Pretend you are a human services professional working with a client named Alex, who is experiencing significant personal and financial difficulties. Alex h
Pretend you are a human services professional working with a client named Alex, who is experiencing significant personal and financial difficulties. Alex has shared sensitive information about their struggles, and you are responsible for providing support and resources.
For this assignment, using the previously mentioned scenario:
· Define mandatory ethics.
· Describe one mandatory ethical standard you must follow while working with Alex.
· Briefly describe one key ethical principle that applies to your work with Alex.
· Describe one virtue that is important in your interaction with Alex.
· Compare the four types of ethics in relation to your work with Alex.
· Highlight their similarities and differences and how they guide your actions and decisions.
· Identify one aspirational ethical goal you might strive for in your work with Alex.
· Compares and contrasts mandatory, aspirational, principle, and virtue, along with an explanation of how they will guide decision-making.
See attachment for further instructions.
Ethical Decision-Making
[WLOs: 1, 2, 3] [CLOs: 1, 3, 4]
Prior to working on this journal, review the following resources:
· ACA Ethical Standards Casebook Links to an external site.
· Chapter 3: The Four Values Framework: Fairness, Respect, Care and HonestyLinks to an external site.
· Beyond Ethical Decision MakingLinks to an external site.
· Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct Links to an external site.
· Ethical Standards for Human Services Professionals Links to an external site.
· Ethics and Values in the Human Services Links to an external site.
Using the readings and content from this week, pretend you are a human services professional working with a client named Alex, who is experiencing significant personal and financial difficulties. Alex has shared sensitive information about their struggles, and you are responsible for providing support and resources.
For this assignment, using the previously mentioned scenario:
· Define mandatory ethics.
· Describe one mandatory ethical standard you must follow while working with Alex.
· Briefly describe one key ethical principle that applies to your work with Alex.
· Describe one virtue that is important in your interaction with Alex.
· Compare the four types of ethics in relation to your work with Alex.
· Highlight their similarities and differences and how they guide your actions and decisions.
· Identify one aspirational ethical goal you might strive for in your work with Alex.
· Compares and contrasts mandatory, aspirational, principle, and virtue, along with an explanation of how they will guide decision-making.
You are encouraged to reference any applicable subject in the National Organization for Human Services (NOHS) code of ethics.
The Ethical Decision-Making paper
· must be 2 to 3 double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA Style Links to an external site. as outlined in the Writing Center’s APA Formatting for Microsoft Word Links to an external site. resource.
· must include a separate title page with the following in title case:
· title of paper in bold font
· Space should appear between the title and the rest of the information on the title page.
· student’s name
· name of institution (The University of Arizona Global Campus)
· course name and number
· instructor’s name
· due date
· must utilize academic voice.
· Review the Academic Voice Links to an external site. resource for additional guidance.
· must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph.
· Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.
· For assistance in writing Introductions & Conclusions Links to an external site. and Writing a Thesis Statement Links to an external site. , refer to the Writing Center resources.
· must use at least two credible sources in addition to the course text.
· The Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources Links to an external site. table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source.
· To assist you in completing the research required for this assignment, refer to this Quick and Easy Library Research Links to an external site. tutorial, which introduces the University of Arizona Global Campus Library and the research process, and provides some library search tips.
· must document any information used from sources in APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center’s APA: Citing Within Your Paper Links to an external site. guide.
· must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center.
· Refer to the APA: Formatting Your References List Links to an external site. resource in the Writing Center for specifications.
· must refer to Sample Reflective Writing Links to an external site. resource.
Carefully review the Grading RubricLinks to an external site. for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your journal.
ORG6520.W1J1.09.03.24
Description:
Total Possible Score: 5.00
Defines Mandatory Ethics
Total: 1.00
Distinguished – Thoroughly, clearly, and accurately defines mandatory ethics.
Proficient – Defines mandatory ethics. Minor details are missing, inaccurate, or unclear.
Basic – Minimally defines mandatory ethics. Relevant details are missing, inaccurate, and/or unclear.
Below Expectations – Attempts to define mandatory ethics; however, significant details are missing, inaccurate, or unclear.
Non-Performance – The definition of mandatory ethics is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Describes One Mandatory Ethical Standard One Must Follow While Working with Alex
Total: 1.00
Distinguished – Thoroughly describes one mandatory ethical standard one must follow while working with Alex.
Proficient – Describes one mandatory ethical standard one must follow while working with Alex. Minor details are missing.
