The deliverable for this step should reference the work previously completed, namely the problem statement report and the theoretic approach. You might have
The deliverable for this step should reference the work previously completed, namely the problem statement report and the theoretic approach. You might have several models because a problem can be solved multiple ways. For example, profit can be increased by lowering average cost, increasing demand, or decreasing the price elasticity of demand combined with a price increase. In each of these approaches, you will have different data needs.
For example, if the problem is that profits are dropping because of decreasing demand, then a deficiency may be a better understanding of the consumer market and what affects preferences for the product. Or another deficiency might be the need to understand how international political and trade relations affect exports of the product. The main part of this deliverable should be a consideration of what further information is needed to address the question and what you hope that information will help you understand.
The deliverable for this step should reference the work previously completed, namely the problem statement report and the theoretic approach. You might have several models because a problem can be solved multiple ways. For example, profit can be increased by lowering average cost, increasing demand, or decreasing the price elasticity of demand combined with a price increase. In each of these approaches, you will have different data needs. For example, if the problem is that profits are dropping because of decreasing demand, then a deficiency may be a better understanding of the consumer market and what affects preferences for the product. Or another deficiency might be the need to understand how international political and trade relations affect exports of the product. The main part of this deliverable should be a consideration of what further information is needed to address the question and what you hope that information will help you understand.
Seek quantitative and qualitative information. Quantitative data consists of numerical information. Examples may be an estimate of the dollar effect of the problem on profit or sales. Qualitative information is nonnumeric and consists of things you observed or read such as the implications of a pending piece of legislation or a change in consumer preferences toward or against a product.
1
7
Value-Based Management (VBM) and Decision Making Process in the Renewable Energy Sector
Introduction
In today's rapidly changing economic landscape, firms face many questions that guide their strategies, differentiate their competitiveness, and ensure profitability. Suppose an organization wants to determine what resources to allocate, where and how to invest, or how to maximize returns and respond to market forces. In that case, they must evaluate their decision-making. Value-Based Management (VBM) is a critical framework for this evaluation. It aligns company operations, strategies, and decisions to create long-term value for stock owners (Firk et al., 2021). The above questions have greatly influenced renewable energy despite its rapid growth as it struggles with shifting demand, competitive market, regulatory pressure and technological innovation (Firk et al., 2021). This paper examines VBM's application to decision-making in the renewable energy sector, particularly regarding one critical threat to the industry's health, namely regulatory uncertainty. Through framing the problem statement in terms of economic and ethical aspects, this analysis observes what role industry leaders can play in discovering solutions that contribute to societal good while maximizing shareholder value.
Problem Statement
A significant problem for the renewable energy sector is regulatory risk, which stems from unstable government policies, subsidies, and mandates that create unpredictable environments for long-term investments. This volatility poses a problem for renewable energy firms as they try to achieve both financial stability and strategic flexibility in order to meet the demands of their shareholders. How can these companies manage the financial and strategic risks of regulatory uncertainty in order to deliver long-term value in a policy environment that is inherently volatile?
Evaluating Decision-Making in Renewable Energy
The decision-making in the renewable energy industry is also affected by the characteristics of the industry, which include high capital intensity, government support, and extended project duration. The primary objective of VBM is to make every decision in a company to add value to the company (Alanizi, 2023). In renewable energy, VBM fosters a firm understanding of which investments or projects contribute more towards creating long-term value by considering risks, market conditions, and the regulatory environment (Alanizi, 2023). In this industry, decision-making is usually made on large projects that need a lot of capital investment and time before the returns are realized. For instance, solar and wind power projects are capital-intensive, and the returns realized may be influenced by the energy price, demand, and government incentives. In order to apply VBM to improve decision-making, firms in the renewable sector should consider the net present value NPV of these projects, the possibility of regulatory changes, and the risks of market volatility (Firk et al., 2021). VBM ties decisions to value creation, thus providing a suitable way of dealing with these challenges while maintaining an eye on the long-term strategic plan.
Market Structure Theory and the Role of Regulation
Market structure theory, or the study of industrial organization, supplies a critical framework to focus on the forces that affect the economy. The renewable energy sector has a market structure with a high level of firm competition in the market share in an expanding field (Ren et al., 2021). Rising demand for sustainable energy solutions, new entrants with next-generation technologies, and companies competing for shrinking government subsidies influence the competitive landscape. These factors play off one another to determine the profitability of the market, how the demand is elastic, and what the barriers to entry are (Ren et al., 2021). Due to the high stakes of renewable energy projects, even small changes in the regulatory structure can result in significant changes in marketplace cost, demand, and competition.
