Students from Kenya, Miami (USA), and Mexico will collaboratively assess a case involving a police officer killing an unarmed 19-year-old, examining the rol

Students from Kenya, Miami (USA), and Mexico will collaboratively assess a case involving a police officer killing an unarmed 19-year-old, examining the roles and actions of criminal justice actors in each country. They will compare and contrast the procedures, challenges, and outcomes of handling the case across their jurisdictions.

Fact Pattern:

Fact Pattern: A 19-year-old unarmed male, named David, is shot and killed by a police officer during a routine traffic stop. The incident occurs in a residential neighborhood in the evening. The police officer, a five-year veteran of the force, claims that he believed David was reaching for a weapon. However, multiple witnesses reported that David raised his hands and was complying with the officer's commands. Body camera footage from the officer is partially obstructed, capturing only audio and some visual cues. The community is outraged, leading to protests and demands for justice. The case gains national media attention, putting pressure on the criminal justice system to respond transparently and effectively.

Key Actors in the Criminal Justice System:

  1. Law Enforcement Agencies
  2. Prosecutors
  3. Judiciary (Judges and Courts)
  4. Internal Affairs/Police Oversight Bodies
  5. Defense Attorneys
  6. Media
  7. Civil Society Organizations

Assignment Structure:

  1. Introduction:
    • Briefly introduce the case scenario and outline the objectives of the assignment.
    • The assignment will be done in teams, with representation from Kenya, Miami, and Mexico in each team.
  2. Role Identification and Analysis:
    • Each student will detail the role of one key actor from their country’s perspective.
    • Explain the typical process followed by the actor in a police-involved fatality case.
    • Discuss any notable challenges faced by these actors in their country.
  3. Country-Specific Analysis:
    • Kenya:
      • Role and challenges of the Independent Policing Oversight Authority (IPOA).
      • Procedures followed by the Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI).
      • Judicial process and notable cases involving police use of force.
    • Miami (USA):
      • Role of internal affairs divisions and external oversight bodies like the Civilian Investigative Panel.
      • Federal and state prosecution processes.
      • Function of the judiciary and notable cases involving police use of force.
    • Mexico:
      • Role of the Comisión Nacional de los Derechos Humanos (CNDH) and state-level oversight bodies.
      • Investigative procedures by law enforcement.
      • Judicial processes and the impact of recent judicial reforms on police accountability.
  4. Comparative Analysis:
    • Students will collaborate to compare and contrast how the police-involved fatality case would be handled in each country.
    • Highlight differences in procedures, legal frameworks, and effectiveness.
    • Discuss the influence of cultural, political, and social factors on the handling of police use of force cases.
  5. Conclusion:
    • Summarize key findings from the comparative analysis.
    • Reflect on best practices and lessons learned from each country's approach.
    • Propose recommendations for improving the handling of police use of force cases in their own countries based on insights gained.
  6. Presentation:
    • Each team will prepare a presentation summarizing their findings.
    • Presentations should include visual aids (e.g., charts, graphs, comparative tables).
    • A Q&A session will follow each presentation to engage the entire class in discussion.

Deliverables:

  1. Written Report:
    • Detailed analysis of the role of each criminal justice actor.
    • Comparative analysis section with insights and recommendations.
    • Report should be well-structured, with clear headings and subheadings.
  2. Presentation:
    • A comprehensive video summarizing the key points of the written report.
    • Videos are to be uploaded to YouTube and be no more than 15 minutes long.
    • Engaging visuals and concise explanations.
  3. Peer Review:
    • Each student will review the contributions of their peers, providing constructive feedback on their analysis and collaboration.

Collaborative Assignment: Comparative Analysis of Police-Involved Fatalities in Criminal Justice

Objective:

Students from Kenya, Miami (USA), and Mexico will collaboratively assess a case involving a police officer killing an unarmed 19-year-old, examining the roles and actions of criminal justice actors in each country. They will compare and contrast the procedures, challenges, and outcomes of handling the case across their jurisdictions.

Fact Pattern:

Fact Pattern: A 19-year-old unarmed male, named David, is shot and killed by a police officer during a routine traffic stop. The incident occurs in a residential neighborhood in the evening. The police officer, a five-year veteran of the force, claims that he believed David was reaching for a weapon. However, multiple witnesses reported that David raised his hands and was complying with the officer's commands. Body camera footage from the officer is partially obstructed, capturing only audio and some visual cues. The community is outraged, leading to protests and demands for justice. The case gains national media attention, putting pressure on the criminal justice system to respond transparently and effectively.

Key Actors in the Criminal Justice System:

1. Law Enforcement Agencies

2. Prosecutors

3. Judiciary (Judges and Courts)

4. Internal Affairs/Police Oversight Bodies

5. Defense Attorneys

6. Media

7. Civil Society Organizations

Assignment Structure:

1. Introduction:

· Briefly introduce the case scenario and outline the objectives of the assignment.

· The assignment will be done in teams, with representation from Kenya, Miami, and Mexico in each team.

2. Role Identification and Analysis:

· Each student will detail the role of one key actor from their country’s perspective.

· Explain the typical process followed by the actor in a police-involved fatality case.

