By exploring practical instances where businesses and teams have effectively utilized panel discussions, individuals will better understand how collabora

Overview

By exploring practical instances where businesses and teams have effectively utilized panel discussions, individuals will better understand how collaboration between different departments can be strengthened.

Instructions

For each of the following statements, respond in 1—2 paragraphs:

1. Identify delegation techniques that are well-known.
2. Describe what can be learned or gained from delegation and team empowerment approaches.
3. Discuss how delegation can be used to encourage team members' collaboration and cross-functional interactions.
4. Describe examples of businesses or teams that have used panels to improve interdepartmental cooperation.
5. Include relevant sources that give actual evidence, case studies, expert opinions, or theoretical frameworks to support each of your points.

This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The library is your home for SWS assistance, including citations and formatting. Please refer to the Library site for all support. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

View RubricWeek 7 Activity – Collaboration and Cross Functional InteractionWeek 7 Activity – Collaboration and Cross Functional InteractionCriteriaRatingsPtsIdentify delegation techniques that are well-known.7.5 to >6.74 ptsExemplaryIdentified delegation techniques that are well-known.6.74 to >5.99 ptsCompetentIdentified delegation techniques, but the delegation techniques success are unclear.5.99 to >5.24 ptsNeeds ImprovementIdentified delegation techniques, but the delegation techniques are not well known.5.24 to >0 ptsUnacceptableDid not identify delegation techniques that are well-known./ 7.5 ptsDescribe what can be learned or gained from delegation and team empowerment approaches.10 to >8.99 ptsExemplaryDescribed what can be learned or gained from delegation and team empowerment approaches.8.99 to >7.99 ptsCompetentDescribed what can be learned or gained from delegation and team empowerment approaches, but the description is incomplete.7.99 to >6.99 ptsNeeds ImprovementDescribed what can be learned or gained from delegation and team empowerment approaches, but the description is incorrect.6.99 to >0 ptsUnacceptableDid not describe what can be learned or gained from delegation and team empowerment approaches./ 10 ptsDiscuss how delegation can be used to encourage team members' collaboration and cross-functional interactions.10 to >8.99 ptsExemplaryDiscussed how delegation can be used to encourage team members' collaboration and cross-functional interactions.8.99 to >7.99 ptsCompetentDiscussed how delegation can be used to encourage team members’ collaboration and cross-functional interactions, but the discussion is incomplete.7.99 to >6.99 ptsNeeds ImprovementDiscussed how delegation can be used to encourage team members' collaboration and cross-functional interactions, but the discussion is incorrect.6.99 to >0 ptsUnacceptableDid not discuss how delegation can be used to encourage team members' collaboration and cross-functional interactions./ 10 ptsDescribe examples of businesses or teams that have used panels to improve interdepartmental cooperation.10 to >8.99 ptsExemplaryDescribed examples of businesses or teams that have used panels to improve interdepartmental cooperation.8.99 to >7.99 ptsCompetentDescribed examples of businesses or teams that have used panels to improve interdepartmental cooperation, but the description is incomplete.7.99 to >6.99 ptsNeeds ImprovementDescribed examples of businesses or teams that have used panels to improve interdepartmental cooperation, but the description lacks clarity.6.99 to >0 ptsUnacceptableDid not describe examples of businesses or teams that have used panels to improve interdepartmental cooperation./ 10 ptsInclude relevant sources that give actual evidence, case studies, expert opinions, or theoretical frameworks to support each of your points.7.5 to >6.74 ptsExemplaryIdentified relevant sources that give actual evidence, case studies, expert opinions, or theoretical frameworks to support each of your points.6.74 to >5.99 ptsCompetentIdentified relevant sources that give actual evidence, case studies, expert opinions, or theoretical frameworks to support each of your points, but not all of the sources support your point.5.99 to >5.24 ptsNeeds ImprovementIdentified relevant sources that give actual evidence, case studies, expert opinions, or theoretical frameworks to support each of your points, but the sources do not support your points.5.24 to >0 ptsUnacceptableDid not identify relevant sources that give actual evidence, case studies, expert opinions, or theoretical frameworks to support each of your points./ 7.5 ptsWriting is clear, includes appropriate writing mechanics, and follows SWS formatting requirements.5 to >4.49 ptsExemplaryWriting has very few spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors; few fragments, comma splices, and run-ons. 0–2 errors present.4.49 to >3.99 ptsCompetentWriting has spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors that are distracting in a few places; few fragments, comma splices, and run-ons. 3–4 errors present.3.99 to >3.49 ptsNeeds ImprovementWriting has spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors that are distracting in some places. 5–6 errors present.3.49 to >0 ptsUnacceptableWriting has spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors, fragments, comma splices and run-ons that distract from the message. More than 6 errors present./ 5 ptsTotal Points: 0