For this assignment, you will prepare a 3 to 4 page review
For this assignment, you will prepare a 3 to 4 page review of the literature pertinent to INFECTION CONTROL AND PREVENTION IN THE NICUs and to use that review to propose a methodology to address the problem.
Conduct a search of literature relevant to the problem/topic. Identify a minimum of 4 references, most of which are randomized clinical trials. Only one opinion articles may be included. (MAY USE ARTICLES ATTACHED TO THE POST)
Read the peer-reviewed articles with the focus of preparing a document that will compare and contrast the information in the articles you found. Copies of the articles used must be submitted with the final assignment.
The reader of your literature review should be able to clearly identify the gaps in the knowledge in the problem area as well as the purpose of the study you are proposing. You should be able to write enough to create an effective argument but not so much that the result looks padded.
Prepare an Evidence Matrix using the template attached
Submission Instructions:
The assignment is 3-4 pages in length and follows current APA 7 format including citation of references. (in paragraph form)
Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last 5 years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
Journal articles and books should be referenced according to the current APA7 style.
FOR THE EVIDENCE MATRIX:
The Evidence Matrix can help you organize your research before writing your literature review. Use it to identify patterns and cohesions in the articles you have found similar methodologies? common theoretical frameworks? It helps you make sure that all your major concepts covered. It also helps you see how your research fits into the context of the overall topic.
A literature review provides a summary of previous research on a topic that appraises, categorizes, and compares what has been previously published on a specific topic. It lets the author to synthesize and place into context the research and scholarly literature relevant to the topic. It helps to plan the different methods to a given question and reveals patterns. It forms the foundation for the author’s subsequent research and defends the significance of the new investigation.
The introduction should define the topic and set the stage for the literature review. It will include the author's perspective or point of view on the topic, how they have defined the scope of the topic (including what's not included), and how the review will be organized. It can point out overall trends, conflicts in methodology or conclusions, and gaps in the research.
In the body of the review, the author should organize the research into major topics and subtopics. These groupings may be by subject, type of research such as case studies, methodology such as qualitative, genre, chronology, or other common characteristics. Within these groups, the author can then discuss the evidences of each article and examine and compare the importance of each article to similar ones.
The conclusion will summarize the main findings of the review of literature supports or not the research to follow and may give direction for further research.
The list of references will include full citations for all the items mentioned in the literature review.
*PLEASE ATTACH A COPY OF A PLAGIARISM AND AI REPORT , I HAVE TO TURN IN THIS ASSIGNMENT TO TURN IT IN *
*PLEASE ATTACH THE SCHOLARLY ARTICLES USED*
Evidence Matrix
Name: ______________________________ Date: _____________________________
Author |
Journal Name/ Year of Publication |
Research Design |
Sample Size |
Outcome Variables Measured |
Quality (A, B, C) |
Results/Author’s Suggested Conclusion |
Research Design Options: Quantitative, Qualitative, Systematic Review, Mixed Method Study
Outcome variables measured: what is the researcher trying to measure or investigate. The aim or objective of the study.
Quality is very subjective: This is your opinion so you cannot get this wrong. Choose from the following:
A: (High) Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
B: (Moderate) Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
C: (Low) Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
,
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Infection prevention and control in neonatal
units: An ethnographic study of social and
clinical interactions among healthcare
providers and mothers in Ghana
Gifty Sunkwa-MillsID 1,2*, Kodjo Senah3, Britt Pinkowski Tersbøl2
1 Ghana Health Service, Central Region, Kasoa, Ghana, 2 Global Health Section, Department of Public
Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, 3 Department of Sociology, University of Ghana,
Accra, Ghana
Abstract
Introduction
Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are a global health challenge, particularly in low-
and middle-income countries (LMICs). Infection prevention and control (IPC) remains an
important strategy for preventing HAIs and improving the quality of care in hospital wards.
The social environment and interactions in hospital wards are important in the quest to
improve IPC. This study explored care practices and the interactions between healthcare
providers and mothers in the neonatal intensive care units (NICU) in two Ghanaian hospitals
and discusses the relevance for IPC.
Methodology
This study draws on data from an ethnographic study using in-depth interviews, focus group
discussions involving 43 healthcare providers and 72 mothers, and participant observations
in the wards between September 2017 and June 2019. The qualitative data were analysed
thematically using NVivo 12 to facilitate coding.
