (0%) | 15 |
| Articulation of Response | Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format (100%) | Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization (85%) | Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas (55%) | Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas (0%) | 10 |
| Total: | 100% |
,
2
Partnership After Prison: Analyzing Couple Relationships During Reentry
Melony R. Hadden
Southern New Hampshire University
Instructor Scott Layden
CJ 120 CULTURAL AWARENESS
Introduction
Moving from prison to community brings substantial difficulties to individuals because of their intimate relationship considerations. Partnership After Prison: Couple Relationships During Reentry is a study by Megan Comfort and her colleagues in the Journal of Offender Rehabilitation about the relationship dynamics of prison reentry. This research project examines the strategies used by former inmates to handle relationships while giving attention to personal connections alongside budgetary commitments and social adjustments during their societal return. The study investigates how intimate relationships create stability or drive recidivism results among reentering individuals. The research examines personal relationships because this allows experts to study how social bonds impact returning to society. The study's research approaches are evaluated within this analysis by reviewing its hypothesis testing methodology, its foundational assumptions, and the importance of the data obtained.
Analysis
Researchers conducted their study with formerly incarcerated individuals and their romantic partners using semi-structured interviews. Research interviews evaluated how relationships formed and how couples handled finance management and provided emotional support when participants returned from incarceration. The research method followed grounded theory principles because it let participants develop their themes without restriction from predefined hypotheses. The authors of this research believed that romantic partnerships significantly impact offender readjustment processes since they affect how stable housing conditions are and how well individuals manage their emotions and obey the law. The researchers understood that their study could contain selection bias due to the self-selection of participants since those who spoke about their relationships might maintain more stable relationships than non-participants(Dwyer Emory,2022).
The analyst team at Comfort et al. planned data evaluation through thematic coding to detect regular patterns in participant experiences. The study examined factors affecting reentry success rates, such as trust, financial interdependence, and past conflicts. The reviewed research discovered that intimate partner support substantially decreased prisoners' rate of returning to prison while promoting their social readjustment. The relationships faced various obstacles, including suspicion among partners, financial pressure, and changes in influence between them. The research team discovered that some couples suffered marital tension because of their incorrect beliefs about adapting to life following imprisonment, which resulted in relationship conflicts and resulted in divorces sometimes.
The research results showed conflicting indicators about partnership endurance alongside prisoner success in reentry. Partners who supported their reentering loved ones found success, but some individuals faced obstacles because of changing dynamics and power between them and their partners. The research findings confirmed partial support for the hypothesis that intimate relationships heavily affect reentry experiences yet demonstrated differences in their influence level(Costa,2024). The researchers mentioned neither accepting nor rejecting their hypotheses because their qualitative methods focused on comprehending the lived realities rather than statistical proof. The analysis uncovered significant concepts that provide detailed comprehension of the influence that romantic relationships exercise on incarcerated persons after their release from prison.
Romantic relationships either promote or impede reintegration between partners based on their relationship support mechanisms and pre-reintegration relationship conditions. People who maintained strong communication connections and financially established plans between them were inclined toward stability. Still, those with unresolved relationship disagreements became more likely to face strain and higher risks of returning to crime. The research findings show that couples need intervention support throughout their re-enter process since relationship counseling with financial planning helps improve reintegration results.
The research by Comfort et al. provides essential information about how reentry processes interact with the intimate relationships of offenders. The research method used qualitative interviews and thematic analysis to collect comprehensive data about incarcerated individuals and their partners. The study indicates that although personal relationships provide stability, they bring specific obstacles that require solutions to achieve better reentry outcomes. Policies, together with community-based programs, must exist to help couples transition successfully from imprisonment to living in the broader society.
References
Costa, A. (2024). Relationships Beyond the Wall: The Experiences of Female Partners of Formerly Incarcerated Men During Reentry (Doctoral dissertation, The Wright Institute).
Dwyer Emory, A. (2022). To stay or go: Relationship dissolution and re-partnering after paternal incarceration. Family Relations, 71(3), 1191–1210.
Tadros, E., & Gregorash, A. M. (2022). Couple connectedness in corrections: Attachment, childhood parental stability, and dyadic adjustment in romantic relationships with an incarcerated partner. Crime & Delinquency, 00111287221134048.
