Personality Analysis: Each student will undertake the TriMetrix/ Indigo assessment following the link posted on Brightspace under contents and review their
Personality Analysis:
Each student will undertake the TriMetrix/ Indigo assessment following the link posted on Brightspace under contents and review their TriMetrix/ Indigo assessment results, focusing on DISC style, strengths, weaknesses, and driving forces.
Reflect on how your personality traits align with your career aspirations and current job roles. Relate this to past personal or work/ school related experiences, challenges, and successes, emphasizing the role of tacit knowledge (like intuitive decision-making or personal insights developed through experience, concepts and theories learned in this course).
Based on your personality analysis, identify two to three key strengths and weaknesses relevant to your career path, using specific examples that reflect your tacit knowledge in action. Outline steps to leverage your strengths and address your weaknesses. Include practical strategies for skill development, networking, and professional growth.
Identify strategies to maximize your strengths and mitigate potential challenges in your chosen career path. Include practical techniques for communication, problem-solving, and conflict resolution that leverage your tacit (experiential) knowledge. follow apa 7 standard with rubrics of ucw canada
Trimetrix/Indigo Assessment and Career Roadmap (25%)
Individual Assignment
Please read the guidelines thoroughly else it will cost you grades.
Due:
Week 4 – Part 1 submission (before the end of Feb 6, 2025 OGL class hours)
Week 8 – Part 2 submission (before the end of Mar 6, 2025 OGL class hours)
Objective:
The objective of this assignment is to enable MBA students to harness the insights from their personality tests to bolster their career prospects and personal development. By integrating self-awareness with actionable strategies, students will identify steps to utilize their innate strengths, address personal growth areas, and navigate professional challenges effectively, drawing significantly on their tacit knowledge.
Tacit knowledge refers to the internalized knowledge that an individual may not necessarily be consciously aware of such as personal experiences, insights, intuition, and skills acquired through hands-on or real-world experiences. This assignment encourages the application of such implicit understandings in strategic personal and career development.
Timeline for Submission and Feedback:
Part 1 Submission (10%): Submit personality analysis. Receive feedback from the instructor on the clarity, relevance, and specificity of the plan so that you can apply the learnings in your part 2 plan. The focus of this part is personality analysis.
Part 2 Submission (15%): Submit a personalized action plan (a 5-year career roadmap with important milestones, including labour-market analysis of your chosen career) and ensure its alignment to personality analysis with career aspirations and professional context. The focus of this part is career development plan.
Note: Please consider both parts as separate assignments.
Instructions:
Part 1
Personality Analysis:
Each student will undertake the TriMetrix/ Indigo assessment following the link posted on Brightspace under contents and review their TriMetrix/ Indigo assessment results, focusing on DISC style, strengths, weaknesses, and driving forces.
Reflect on how your personality traits align with your career aspirations and current job roles. Relate this to past personal or work/ school related experiences, challenges, and successes, emphasizing the role of tacit knowledge (like intuitive decision-making or personal insights developed through experience, concepts and theories learned in this course).
Based on your personality analysis, identify two to three key strengths and weaknesses relevant to your career path, using specific examples that reflect your tacit knowledge in action. Outline steps to leverage your strengths and address your weaknesses. Include practical strategies for skill development, networking, and professional growth.
Identify strategies to maximize your strengths and mitigate potential challenges in your chosen career path. Include practical techniques for communication, problem-solving, and conflict resolution that leverage your tacit (experiential) knowledge.
Part 2
Submit your personalized action plan summarizing your journey, insights gained, lessons learned from part 1, and strategies to implement your action plan.
Apply the SMART goal-setting model (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) to structure your action plan, ensuring clarity and accountability.
Personalized Action Plan and Application to Career Context:
Analyze how your personality traits may influence your career trajectory and work performance, focusing on the impact of tacit knowledge in different professional settings, such as team dynamics, leadership roles, and client interactions.
Build on Part 1 by adding a labor market analysis component that is tailored to each student's desired career path.
Labor Market Analysis: Students will identity current job openings in their desired career/ industry, specify the province. Students will then perform a labor market analysis (e.g., using the National Occupational Classification (NOC), Canadian Occupational Projection System (COPS), Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC), or other relevant databases) to understand the projected demand in their desired field. Students must identify the required skills, qualifications, and competencies that align with their personality and action plan.