· Discuss any notable challenges faced by these actors in their country.

3. Country-Specific Analysis:

· Kenya:

· Role and challenges of the Independent Policing Oversight Authority (IPOA).

· Procedures followed by the Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI).

· Judicial process and notable cases involving police use of force.

· Miami (USA):

· Role of internal affairs divisions and external oversight bodies like the Civilian Investigative Panel.

· Federal and state prosecution processes.

· Function of the judiciary and notable cases involving police use of force.

· Mexico:

· Role of the Comisión Nacional de los Derechos Humanos (CNDH) and state-level oversight bodies.

· Investigative procedures by law enforcement.

· Judicial processes and the impact of recent judicial reforms on police accountability.

4. Comparative Analysis:

· Students will collaborate to compare and contrast how the police-involved fatality case would be handled in each country.

· Highlight differences in procedures, legal frameworks, and effectiveness.

· Discuss the influence of cultural, political, and social factors on the handling of police use of force cases.

5. Conclusion:

· Summarize key findings from the comparative analysis.

· Reflect on best practices and lessons learned from each country's approach.

· Propose recommendations for improving the handling of police use of force cases in their own countries based on insights gained.

6. Presentation:

· Each team will prepare a presentation summarizing their findings.

· Presentations should include visual aids (e.g., charts, graphs, comparative tables).

· A Q&A session will follow each presentation to engage the entire class in discussion.

Deliverables:

1. Written Report:

· Detailed analysis of the role of each criminal justice actor.

· Comparative analysis section with insights and recommendations.

· Report should be well-structured, with clear headings and subheadings.

2. Presentation:

· A comprehensive video summarizing the key points of the written report.

· Videos are to be uploaded to YouTube and be no more than 15 minutes long.

· Engaging visuals and concise explanations.

3. Peer Review:

· Each student will review the contributions of their peers, providing constructive feedback on their analysis and collaboration.

Evaluation Criteria:

Criteria

Emerging (1-2 points)

Satisfactory (3-4 points)

Proficient (5-6 points)

Excellent (7-8 points)

Role Identification and Analysis

Roles of actors are vaguely identified and poorly analyzed, lacking depth and clarity.

Roles are identified with basic analysis, but lacks some details or clarity.

Roles are clearly identified and well-analyzed with adequate depth and understanding.

Roles are thoroughly identified and analyzed with exceptional depth, clarity, and insight.

Country-Specific Analysis

Limited and superficial analysis of the country's procedures and challenges, missing key elements.

Analysis covers basic aspects but may miss some details or key challenges.

Comprehensive analysis of procedures and challenges, with minor details missing.

Detailed and nuanced analysis of procedures and challenges, providing a thorough understanding of the context.

Comparative Analysis

Minimal comparison with little to no identification of differences and similarities.

Basic comparison with some identification of differences and similarities, but lacks depth.

Clear and well-organized comparison with good identification of differences and similarities.

In-depth and insightful comparison, excellently highlighting differences, similarities, and implications.

Conclusion

Conclusions are unclear or unsupported by the analysis; lacks reflection and recommendations.

Conclusions are present but may be weakly supported or lacking in reflection and practical recommendations.

Conclusions are well-supported by the analysis, reflecting good understanding and offering practical recommendations.

Conclusions are strongly supported, showing deep understanding and offering insightful, practical recommendations.

Presentation

Disorganized presentation with unclear points, poor visuals, and lacking engagement.

Somewhat organized presentation with basic visuals; engagement may be lacking.

Well-organized presentation with clear points, good visuals, and engagement.

Exceptionally well-organized and engaging presentation with clear, concise points and excellent visuals.

Written Report

Report is poorly structured, with unclear headings and subheadings; many grammatical errors.

Report has basic structure, but may have some unclear sections or grammatical errors.

Report is well-structured with clear headings and subheadings; minor grammatical errors.

Report is excellently structured, with clear and logical flow; virtually error-free.

Collaboration and Teamwork

Minimal collaboration; uneven contributions with poor coordination among team members.

Basic collaboration with some uneven contributions; coordination could be improved.

Good collaboration with fairly even contributions and effective coordination.

Excellent collaboration with balanced contributions and seamless coordination among team members.

Peer Review

Incomplete or superficial peer review, providing minimal constructive feedback.

Basic peer review with some constructive feedback, but may lack depth.

Detailed peer review with good constructive feedback and suggestions for improvement.

Thorough and insightful peer review with comprehensive constructive feedback and valuable suggestions.

Total Points:

· Emerging: 8-16

· Satisfactory: 17-32

· Proficient: 33-48

· Excellent: 49-64

Grading Scale:

· Emerging (8-16 points): Needs significant improvement; understanding and analysis are below expectations.

· Satisfactory (17-32 points): Meets basic expectations with some areas needing improvement.

· Proficient (33-48 points): Meets and sometimes exceeds expectations; shows good understanding and analysis.

· Excellent (49-64 points): Exceeds expectations with thorough, insightful, and well-organized analysis and presentation.

Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers

Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.

Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS

Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?

Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.

We write plagiarism Free Content

Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.

Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.

Related Posts

All Rights Reserved Terms and Conditions
College pals.com Privacy Policy 2010-2018