,
Milestone One Submission: Introduction
The Impact of Reentry on Romantic Relationships: Challenges and Resilience of Couples After Incarceration
Melony R. Hadden
Southern New Hampshire
Instructor Scott Layden
MAT 133 Intro to Statistical Analysis
Introduction
Megan Comfort et al.'s research article "Partnership After Prison: Couple Relationships During Reentry," which appeared in the Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, studies the complex nature of interpersonal relationships during the risk period of being released from prison. Personnel who left prison and their partners manage three areas of difficulty: relational interactions, emotional transitions, and structural barriers during post-release adaptation. By examining trust building, communication methods, financial stability factors, and social reintegration processes, the study shows the whole picture of the effects of reentry on personal relations and general life satisfaction. Relationship knowledge enables better support of the obstacles formerly incarcerated people encounter alongside their relatives. This analysis gives researchers insight into criminal justice implications, extending throughout the prisoner population and family members.
This research analyses the complete experiences and significant hurdles couples face after one member of the couple completes incarceration. The research seeks to understand the effects of stigma, financial challenges, and power transformations on relationship health and satisfaction. The study exposes the psychological challenges married couples experience when they take on different roles that accompany their role changes. This analysis explores the social stereotypes that penalty reentrants face and the institutional barriers that affect their romantic relationships upon release. This investigative work enables policy decisions about better post-release transition support, which enhances care networks for reentering prisoners and their family members.
The research analyses former prisoners and their romantic partners in a specific population. This research examines couples consisting of a former prisoner who just started their social reintegration process. This analysis uses age-related factors, racial and socioeconomic standing, and relationship duration to understand fully how various elements shape relationship success.
Research participants represent a wide range of backgrounds, so their various experiences and viewpoints are included in the research findings. The wide range of participants enables researchers to detect distinct characteristics and obstacles that affect multiple groups, which then expands the usefulness of the study's findings.
The analysis focuses primarily on the dynamics of trust alongside communication abilities between couples throughout the reentry period. Lack of trust often develops between partners who have spent extended time apart, resulting in emotional detachment and communication problems. The research investigates how open exchange between couples together with emotional assistance enhances relationship endurance. The study reveals that both partners encounter issues when they need to bring up essential but sensitive matters, including how they conducted themselves in the past and what they desire from each other in the future. The researchers dissect such conversations to reveal essential partnership growth strategies following incarceration.
The research investigates financial stability because people with incarceration histories commonly struggle to obtain reliable employment. The analysis explains that financial instability produces relationship stress, leading to power dynamics between romantic partners. Married individuals encounter significant additional stress due to their limited work possibilities, insufficient money savings, and financial and legal responsibilities. Relationship management often becomes negatively affected when these obstacles create frustration and lead to conflicts and relationship breakdowns. Knowledge about economic influences during reentry provides the basis for developing policies that offer improved employment prospects for released prisoners.
This research evaluates the effects of social reintegration and support networks on the connection between partners. A person's reentry success rate benefits incredibly from support provided by family members, friends, and resources found within the community. Social influences that carry stigma after a criminal background produce significant obstacles to successful reentry. Social stigmas against some couples by their peers cause them to experience isolation while facing higher levels of stress. The study provides crucial information about how strong community support structures help imprisoned persons successfully reintegrate into society.
The study investigates the modifications that imprisonment creates to gender-based social duties and relationship-based power structures. The study observes the transformation of conventional gender norms after release from prison because individuals struggle to adopt their former roles. Financial pressure on men pushes them to reestablish their role as breadwinners, yet incarcerated women face challenges when they must let go of the power they gained in their absence. These modifications between spouses lead to conflicts needing major adjustments to settle down. The analysis provides detailed insights into the complex processes experienced by relationships after incarceration events, thus aiding deep comprehension.
This research delivers essential knowledge about the difficulties faced by pairs who try to adapt to the reentry experience. The study demonstrates that successful prisoner reintegration needs emotional backing, financial steadiness, and supportive community networks. Through its analysis, the study helps policymakers, social workers, and support organisations discover the elements that determine relationship outcomes. The data demonstrates why reentry programs must focus on single-person needs and partner dynamics. The comprehensive research functions as an essential tool that helps enhance the outcomes of incarcerated people along with their partners during post-incarceration periods.
Reference:
Comfort, M., McKay, T., Landwehr, J., Lindquist, C., & Bir, A. (2021). Partnership after prison: Couple relationships during reentry. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 60(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/xxxx
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
