Do you agree with your peer about the ethical decisions that should be considered? Why or why not? Which of the ethical decisions your peer mentioned d

 USE THESE QUESTIONS TO RESPOND TO PEERS POSTS BELOW

1. Do you agree with your peer about the ethical decisions that should be considered? Why or why not?
2. Which of the ethical decisions your peer mentioned do you think is the best? Why?
3. What are the ethical implications of the decision you identified in response two? 

NICOLE POST

Mass incarceration of juveniles has been an issue related to global justice that I have noticed a lot in the media lately.  A lot of this young individuals are throwing their lives away over something that could have been avoided, simply talked out, or their actions could have been a means to survive. In today’s society, these youths are going down the wrong path. Causing them to spend the rest of their lives or majority of it in a world they are not ready for. Many find their selves in these situations because that want to be down, noticed, or a part of something, or had no choice. Sad reality is they truly don’t know what they are getting their selves involved in, until they are standing in front of a judge and sentenced. Using the utilitarian framework, building community centers that teens can use as safe havens instead of turning to the streets would help reduce youth incarceration. Providing tutors, computers, counselors, mentors, STEM, video games, food, comfort, and security. A place where they can relax and be teens. Having assistance programs that are youth-based where food and clothes vouchers can be allocated to those who need it. Shelters where they are not judged but given resources that will be used as a steppingstone, and not seen as a crouch that will hinder them from progression. Also, prison reform would help benefit these young offenders, by giving them something to look forward to. Implementing programs where they learn a trade, get their GED, or a certificate that they can use in the outside world. Mental health, so the root of their issues can be addressed. Giving them tools, that will help them strengthen and build a better person, where they have the necessities to turn their lives around and want better. All of these options have the benefits and abilities of helping these youths. However, with limited money, resources, and funding, this is going to be on ongoing issue.

ISABELLA POST

One global justice issue that recently gained attention in the media is climate-induced migration. A recent news report highlighted how rising sea levels and extreme weather events are forcing communities in low-lying regions, such as Pacific Island nations, to abandon their homes. This raises ethical questions about responsibility and equitable support for displaced populations.

Using a utilitarian framework to examine this issue requires consideration of decisions that maximize well-being and minimize harm for the greatest number of people. Two ethical decisions stand out:

1. Providing Financial and Logistical Support for Climate Refugees:
   Wealthier nations, often the largest contributors to greenhouse gas emissions, could allocate resources to support climate migrants. This might include creating legal pathways for relocation, providing housing, and funding infrastructure development in host countries.
   • Strengths: This decision acknowledges the moral responsibility of high-emission countries and directly addresses the needs of displaced populations. It also promotes global cooperation and reduces suffering.
   • Limitations: It requires substantial financial investment and may provoke resistance in host countries due to cultural differences or economic concerns.
2. Investing in Climate Adaptation and Mitigation in Vulnerable Areas:
   Governments and international organizations could focus on building resilient infrastructure in at-risk regions to prevent displacement. This might involve constructing sea walls, improving disaster response systems, and transitioning to sustainable energy sources.
   • Strengths: This decision proactively reduces the likelihood of displacement and helps communities maintain cultural and social ties. It also contributes to long-term environmental sustainability.
   • Limitations: The high costs and technological demands of such projects may be prohibitive, especially for developing nations. Furthermore, the benefits may not be immediate, which could leave current migrants unsupported.

When applying a utilitarian framework, cultural perspectives play a significant role in shaping ethical decisions. For example, collectivist societies may prioritize community well-being and support climate migrants as a shared responsibility. In contrast, individualist cultures might focus on national self-interest and stricter immigration policies. These differing perspectives highlight the challenge of reaching globally accepted solutions.

While the utilitarian approach emphasizes maximizing overall well-being, it also underscores the complexity of balancing immediate humanitarian needs with long-term environmental goals. Addressing climate-induced migration requires global collaboration that respects cultural differences while striving for equitable and sustainable outcomes.