As a result of the industry's dependence on government support to compensate for expensive production costs, the renewable energy industry is particularly susceptible to regulatory fluctuations (Ren et al., 2021). Reductions of subsidies or, more subtly, changes in tax incentives can nibble profit margins, stall projects, and make them uneconomical. In addition, regulations that enforce carbon reduction targets are likely to benefit some energy sources over others, changing market dynamics and sharpening competition (Ren et al., 2021). In this case, regulatory uncertainty is an essential element of the market structure affecting the product's supply and demand, influencing the firms' strategic decisions and profitability.
Addressing Regulatory Uncertainty
The regulatory ambiguity in the renewable energy industry can be solved with the combined help of strategic resilience and ethical responsibility. From a strategic standpoint, firms may invest in different energy sources, including solar, wind, and hydropower, and operate from different locations, thereby protecting themselves from policy risk (Bakhary et al., 2024). This allows them to eliminate the risk of losses if a government alters its regulations and the incentives it supplies to these companies. In addition, technological advancement is paramount as it enhances cost-cutting in the operations of renewable energy firms, increases energy production, and reduces dependence on subsidies to run their businesses (Bakhary et al., 2024). This emphasis on portfolio diversification and high-tech machinery not only enhances their flexibility but also enhances their positioning within an intensifying market.
Strategic partnerships are another way of managing the regulatory environment, as the company has no control over it. In partnership with other industry participants, academic institutions, and even local government entities, renewable energy companies can pool their assets, technologies, and intelligence to buffer their businesses against policy fluctuations (Bakhary et al., 2024). For instance, cooperation with local authorities may serve both parties' common goal, as both will gain from the development of the regional economy and energy saving. Furthermore, partnerships with other organizations in the energy industry will enable a united front when dealing with the policymakers in a bid to ensure that the policies developed will favor the growth of sustainable energy solutions (Bakhary et al., 2024). Thus, strategic partnerships not only guarantee operational reliability but also enable firms to engage in the formation of the industry's rules and policies.
From an ethical point of view, the leaders in renewable energy have a social and environmental responsibility to manage the business for profit and other social and environmental concerns (Huang et al., 2019). This is especially important because the industry's objectives are in harmony with the general fight against climate change and the use of fossil fuels. A virtuous leader would ensure that he or she speaks for policies that are good for the industry and, at the same time, for the environment in the future (Huang et al., 2019). Through constructive discussion with the policymakers, industry leaders can make recommendations for the policy environment that supports sustainable behaviors, protects the public, and provides certainty for the business. This approach strengthens the metalworking industry's environmental stewardship and encourages transparent and equitable rules to follow so businesses can grow responsibly and sustainably.
Transparency is also crucial to ensure the confidence of shareholders and other stakeholders impacted by regulatory risk. Ethical leadership means explaining the nature of policy risks and problems to employees and what is being done to manage these risks (Huang et al., 2019). This level of disclosure shows the stakeholders that the organization is fully aware of the possible risks that threaten the regular running of the business; this enhances the investors' confidence and, at the same time, guarantees that the company's business principle is grounded on ethical considerations. Thus, by positioning regulatory uncertainty as a strategic problem and a social problem, leaders can develop positive stakeholder relationships and undertake economic and ethical goals. Therefore, managing regulatory risk with strategic resilience and ethical sensitivity is an effective model for managing policy risk.
Conclusion
In the renewable energy sector, the risk of regulatory change is a significant threat to organizations' stability and ability to create value over the long term. To meet this challenge, firms need to implement a value-based management system that links strategic decision-making to the objective of sustainable growth. By expanding their business portfolios, increasing their R&D spending, and partnering with the government, firms can better prepare for changes in the regulatory environment. In addition, by considering the ethical dimension of the problem, renewable energy leaders can position their responses in a way that would be both financially and socially responsible. This approach to decision-making enhances organizations against the variability of regulatory environments and provides a viable and socially responsible model for value creation in the renewable energy sector.
References
Alanizi, M. (2023). A Value-Based Modeling Framework For Solar Energy Utilization And Monitoring (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Alabama at Birmingham).
Bakhary, N. J., Azman, N., & Elabjani, A. (2024). Decision-Making Under Uncertainty: Lessons from Renewable Energy Sector Professionals. Journal of Resource Management and Decision Engineering, 3(2), 32-40.
Firk, S., Richter, S., & Wolff, M. (2021). Does value-based management facilitate managerial decision-making? An analysis of divestiture decisions. Management Accounting Research, 51, 100736.
Huang, W., Lee, G. T., & Zhang, X. (2023). Dealing with uncertainty: A systematic approach to addressing value‐based ethical dilemmas in behavioural services. Behavioral Interventions, 38(4), 1-15.
Ren, S., Hao, Y., & Wu, H. (2021). Government corruption, market segmentation and renewable energy technology innovation: Evidence from China. Journal of Environmental Management, 300, 113686.
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
