Based on the IP you completed in Unit 4, you will now take the system that you selected for evaluation and create an implementation and support plan. You are
Individual Project Unit 5 #1 (3-4 pages)
Based on the IP you completed in Unit 4, you will now take the system that you selected for evaluation and create an implementation and support plan. You are to serve as the product manager for the given system. It is your responsibility to ensure the success of this system. Complete the following:
- Create an implementation plan (development and deployment) for the identified system.
- In addition to your implementation plan, be sure to consider the key performance indicators (KPIs) that you will use to evaluate the success or value of the system.
- Consider what maintenance aspects must be accounted for to ensure the long-term use of this system.
- Just as an FYI, the timelines for this kind of project are almost always in months and implementation/completion is usually 1-2 years after the first internal meeting.
Individual Project Unit 5 #2 (30-40 slides)
Create a PowerPoint presentation from your Individual Projects from Units 1–5. This PowerPoint presentation should be a presentation to a chief information officer (CIO). For your presentation, assume that you are being tasked with creating a new division within a healthcare information technology (IT) organization. You have been given complete control of this division; however, you need to explain to the CIO how you will manage the following:
- The systems development life cycle (SDLC) (e.g., waterfall or agile)
- The regulations associated with healthcare (e.g., Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act [HIPAA] and meaningful use)
- Security and recovery (e.g., system security, network security, and data security)
- System interoperability and organizational interoperability
- Implementation of the systems that your division is responsible for within the organization (e.g., action plan)
- Evaluation of your organization and definitions of success, including financial objectives
Note: Use APA style 7th edition to cite at least 2 scholarly sources from the last 5 years. All sources on the Reference Page are required to have a URL or DOI if you do not physically possess the journal or book.
UNIT 4 IP: HEALTH CARE IT PROJECTS 8
Unit 4 IP: Selecting Health Care IT Projects and Priorities
Maria Thomas
Colorado Technical University
HCM690
April 20, 2025
Unit 4 IP: Selecting Health Care IT Projects and Priorities
Using MACRA to Improve Healthcare Quality: Information Systems and Vendor Selection Criteria
The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) established fundamental healthcare system changes in 2015 that continue to shape the United States healthcare sector. MACRA drives essential healthcare changes through its incentives for provider quality improvements and effectiveness and technological implementation. This analysis examines one MACRA healthcare objective followed by a recommendation for an information system solution and selection or development guidance for the proposed system. The analysis incorporates important aspects from the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) as well as systems development life cycle (SDLC) methodology and fundamental security attributes.
MACRA and the Transition to Value-Based Care
The Quality Payment Program (QPP) under MACRA adopted both Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) and Advanced Alternative Payment Models (APMs) to replace the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) formula. The key healthcare objective of MACRA involves quality improvement through reimbursement adjustments that depend on provider performance measurements (Abodunde et al., 2021) The objective drives providers to enhance patient outcomes. It facilitates better service delivery, reduction of wasteful services, and effective care coordination.
The MACRA program seeks to elevate clinical practice standards through advanced data analysis and performance review systems, which is a key objective. Healthcare providers need to gather and send data regarding quality measurements, improvement activities, and interoperability metrics (such as electronic health record adoption) (Abodunde et al., 2021). Payment adjustments based on performance are determined through evaluation of these measures. Achieving this goal requires healthcare organizations to establish information systems that effectively capture, analyze, and report practice and patient data. The MACRA system provides clinicians with actionable data that shows both their patient health outcomes and their care quality measurements. Through this system, healthcare organizations gain the ability to maintain ongoing quality improvement while becoming more transparent and accountable throughout the care process.
Recommended Information System: Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS)
The Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) represents an appropriate information system for achieving MACRA’s goals of enhancing clinical practice and care outcomes. The integration of CDSS with EHRs allows providers to access evidence-based knowledge, real-time analytics, and receive clinical alerts, which help them make informed decisions (Sutton et al., 2020). CDSS tools afford health providers alerts about medication interactions, automatic test screenings, and evidence-based treatment recommendations.
CDSS improves reporting through its ability to collect information about both provider actions and patient results, which meets the reporting needs of MACRA. These systems enable configuration, allowing administrators to create reports that match specific MIPS categories, including quality measures, promoting interoperability, and improvement activities (Sutton et al., 2020). An effectively designed CDSS system achieves standardization of clinical practice and reduces care variations while boosting health outcomes, which aligns with MACRA's value-based structure. Through real-time feedback, CDSS tools help identify patients at high risk so healthcare personnel can intervene promptly to prevent readmissions and achieve long-term cost reductions. CDSS framework matches the main concepts of MACRA by combining quality measures with cost-effective practices.
Criteria for Vendor Selection or Internal Development
When selecting a vendor for a CDSS or deciding to develop the system internally, healthcare organizations must consider a comprehensive set of criteria that align with regulatory, operational, and clinical needs.
1. HIPAA Compliance
Compliance with HIPAA is non-negotiable when selecting or developing any health information system. A CDSS must ensure confidentiality, integrity, and availability of protected health information (PHI). Vendors must demonstrate the implementation of security measures such as data encryption, audit controls, and role-based access to minimize the risk of data breaches (Hak et al., 2022). In-house systems must also be developed following HIPAA Security Rule specifications, especially when transmitting PHI across multiple platforms or to third-party systems.
2. System Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Alignment
An organization must assess how a CDSS fits within its SDLC framework. Whether choosing a waterfall, agile, or hybrid methodology, alignment with existing SDLC processes is essential for efficient integration and lifecycle management. For in-house development, the organization must assess whether it has the technical expertise and infrastructure to handle all SDLC phases: planning, analysis, design, implementation, testing, deployment, and maintenance (Hak et al., 2022). A vendor should provide documentation and support throughout each SDLC stage, particularly during integration and validation phases.