Basic – Minimally describes one mandatory ethical standard one must follow while working with Alex. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts to describe one mandatory ethical standard one must follow while working with Alex; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance – The description of one mandatory ethical standard one must follow while working with Alex is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Describes One Key Ethical Principle That Applies to One’s Work with Alex
Total: 0.25
Distinguished – Thoroughly describes one key ethical principle that applies to one’s work with Alex.
Proficient – Describes one key ethical principle that applies to one’s work with Alex. Minor details are missing.
Basic – Minimally describes one key ethical principle that applies to one’s work with Alex. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts to describe one key ethical principle that applies to one’s work with Alex; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance – The description of one key ethical principle that applies to one’s work with Alex is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Describes One Virtue That is Important in One’s Interaction with Alex
Total: 0.25
Distinguished – Thoroughly describes one virtue that is important in one’s interaction with Alex.
Proficient – Describes one virtue that is important in one’s interaction with Alex. Minor details are missing.
Basic – Minimally describes one virtue that is important in one’s interaction with Alex. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts to describe one virtue that is important in one’s interaction with Alex; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance – The description of one virtue that is important in one’s interaction with Alex is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Compares the Four Types of Ethics in Relation to One’s Work with Alex
Total: 0.25
Distinguished – Thoroughly compares the four types of ethics in relation to one’s work with Alex.
Proficient – Compares the four types of ethics in relation to one’s work with Alex. Minor details are missing, or the comparison is unbalanced.
Basic – Minimally compares the four types of ethics in relation to one’s work with Alex. Relevant details are missing, and/or the comparison is unbalanced.
Below Expectations – Attempts to compare the four types of ethics in relation to one’s work with Alex; however, significant details are missing, and the comparison is significantly unbalanced.
Non-Performance – The comparison of the four types of ethics in relation to one’s work with Alex is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Highlights the Similarities and Differences and How They Guide One’s Actions and Decisions
Total: 0.25
Distinguished – Clearly and accurately highlights similarities and differences and how they guide one’s actions and decisions.
Proficient – Highlights similarities and differences and how they guide one’s actions and decisions. Minor details are slightly unclear or inaccurate.
Basic – Vaguely highlights similarities and differences and how they guide one’s actions and decisions. Relevant details are unclear and/or inaccurate.
Below Expectations – Attempts to highlight similarities and differences and how they guide one’s actions and decisions; however, significant details are unclear and inaccurate.
Non-Performance – The highlighting of similarities and differences and how they guide one’s actions and decisions is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Identifies One Aspirational Ethical Goal One Might Strive for in One’s Work with Alex
Total: 0.50
Distinguished – Clearly and accurately identifies one aspirational ethical goal one might strive for in one’s work with Alex.
Proficient – Identifies one aspirational ethical goal one might strive for in one’s work with Alex. Minor details are slightly unclear or inaccurate.
Basic – Vaguely identifies one aspirational ethical goal one might strive for in one’s work with Alex. Relevant details are unclear and/or inaccurate.
Below Expectations – Attempts to identify one aspirational ethical goal one might strive for in one’s work with Alex; however, significant details are unclear and inaccurate.
Non-Performance – The identification of one aspirational ethical goal one might strive for in one’s work with Alex is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Compares and Contrasts Mandatory, Aspirational, Principle, and Virtue, Along with an Explanation of How They Will Guide Decision-making
Total: 0.50
Distinguished – Thoroughly compares and contrasts mandatory, aspirational, principle, and virtue, along with an explanation of how they will guide decision-making.
Proficient – Compares and contrasts mandatory, aspirational, principle, and virtue, along with an explanation of how they will guide decision-making. Minor details are missing, or the comparison and contrast is unbalanced.
Basic – Minimally compares and contrasts mandatory, aspirational, principle, and virtue, along with an explanation of how they will guide decision-making. Relevant details are missing, and/or the comparison and contrast is unbalanced.
Below Expectations – Attempts to compare and contrast mandatory, aspirational, principle, and virtue, along with an explanation of how they will guide decision-making; however, significant details are missing, and the comparison and contrast is significantly unbalanced.
Non-Performance – The comparison and contrast of mandatory, aspirational, principle, and virtue, along with an explanation of how they will guide decision-making is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Total: 0.25
Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.
Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.
Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.
Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: APA Formatting
Total: 0.25
Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.
Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.
Basic – Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements.
Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Resource Requirement
Total: 0.25
Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Proficient - Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Basic - Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.
Below Expectations - Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Page Requirement
Total: 0.25
Distinguished - The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Proficient - The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Basic - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Below Expectations - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
