For the review assignment, choose a website related to your field of study or interest. You may also use the Review Assignment Suggested Website List? to he
For the review assignment, choose a website related to your field of study or interest.
You may also use the “Review Assignment Suggested Website List” to help you search for a website, but you are not limited to these choices. Keep in mind that the website does not have to be particularly good or bad. It is your task to evaluate whether it is effective based on the criteria.
Complete the “First Draft of Review Assignment” by completing the “First Draft of Review Assignment” template. Submit the completed template to the instructor.
The final draft of this assignment uses a rubric. Please review the attached rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
ENG 105 Topic 4 First Draft of a Review Assignment (Online)
Create a Review using the Topic 4 “Review Assignment” template on one of the subjects listed below. Your review should be based on the provided criteria. Use succinct language appropriate for formal academic writing.
Complete the following:
1.For the review assignment, choose a website related to your field of study or interest.
You may also use the “Review Assignment Suggested Website List” to help you search for a website, but you are not limited to these choices. Keep in mind that the website does not have to be particularly good or bad. It is your task to evaluate whether it is effective based on the criteria. Please direct any questions to your instructor.
2. Choose three of the following five criteria to focus on in your review of the selected website:
· authority
· accuracy
· currency
· objectivity
· coverage
3. Use the Topic 4 Review Assignment template to complete your evaluation . The template has prompts in brackets and parentheses throughout, simply replace all of the text in brackets and parentheses with your own images and text. You will use the template to complete the following:
· Add an Engaging title that works like a hook.
· Choose an image that represents the subject (website) of your review. (Review the “Finding and Using Images” resource to locate copyright free images).
· Write a thesis statement that includes your chosen criteria and your overall evaluation of the website. Your thesis should be written in the following format: “The (name of website) (effective/ineffective or meets/does not meet) (your criterion 1), (your criterion 2), and (your criterion 3).”
· Choose an engaging image for each criterion using what you have learned about visual rhetoric (e.g. for currency, one may choose an image of a clock).
· Write a topic sentence that evaluates whether the subject (website) meets or does not meet the stated criteria appropriately.
· For each criterion, provide a brief definition and explain its importance.
· For each criterion, provide two pieces of evidence from the website supporting your evaluation.
· For each criterion, provide evidence supporting your evaluation from an outside source
· For each criterion, write a conclusion statement.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. Be sure that in-text citations and reference entries follow 7th edition APA guidelines.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance. Please be sure to review your LopesWrite score before submitting the draft to your instructor.
The final draft of this assignment uses a rubric. Please review the attached rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
You will receive completion points for the first draft based upon the successful submission of your draft. The points are not an evaluative statement about your draft; be sure to consider all instructor comments as you revise your draft.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
image1.png
,
ENG-105 Topic 5 Rubric: Review Assignment (ONL)
Criteria |
% Value |
1: Unsatisfactory |
2: Insufficient |
3: Approaching |
4: Acceptable |
5: Target |
% Scaling |
0% |
65% |
75% |
85% |
100% |
|
Content 60% |
||||||
Justification of provided criteria using research |
30% |
The criteria are incomplete and may lack relevant description or justification. No research or off-topic research is not effectively integrated. |
The criteria are not fully justified or described. Little research or some irrelevant research. Not all research is integrated. |
The criteria are justified, described, and researched. Some research is relevant and integrated. |
The criteria are justified, described, and researched. Most research is relevant and integrated. |
The criteria are thoughtfully justified, described clearly, and well-researched. All research is relevant and integrated effectively. |
Evaluate how the subject does (or does not) meet the established criteria |
30% |
Evidence from the website and outside sources may not be present or may not support the conclusions of the evaluation against the established criteria. Evaluations of the website may not be present or relevant. Images may not be included. |
Evidence from the website and outside sources may not support the conclusions of the evaluation against the established criteria. Evaluations of the website may not be complete or relevant. Images are included. |
