There is often a requirement to evaluate descriptive statistics for data within an organization or for health care information. Every year, the National Canc
There is often a requirement to evaluate descriptive statistics for data within an organization or for health care information. Every year, the National Cancer Institute collects and publishes data based on patient demographics. Understanding differences between the groups based upon the collected data often informs health care professionals about research, treatment options, or patient education.
Using the data on the "National Cancer Institute Data" Excel spreadsheet (attached), calculate the descriptive statistics indicated below for each of the race/ethnicity groups. Refer to your textbook and the topic Resources, as needed, for assistance with creating Excel formulas.
Provide the following descriptive statistics:
- Measures of central tendency: mean, median, and mode.
- Measures of variation: variance, standard deviation, and range (a formula is not needed for range).
- Once the data are calculated, provide a 150-250-word analysis of the descriptive statistics on the spreadsheet. This should include differences and health outcomes between groups.
APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
This assignment uses a rubric (attached). Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Sheet1
American Indian / Alaska Native (includes Hispanic) | Asian / Pacific Islander (includes Hispanic) | Black (includes Hispanic) | Hispanic (any race) | White (includes Hispanic) | National Cancer Institute (2018) Lung and bronchus cancer. Retrieved from January 8, 2019 from https://seer.cancer.gov/explorer/application.php?site=47&data_type=1&graph_type=2&compareBy=race&chk_sex_1=1&chk_race_5=5&chk_race_4=4&chk_race_3=3&chk_race_6=6&chk_race_2=2&chk_age_range_1=1&chk_data_type_1=1&advopt_precision=1&advopt_display=1&showDataFor=sex_1_and_age_range_1_and_data_type_1 | |||
Year of Diagnosis | Rate per 100,000 | Rate per 100,000 | Rate per 100,000 | Rate per 100,000 | Rate per 100,000 | |||
2000 | 45.7 | 41.8 | 77.8 | 34.2 | 68.8 | |||
2001 | 47.9 | 41 | 79 | 34.1 | 68.7 | |||
2002 | 44.6 | 40.4 | 75.8 | 34.1 | 68 | |||
2003 | 50 | 40.9 | 77.3 | 34.5 | 67.1 | |||
2004 | 51.7 | 40.5 | 75.1 | 35 | 65.8 | |||
2005 | 48.7 | 40.2 | 73.7 | 33.8 | 65.9 | |||
2006 | 46.4 | 39.8 | 73.4 | 32 | 65.8 | |||
2007 | 43.1 | 38.8 | 71.2 | 32.7 | 65.2 | |||
2008 | 45 | 38.5 | 70.8 | 32.2 | 63.9 | |||
2009 | 40.1 | 39 | 71.6 | 31.8 | 63.1 | |||
2010 | 42.4 | 37 | 67.8 | 30.3 | 60.4 | |||
2011 | 39.6 | 36.6 | 64.1 | 29.4 | 58.5 | |||
2012 | 36.6 | 36.7 | 64.3 | 28.2 | 57.5 | |||
2013 | 39.9 | 36.6 | 60.5 | 28.8 | 56.3 | |||
2014 | 32 | 34 | 61.3 | 26.8 | 55.4 | |||
2015 | 38.7 | 34.4 | 57.4 | 26 | 53.2 |
,
Summary and Descriptive Statistics – Rubric
Measures of Central Tendency 35 points
Criteria Description
Mean, Median and Mode
5. Target 35 points
Measures of central tendency, including the mean, median, and mode, are
calculated correctly.
4. Acceptable 29.75 points
N/A
3. Approaching 26.25 points
Measures of central tendency, including the mean, median, and mode, are mostly
calculated, but one required calculation is missing.
2. Insufficient 22.75 points
Measures of central tendency, including the mean, median, and mode, are partially
calculated, but two required calculations are missing.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Measures of central tendency are not calculated.
Collapse All
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Measures of Variation 35 points
Criteria Description
Variance, Standard Deviation, and Range
5. Target 35 points
Measures of central variation, including variance, standard deviation, and range,
are calculated correctly for variance and standard deviation. Range is identified.
4. Acceptable 29.75 points
N/A
3. Approaching 26.25 points
Measures of central variation, including variance, standard deviation, and range,
are mostly calculated, but one required calculation is missing.
2. Insufficient 22.75 points
Measures of central variation, including variance, standard deviation, and range,
are partially calculated.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Measures of variation are not calculated.
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Analysis of Descriptive Statistics 35 points
Criteria Description
5. Target 35 points
Analysis of the descriptive statistics for differences and health outcome
recommendations between the groups is thorough, accurate, and includes
substantial explanation and supporting details.
4. Acceptable 29.75 points
Analysis of the descriptive statistics for differences and health outcome
recommendations between the groups is complete and mostly accurate and
contains explanation.
3. Approaching 26.25 points
Analysis of the descriptive statistics for differences and health outcome
recommendations between the groups is included but lacks accuracy, explanation,
or relevant supporting details.
2. Insufficient 22.75 points
Analysis of the descriptive statistics for differences and health outcome
recommendations between the groups is incomplete or incorrect.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Analysis of the descriptive statistics for differences and health outcome
recommendations between the groups is not included.
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Excel Formulas 28 points
Criteria Description
5. Target 28 points
Excel formulas are complete and correct for all problems.
4. Acceptable 23.8 points
Excel formulas are included for all problems and contain only minor errors.
3. Approaching 21 points
Excel formulas are mostly included and contain minor errors.
2. Insufficient 18.2 points
Excel formulas are partially included or contain significant errors that affect
problem solutions.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Excel formulas are incomplete or incorrect.
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Mechanics of Writing 7 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence
structure, etc.?
5. Target 7 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence
structure are used throughout.?
4. Acceptable 5.95 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence
structure are used.
3. Approaching 5.25 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally
appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.?
2. Insufficient 4.55 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language
choice or sentence structure are recurrent.??
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language
choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.??
Total 140 points
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