Career Road Map: Students will create a practical career roadmap with a timeline of 5 years where they will set key career milestones with specific, actionable steps. This might include skill development, training or certification needs, networking goals with realistic timelines based on market trends. Students must integrate insights from Part 1 into this timeline to show a clear path from self-awareness to concrete, strategic career steps.
APA writing conventions should be followed in the report (1500 – 1800 words for Part 1 and 1800 and 2500 for Part 2), and additionally a title page, abstract page, reference page, in-text citations (if you are presenting another author’s ideas in your own language you still must provide the in-text citation of that author), report format and references in APA format.
All submissions will be made on Brightspace. Please note that assignment submissions are ONLY accepted on Brightspace and NOT on email. Kindly rename your assignment file by your respective name before you upload. For example, if John Smith is submitting his assignment his assignment file name should be “Johnsmith”.
The Trimetrix/ Indigo Assessment and Career Roadmap will be graded from 25% as mentioned below.
Part 1 Submission (10%) – (per rubric attached at Appendix- A) – Due in Week 4 (before the end of OGL class hours)
Part 2 Submission (15%) – (per rubric attached at Appendix- B) – Due in Week 8 (before the end of OGL class hours)
Both submissions will be uploaded on the following:
1. Assignments on Brightspace (PDF/ MS Word Format as accepted by Brightspace)
Assessment Criteria:
Clarity and depth of personality analysis, particularly highlighting tacit knowledge.
Relevance and specificity of the action plan to individual strengths and weaknesses.
Alignment of final plan (including labour-market analysis and career roadmap) with career aspirations and professional context.
Reflection on implementation experience and application of feedback.
Appendix – A
Assessment Rubric for Trimetrix/ Indigo Assessment and Career Roadmap Part 1 ( Grades = 10%)
1-4 Scale |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
||||
Percentage Score |
Weight |
0-59 |
60-67 |
68-71 |
72-75 |
76-79 |
80-84 |
85-89 |
90-100 |
Grades |
F |
C |
B- |
B |
B+ |
A- |
A |
A+ |
|
Mastery Level |
Beginning |
Developing |
Competent |
Mastery |
|||||
Standard Level |
Below Standard |
Approaching Standard |
At Standard |
Exceeds Standard |
|||||
Personality Analysis Clarity and depth of personality analysis |
30 |
Limited to superficial description understanding of personality traits without reflection on personal or work/ school related examples with no connection to course concepts/ theories. |
Demonstrates a basic understanding of personality traits with limited personal or work/school-related examples with limited connection to course concepts/ theories. |
Demonstrates understanding of personality traits with relevant personal or work/school-related examples with some connection to course concepts/ theories. |
Provides a comprehensive analysis of personality traits with excellent personal or work/school-related examples and connects their analysis with course concepts/ theories. |
||||
Strengths and Weaknesses Leveraging strengths and addressing weaknesses |
20 |
Unable to identify meaningful strengths and weaknesses or does so inadequately. Strategies are unclear, impractical, or disconnected from career goals, no use of course theories and frameworks. |
Identifies strengths and weaknesses but provides vague or generic examples. Strategies for leveraging strengths or addressing weaknesses lack detail or specificity, limited use of course theories and frameworks. |
Identifies 2-3 strengths and weaknesses with relevant examples. Suggests practical steps to leverage strengths and address weaknesses, including basic strategies for growth utilizing course concepts not the theories and frameworks. |
Identifies more than 3 key strengths and weaknesses with specific, relevant examples. Provides innovative, actionable steps to leverage strengths and address weaknesses. Strategies incorporate practical skill development, networking, and professional growth techniques utilizing course theories and frameworks. |
||||
Tacit Knowledge Bridging Tacit Knowledge with Career Aspirations |
25 |
Unable to integrate tacit knowledge effectively. Connections to strategies and career aspirations are unclear, superficial, or absent, no use of course theories and frameworks. |
Makes basic references to tacit knowledge but lacks depth or clear connection to strategies and career aspirations. Examples are minimal or generic, limited use of course theories and frameworks. |
Effectively incorporates tacit knowledge into reflections and strategies. Examples illustrate relevance to career aspirations and demonstrate an understanding of tacit learning utilizing course concepts not the theories and frameworks. |
Seamlessly integrates tacit knowledge (e.g., intuitive decision-making, personal insights) into reflections and strategies. Examples are detailed and directly tied to career aspirations, showcasing how tacit knowledge informs decision-making and growth utilizing course theories and frameworks. |