Evidence from the website and outside sources sometimes support the conclusions of the evaluation against the established criteria. Evaluations of the website are present. Some relevant images are included. |
Evidence from the website and outside sources are used to support the conclusions of the evaluation against the established criteria. Evaluations of the website are present and relevant to the criteria. The chosen images are relevant. |
Evidence from the website and outside sources are carefully chosen to support the conclusions of the evaluation against the established criteria. Evaluations of the website are thorough and show an impressive level of depth. The chosen images are relevant and add value to the evaluation. |
Organization, Effectiveness, and Format 40% |
||||||
Organization |
10% |
No apparent organization is present. Ineffective introductory title and image does not invite readers or explain the subject. The statement is not present or missing elements. Underdeveloped sections lack focus and topic sentences. Conclusion is weak or missing. |
The review may not be organized or may not follow template guidelines. Introductory title and image may not relate to subject. Thesis statement may not be complete. Main sections may not be developed around topic sentences and may not always support ideas. and topic sentences. Weak conclusion is offered. |
The review is somewhat organized within the template guidelines. Introductory title and image relate to subject but may not engage readers. Thesis statement may not identify all criteria or may not clearly state the evaluative conclusion. Some sections may not be developed around topic sentences and may not always support ideas. Conclusion summarizes but does not conclude. |
The review is organized within the template guidelines. Introductory title and image are relevant to the subject but may not fully engage readers. Thesis statement identifies criteria and the evaluative conclusion. Most sections are well-ordered, developed around topic sentences, and support ideas. Conclusion may be more of a summary. |
The review is logically organized within the template guidelines. Introductory title and image engage readers and is relevant to the subject. engages readers and is relevant to the subject. Thesis statement identifies criteria and the evaluative conclusion. Well-ordered sections are developed around topic sentences and advance ideas. Conclusion provides strong call-to-action for readers. |
Paper Format |
10% |
The template may not be used. Not all information, paraphrases, quotations, and borrowed ideas are cited on the page they appear; little or no in-text citations and/or entries on reference page used; major documentation oversights noted; major format errors and omissions noted; inappropriate number of required sources used. |
The template may not be used appropriately. Not all information, paraphrases, quotations, and borrowed ideas are cited on the page they appear; missing more than one citation and/or reference entry; significant documentation oversights noted; significant format errors or omissions noted; inappropriate number of required sources used. |
The template may not be used fully. Not all information, paraphrases, quotations, and borrowed ideas are cited on the page they appear; missing one in-text citation and/or reference entry; minor documentation oversights noted; minor formatting errors or omissions noted; appropriate number of required sources are used. |
The template is used appropriately. All information, paraphrases, quotations, and borrowed ideas are cited on the page that they appear and are listed on the references page (APA format); some minor errors or omissions in format noted; appropriate number of required sources is used. |
The template is used appropriately. All information, paraphrases, quotations, and borrowed ideas are cited in parenthetical APA format; all sources are listed on the references page (APA format); all citations and reference entries are complete and in alphabetical order; appropriate number of required sources is used. |
Language Use and Style |
10% |
Voice and tone are inappropriate and ineffective in creating appropriate mood. Inappropriate word choice used. Sentence structure includes ungrammatical structures and no variety. Writing is wordy. |
Voice and tone are inappropriate and ineffective in creating appropriate mood. Word choice fails in use of appropriate, precise language and strong verbs. Includes too many “to be” verbs. No attempt to vary sentence structure noted. Writing is wordy. |
Voice & tone usually do not characterize ideas appropriately or effectively create appropriate mood. Word choice may include nonstandard outdated usage, and may lack of active verbs, concrete language, and precise words. Some slang or jargon exists in the paper. Inadequate variety in sentence structure noted. Writing is wordy. |
Voice & tone usually characterize ideas effectively create appropriate mood. Word choice usually includes current standard usage, active verbs, concrete nouns, and precise words. Some slang or jargon exists in the paper. Some variety of sentence structures strengthens the ideas, creates vitality, and avoids choppiness in the writing. Writing is mostly concise. |
