Week 9: COMPLEX CASE STUDY PRESENTATION-Participants Discussion 2
Week 9: COMPLEX CASE STUDY PRESENTATION-Participants Discussion
Respond at least 2 times each to all colleagues who presented this week (should be 2-3 presenters each week). The goal is for the discussion forum to function as robust clinical conferences on the patients. Provide a response to 1 of the 3 discussion prompts that your colleagues provided in their video presentations. You may also provide additional information, alternative points of view, research to support treatment, or patient education strategies you might use with the relevant patient.
TO PREPARE
Please read week 7 presentation SOAP note (file attached), and please respond to the following questions in two different discussions , ½ to 1 page each with at least 2 peer-reviewed references each.
Discussion Questions:
1. What are the commonly seen differences in the presentation of anxiety disorder symptoms in older adults and younger patients?
2. As clinicians who are prescribing psychotropic medications to older adults’ persons, what are the recommended considerations?
THE ASSIGNMENT
Please read week 9 presentation SOAP note (file attached), and please respond to the following questions in two different discussions , ½ to 1 page each with at least 2 peer-reviewed references each.
1. What are the commonly seen differences in the presentation of anxiety disorder symptoms in older adults and younger patients?
2. As clinicians who are prescribing psychotropic medications to older adults’ persons, what are the recommended considerations?
LEARNING RESOURCES
Required Readings
• Stern, T. A., Fava, M., Wilens, T. E., & Rosenbaum, J. F. (2016). Massachusetts General Hospital psychopharmacology and neurotherapeutics. Elsevier.
o Chapter 14, “Dementia” (pp. 146–147 only)
• Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (n.d.). Social Determinates of Health.Links to an external site. Healthy People 2030. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://health.gov/healthypeople/priority-areas/social-determinants-health
• Stahl, S. M. (2021a). Stahl’s essential psychopharmacology: Neuroscientific basis and practical applications (5th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
o Chapter 12, “Dementia: Causes, Symptomatic Treatments, and the Neurotransmitter Network Acetylcholine”
Required Media:
• American Geriatrics Society 2019 Beers Criteria Update Expert Panel. (2019). American Geriatrics Society 2019 updated AGS Beers Criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adultsLinks to an external site.. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 67(4), 674–694. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15767
Links to an external site.
• Chisolm , M. S., & Payne, J. L. (2016). Management of psychotropic drugs during pregnancyLinks to an external site.. British Medical Journal, 352. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h5918
PRAC_6675_Week9_Discussion_Participant_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResponses 85 to >76.0 pts
Excellent
Responses exhibit synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings…. Responses provide clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources…. Responses demonstrate synthesis and understanding of Learning Objectives…. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues…. Presenters’ prompts/questions posed in the case presentations are thoroughly addressed…. Responses are effectively written in standard, edited English. 76 to >67.0 pts
Good
Responses exhibit critical thinking and application to practice settings…. Responses provide clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by 2 or more credible sources…. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues…. Presenters’ prompts/questions posed in the case presentations are addressed…. Responses are effectively written in standard, edited English. 67 to >59.0 pts
Fair
Responses are on topic and may have some depth…. Responses may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and only one or no credible sources are cited…. Responses posted in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication…. Presenters’ prompts/questions posed in the case presentations are inadequately addressed. 59 to >0 pts
Poor
Responses may not be on topic and lack depth…. No credible sources are cited…. Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective professional communication…. Responses to colleagues’ prompts/questions are missing.
85 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParticipation 15 to >13.0 pts
Excellent
Meets requirements for participation by responding at least twice to each colleague who presented this week. Responses are carried out over multiple days between Days 4 and 7. 13 to >11.0 pts
Good
Meets requirements for participation by responding at least twice to each colleague who presented this week, over at least 2 days. 11 to >10.0 pts
Fair
Participants respond at least twice to each colleague who presented this week, but responses may occur all in 1 day. 10 to >0 pts
Poor
Does not meet requirements for participation by responding at least twice to each colleague who presented this week.
15 pts
Total Points: 100
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
