PSY 112: Psychology of Human Relations Assignment

Critical Thinking, Communication, & Value Clarification

SLO: Justify values, determine how they develop, and decide how they affect you. Develop small group

collaboration skills. Develop critical thinking skills. Illustrate effective communication skills.

This assignment is an opportunity to practice critical thinking skills, apply reflective listening, develop

emotional intelligence, and improve value clarification. Utilize many of the skills/concepts you have

learned throughout the course like using “I” statements, exhibiting empathy, interpreting body

language, and watching for defense mechanisms.

1. You are to think about a concern/issue that you have in one of the following areas: social, moral,

political, family, work, cultural, or current news stories. Think about what aspects of the issue or

concern that you believe need to be changed.

2. Research background information about your concern, find the history behind it, and what

events led up to this point.

3. Find arguments that both support and oppose your view. (CQ Researcher from the online library

databases would be a great source.)

4. Try to find 3 people who have a different perspective from you on your issue. Ask their views

about your concern and use reflective listening and empathy to understand their stances.

• This is about having a mature conversation. Always show respect even when you may

not agree with someone’s words. Do your best to put yourself in their shoes and

understand the world from their viewpoint.

5. Prepare a PowerPoint presentation of the research you accumulate. Make sure to cite your

sources throughout the presentation using APA formatting and provide a slide with your list of

references in alphabetical order at the end of the presentation.

In the presentation:

• Provide a title page with your name and presentation topic.

• Explain your topic, define terms that may be unfamiliar to others, provide background

about the issue.

• Provide slides with researched information with a minimum of three points that

supports your stance and slides with information with a minimum of 3 points that

opposes your viewpoint.

• Explain your personal perspective on the topic

• On 3 separate slides, generally describe each individual you interviewed (approximate

age, gender, status, etc.) and summarize their key points.

• Provide a conclusion summarizing what you gained from this project.

• Don’t forget that reference page.

6. Submit your presentation in the appropriate location provided

© Jennifer Hess and Indian Hills Community College

PSY 112: Psychology of Human Relations Assignment

COURSE ASSESSMENT/ASSIGNMENT RUBRIC

Bold items used for IHCC Assessment

All items used for Assignment

Criteria Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Needs Improvement Inadequate Did not complete /AI/Plagiarism

Identify key issue, define terms, provide background information.

Clearly and accurately, identifies key issue and provides comprehensive background

Identifies key issue, uses proper definitions, provides background information but may lack detail.

Vague description of key issue, brief, missing, or inaccurate definitions, inadequate amount of background information

Brief or unclear responses.

Did not complete AI/Plagiarism

Tallies

Research & Support

Provided 4 or more well-researched strong points supporting stance. Valid sources.

Provided 3 or more accurate points supporting stance. Reliable sources

Minimal information, fewer than three points, or weak support for the stance. Unreliable sources

One or two points, unclear arguments, and/or inaccurate information. Unreliable or lacking sources

Did not complete AI/Plagiarism

Tallies

Research & Opposition

Provided 4 or more well-researched strong points opposing stance

Provided 3 or more accurate points opposing stance.

Minimal information, fewer than three or weak points not fully recognizing opposing views.

One or two points, unclear arguments, and/or inaccurate information

Did not complete AI/Plagiarism

Tallies

Personal Perspective/Values

Personal perspective is clearly explained

Personal perspective is clearly explained with insightful

Personal perspective is explained but lacks depth or clarity.

Unclear explanation of how student perceives issue.

Did not complete AI/Plagiarism

PSY 112: Psychology of Human Relations Assignment

with insightful reflection on the topic. Opposing research and differing perspectives acknowledged while expressing personal values towards topic

reflection on the topic.

Tallies

Interviews Each interviewee is described with approximate age, gender, status, and their key points are summarized accurately and comprehensively on three separate slides.

Each interviewee is described with approximate age, gender, status, and their key points are summarized accurately on three separate slides.

Descriptions of interviewees are incomplete or key points are summarized minimally.

Interviewee descriptions and key points are missing or inadequate.

Did not complete AI/Plagiarism

Tallies

Conclusion Conclusion provides a comprehensive summary of what was gained from the project, reflecting on the process and findings.

Conclusion summarizes what was gained from the project, reflecting on the process and findings

Conclusion provides a minimal summary of what was gained from the project, lacking reflection.

Conclusion is unclear or missing.

Did not complete AI/Plagiarism

Tallies

PSY 112: Psychology of Human Relations Assignment

References Reference page is complete, formatted correctly, and includes all sources used.

Reference page is complete and includes all sources used but may have minor formatting errors.

Reference page is incomplete or has significant formatting errors.

Reference page is missing or lacks necessary information.

Did not complete AI/Plagiarism

Tallies

Spelling/Grammar Free from spelling and grammatical errors

1-3 spelling/grammatical errors (typos, misspelling, etc..)

4 or more spelling/grammatical errors

Significant number of spelling/grammatical errors making assignment difficult to read

Did not complete AI/Plagiarism

Tallies

Organization/ Presentation Quality

Visually appealing slides that are easy to read. Appropriate use of images, graphs, and bullet points.

Adequate slides, easy to read, appropriate images.

Appropriate content but difficult to comprehend due to small font, color choices, and/or disorganized placement.

Disorganized slides – out of order of presentation instructions or bizarre formatting. Difficult to follow or read due to small font size, placement, or color choices.

Did not complete AI/Plagiarism

Tallies

Total Points for IHCC Assessment: 16

Total Points for HR Assignment: 36

Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers

Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.

Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS

Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?

Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.

We write plagiarism Free Content

Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.

Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.