Voice & tone characterize ideas and effectively create appropriate mood. Word choice includes current standard usage, active verbs, concrete nouns, and precise words. Sentence structures strengthen the ideas, create vitality, and avoid choppiness in the writing. Writing is concise. |
Grammar and Mechanics |
10% |
Demonstrates no control of grammar, spelling, & punctuation conventions. Many errors, such as: Apostrophe use Capitalization Commas misplaced or missing. Parallelism Faulty point of view shifts Pronoun agreement Quotation errors Semicolons misused. Run-ons & fragments Spelling errors Subject-verb agreement Tense shifts |
Demonstrates minimal control of grammar, spelling, & punctuation conventions. Several errors, such as: Apostrophe use Capitalization Commas misplaced or missing. Parallelism Faulty point of view shifts Pronoun agreement Quotation errors Semicolons misused. Run-ons & fragments Spelling errors Subject-verb agreement Tense shifts |
Demonstrates reasonable control of grammar, spelling, & punctuation conventions. Some errors, such as: Apostrophe use Capitalization Commas misplaced or missing. Parallelism Faulty point of view shifts Pronoun agreement Quotation errors Semicolons misused. Run-ons & fragments Spelling errors Subject-verb agreement Tense shifts |
Demonstrates high control of grammar, spelling, & punctuation conventions. Few errors, such as: Apostrophe use Capitalization Commas misplaced or missing. Parallelism Faulty point of view shifts Pronoun agreement Quotation errors Semicolons misused. Run-ons & fragments Spelling errors Subject-verb agreement Tense shifts |
Demonstrates outstanding control of grammar, spelling, & punctuation conventions. No errors, such as: Apostrophe use Capitalization Commas misplaced or missing. Parallelism Faulty point of view shifts Pronoun agreement Quotation errors Semicolons misused. Run-ons & fragments Spelling errors Subject-verb agreement Tense shifts |
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
,
ENG-105 Topic 4 Review Assignment Template (ONL)
[Engaging Title that Works Like a Hook]
Paste at least one engaging representing your website image here:
(This is an example. Replace this image with your own)
Thesis Goes Here: Based on an evaluation of criterion 1, criterion 2, and criterion 3, [your assessment of your review subject].
Criterion 1 [Replace with your criterion]
Paste one image that depicts criterion one here:
(This is an example. Replace this image with your own)
Topic sentence: (Add your Topic sentence here) The Topic sentence should follow a format such as, “The subject (meets/ does not meet) criterion 1 effectively because (your overall conclusion for this criterion)”.
Definition and Importance of Criterion: (Briefly define criterion and explain its importance).
Evidence for your evaluation should include the following:
· Support for evaluation of the subject from the website.
· Support for evaluation of the subject from the website.
· Support for evaluation of the subject from an outside source.
Conclusion of Criterion 1: (Add a suggestion for improvement or overall conclusion for criterion 1 here).
Criterion 2 [Replace with your criterion]
Paste one image that depicts criterion one here:
(This is an example. Replace this image with your own)
Topic sentence: (Add your Topic sentence here) The Topic sentence should follow a format such as, “The subject (meets/ does not meet) criterion 1 effectively because (your overall conclusion for this criterion)”.
Definition and Importance of Criterion: (Briefly define criterion and explain its importance).
Evidence for your evaluation should include the following:
· Support for evaluation of the subject from the website.
· Support for evaluation of the subject from the website.
· Support for evaluation of the subject from an outside source.
Conclusion of Criterion 2: (Add a suggestion for improvement or overall conclusion for criterion 2 here).
Criterion 3 [Replace with your criterion]
Paste one image that depicts criterion one here:
(This is an example. Replace this image with your own)
Topic sentence: (Add your Topic sentence here) The Topic sentence should follow a format such as, “The subject (meets/ does not meet) criterion 1 effectively because (your overall conclusion for this criterion)”.
Definition and Importance of Criterion: (Briefly define criterion and explain its importance).
Evidence for your evaluation should include the following:
· Support for evaluation of the subject from the website.
· Support for evaluation of the subject from the website.
· Support for evaluation of the subject from an outside source.
Conclusion of Criterion 3: (Add a suggestion for improvement or overall conclusion for criterion 3 here).
Create a reference page for the sources you cited for your examples (List alphabetically)
References
Include your references here. Be sure to include all required sources. Also, be sure to use a hanging indent and to double-space the reference entries. Before submitting, remove all template instructions.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
image1.jpeg
image2.jpeg
image3.jpeg
image4.jpeg
image5.png
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.