||||
APA Application of the requirements of the 7th APA manual to create a standardized formatted report |
15 |
7th Ed. APA Manual is not followed with significant errors in: title page & references pages. In-text citations, paraphrasing and direct quotes are lacking but do not rise to the level of plagiarism |
7th Ed. APA Manual is followed with significant errors in: title page & references pages. In-text citations, paraphrasing and direct quotes are lacking but do not rise to the level of plagiarism |
7th Ed. APA Manual is followed with minor errors in: formatted title page, formatted references pages, in-text citations, paraphrasing and direct quotes are adequately used in the correct context |
7th Ed. APA Manual is followed with no errors including: properly formatted title page, properly formatted references pages, in-text citations are correctly used, paraphrasing and direct quotes are properly used in the correct context |
||||
Grammar/Punctuation/Spelling Use of proper English language grammar, spelling and punctuation to create a readable paper. |
5 |
Grammar and sentence structure has major problems following standard English rules and reads with difficulty with major errors in punctuation and spelling |
Grammar and sentence structure has problems following standard English rules and reads with some difficulty with errors in punctuation and spelling |
Grammar and sentence structure mostly follows standard English rules and reads reasonably well with few errors in punctuation and spelling |
Grammar and sentence structure follows standard English rules and reads well with excellent punctuation and spelling |
||||
Readability & Style Clarity of thought and appropriate level of language use that brings the author's thoughts and ideas to the reader. |
5 |
Sentences are lacking in completeness, clearness, conciseness and are not well-structured. Transitions do not maintain flow of thought. Words are ambiguous. Tone is inappropriate to audience/assessment. Colloquial language or inappropriate use of paraphrasing is used. |
Sentences need to be more complete, clear, concise and well-constructed. Transitions do not maintain flow of thought well. Words are not precise and have some ambiguity. Tone is not appropriate to audience/assessment. Colloquial language or inappropriate use of paraphrasing is used too much. |
Sentences are mostly complete, clear, concise and well-constructed. Transitions mostly maintain flow of thought. Words are mostly precise with little ambiguity. Tone is mostly appropriate to audience/assessment. Colloquial language or inappropriate use of paraphrasing is used sparingly. |
Sentences are consistently complete, clear, concise and well-constructed with strong, varied structure. Transitions consistently maintain flow of thought. Words are quite precise and unambiguous. Tone is completely appropriate to audience/assessment. No colloquial language or inappropriate use of paraphrasing used. |
||||
Marks |
100 |
Additional Comments |
Appendix – B
Assessment Rubric for Trimetrix/ Indigo Assessment and Career Roadmap Part 2 ( Grades = 15%)
1-4 Scale |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
||||
Percentage Score |
Weight |
0-59 |
60-67 |
68-71 |
72-75 |
76-79 |
80-84 |
85-89 |
90-100 |
Grades |
F |
C |
B- |
B |
B+ |
A- |
A |
A+ |
|
Mastery Level |
Beginning |
Developing |
Competent |
Mastery |
|||||
Standard Level |
Below Standard |
Approaching Standard |
At Standard |
Exceeds Standard |
|||||
Application to Career Context Influence of Personality Traits on Career Trajectory and Performance |
25 |
Provides a vague or unclear discussion of personality traits and their influence on career trajectory or performance. Limited or no reference to tacit knowledge, no use of course theories and frameworks. |
Discusses the impact of personality traits on career trajectory and performance but lacks depth or detailed connections to tacit knowledge in professional contexts limited use of course theories and frameworks. |
Effectively analyzes the influence of personality traits on career trajectory and performance. References tacit knowledge in professional settings with relevant examples utilizing course concepts not the theories and frameworks. |
Provides a comprehensive analysis of how personality traits impact career trajectory and work performance. Clearly demonstrates the role of tacit knowledge in various professional settings (team dynamics, leadership, client interactions) with specific and insightful examples utilizing course theories and frameworks. |
||||
Labor Market Analysis |
25 |
Limited research on job openings and Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers. Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper? Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials. We write plagiarism Free Content Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties. Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions. All Rights Reserved Terms and Conditions |