3. Interoperability and Integration
Given MACRA’s emphasis on data sharing and performance reporting, a CDSS must seamlessly integrate with existing EHR systems and external health information exchanges. Vendors must adhere to interoperability standards such as HL7 FHIR and ensure compatibility with major EHR platforms like Epic, Cerner, or Allscripts. In-house development may be challenging unless the organization has robust API capabilities and knowledge of healthcare interoperability standards. Strong interoperability not only supports MACRA objectives but also enhances communication between primary care, specialty providers, and population health initiatives (Sutton et al., 2020) .
4. Data Analytics and Reporting Capabilities
The system needs to enable data analytics capabilities alongside predictive modeling features and customizable reporting functions. It should be able to create dashboards in real time and produce data reports that fulfill MACRA’s MIPS and APM reporting demands. Vendor solutions that include built-in compliance tools help providers lower their administrative responsibilities. Systems developed internally need adaptable analytical engines that adjust to CMS requirement changes (Hak et al., 2022). Furthermore, advanced analytics systems help healthcare organizations detect care disparities so they can develop specific improvement plans that support health equity as a critical quality care metric.
5. User Interface and Clinical Workflow Integration
The adoption rate of CDSS depends heavily on how users find the system easy to use and how smoothly it fits into clinical operations. The system needs to offer an intuitive interface that generates actionable warnings that do not lead to alert fatigue and improves workflow efficiency for providers (Hak et al., 2022). Vendors should provide adjustable interfaces, mobile accessibility, and systems that operate with minimal downtime. The delivery of equivalent user experience by an internal solution requires significant user-centered design work coupled with clinical validation.
6. Scalability and Support
A CDSS evaluation must determine whether it can operate efficiently in multiple departments and facility settings. A CDSS requires vendor solutions that offer scalable cloud infrastructure, 24/7 technical support, and training resources. Running a CDSS solution within the organization demands sustained investments in IT personnel, security maintenance, alongside ongoing system optimization (Hak et al., 2022).
7. Cost and Return on Investment (ROI)
The expense of implementing these systems includes both upfront costs for acquisition and maintenance charges and expenses for training the staff. The pricing system should be transparent and vendors must show the financial benefits through improved performance scores and MACRA-based reimbursement. The assessment of internal development requires analysis of its cost effectiveness, deployment duration, and potential unforeseen expenses, including downtime and regulatory noncompliance costs (Sutton et al., 2020). Organizations need to evaluate both direct and indirect ROI factors, the latter includes patient satisfaction, reduced malpractice risk, and lower staff turnover stemming from enhanced workflow and improved decision-making capabilities.
8. Security Attributes
CDSS security implementation requires a framework that supports confidentiality, integrity, and availability as mandatory attributes. The security framework for a CDSS requires confidentiality to limit access to PHI, integrity to protect data accuracy and consistency, and availability to ensure access to needed information (Sutton et al., 2020). Security measures should also include intrusion detection systems along with multi-factor authentication and regular vulnerability assessments. Security risk analyses of vendor and internally developed systems need to follow HIPAA and NIST cybersecurity guidelines.
Conclusion
MACRA's implementation has transformed healthcare delivery by shifting its focus from volume-based services to value-based care. Performance reporting and data-driven decision-making represent essential healthcare objectives for improving clinical practice and patient outcomes under MACRA. A Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) functions as a vital tool that connects to EHRs to help providers meet MACRA quality reporting needs. The implementation of a CDSS by healthcare organizations should be based on criteria that include HIPAA compliance, SDLC alignment, interoperability, analytics capabilities, user experience, scalability, and security. A properly designed CDSS helps organizations meet MACRA goals and sets them up for lasting success in value-based care delivery.
References
Abodunde, B., Slater, C., & Coustasse, A. (2021). MACRA and accountable care organizations: Is it working? The Journal of Ambulatory Care Management, 44(2), 148–154. https://doi.org/10.1097/JAC.0000000000000350
Hak, F., Guimarães, T., & Santos, M. (2022). Towards effective clinical decision support systems: A systematic review. PloS One, 17(8), e0272846. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272846
Sutton, R. T., Pincock, D., Baumgart, D. C., Sadowski, D. C., Fedorak, R. N., & Kroeker, K. I. (2020). An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success. Npj Digital Medicine, 3(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-0221-y
,
SECURITY AND RECOVERY 7
Unit 3 IP: Security and Recovery
Maria Thomas
Colorado Technical University
HCM690
April 13, 2025
Unit 3 IP: Security and Recovery
Comprehensive Healthcare Data Security Plan for a Major Healthcare Organization
Healthcare organizations need to protect patient data as a primary objective to satisfy Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) requirements and combat cybersecurity threats in their digital healthcare systems. Organizations must develop an extensive security plan for patient data because electronic health records (EHRs), connected medical devices, and third-party services usage continues to grow. The security plan must include technical safeguards, physical security measures, vendor assessment procedures, and detailed protocols for recovering from security breaches. Healthcare organizations achieve compliance management alongside improved security and patient trust through the integration of these elements within their agile systems development life cycle (SDLC).
Securing Systems and Data: A Multi-Layered Approach
Data security plans must develop several security frameworks that integrate administrative controls with physical measures and technical protections (Singh et al., 2021). The security framework upholds HIPAA security requirements by implementing complete risk assessment and management methods to safeguard ePHI.
Technical Safeguards
Security of healthcare systems demands organizations to deploy firewalls, intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS), data encryption (for both rest and transit periods), and role-based access controls (RBAC) protocols. All users needing access to clinical systems must follow multifactor authentication (MFA) as a fundamental security protocol. Additionally
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