Findings
Mothers of hospitalized babies faced various challenges in coping with the hospital environ-
ment. Mothers received sparse information about their babies’ medical conditions and felt
intimidated in the contact with providers. Mothers strategically positioned themselves as
learners, guardians, and peers to enable them to navigate the clinical and social environ-
ment of the wards. Mothers feared that persistent requests for information might result in
their being labelled “difficult mothers” or might impact the care provided to their babies.
Healthcare providers also shifted between various positionings as professionals, caregivers,
and gatekeepers, with the tendency to exercise power and maintain control over activities
on the ward.
PLOS ONE
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283647 July 7, 2023 1 / 22
a1111111111
a1111111111
a1111111111
a1111111111
a1111111111
OPEN ACCESS
Citation: Sunkwa-Mills G, Senah K, Tersbøl BP
(2023) Infection prevention and control in neonatal
units: An ethnographic study of social and clinical
interactions among healthcare providers and
mothers in Ghana. PLoS ONE 18(7): e0283647.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283647
Editor: Kahabi Ganka Isangula, Agha Khan
University, UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA
Received: July 28, 2021
Accepted: March 14, 2023
Published: July 7, 2023
Copyright: © 2023 Sunkwa-Mills et al. This is an
open access article distributed under the terms of
the Creative Commons Attribution License, which
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided the original
author and source are credited.
Data Availability Statement: All relevant data are
within the manuscript and its Supporting
Information files.
Funding: This study was supported by the Danish
Ministry of Foreign Affairs as part of the HAI-Ghana
project (DANIDA grant number 16-PO1-GHA). The
funders played no direct role in the study design or
preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared
that no competing interests exist.
Conclusion
The socio-cultural environment of the wards, with the patterns of interaction and power,
reduces priority to IPC as a form of care. Effective promotion and maintenance of hygiene
practices require cooperation, and that healthcare providers and mothers find common
grounds from which to leverage mutual support and respect, and through this enhance care
for mothers and babies, and develop stronger motivation for promoting IPC.
Introduction
Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) remain a global health challenge [1, 2], with associ-
ated direct and indirect costs to health institutions, families, and individuals [3, 4]. Neonatal
intensive care units (NICUs), with neonates receiving complex medical therapy in a highly
technical environment, are challenging environments in which to maintain patient safety [5].
HAIs are responsible for more than a quarter of the estimated neonatal deaths in hospitals in
LMICs [6]. In Ghana, the overall HAI prevalence rate is 8.2% among hospitalized patients [7].
In the NICU, mothers of babies on admission are important stakeholders, and their
involvement is critical in improving the quality of care [8, 9]. Although mothers are not solely
responsible for the care of their babies, their constant presence in the therapeutic space renders
them important stakeholders in care, whose concerns and roles need to be considered [8, 9].
This also requires that the underlying social relations of power are recognized and considered
[10]. The medical encounter has been portrayed as a place where patients are subordinated to
physicians’ domination. The unequal power relationships between healthcare providers (HPs)
and clients (including patients, caretakers, and mothers) are a central factor at the core of
addressing quality of care [11–15]. The differences in provider and client access to power and
decision-making are further accentuated by the different statuses of providers and clients [16].
In Ghana, research has shown how power relationships affect the quality of care women
receive during childbirth [17, 18]. HPs play a key role in involving and empowering mothers.
However, mothers’ reliance on the perceived expertise of HPs enforces unequal power rela-
tions [12, 19].
The joint endeavour of meaningful collaboration between HPs and mothers in managing
the risk of infection in this context is complex and compounded with challenges [20–22]. In
this context, HPs are often more focused on the provision of clinical care and are uncertain
about how to engage parents and relatives in care delivery [8, 9]. Although IPC as a form of
care may seem less of a priority to HPs, management of the risk of infection constitutes a cru-
cial aspect of care.
Limited research exists on the social environments of NICUs in low- and middle-income
settings including the interaction between HPs and mothers [23–26]. Using Positioning The-
ory, this ethnographic study explores care practices in two NICU wards in Ghana, to identify
challenges and opportunities for improved IPC.
Conceptual framework
Positioning Theory is a psycho-sociological concept of how people position themselves and
others within society and in institutions [27–29]. It is concerned with revealing the patterns of
reasoning that underlie how people behave toward one another [28]. This theory has been
applied to workplace interactions in fields ranging from public relations [30, 31] to
PLOS ONE Infection prevention and control in the neonatal unit
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283647 July 7, 2023 2 / 22
Abbreviations: FA, Facility A (Tertiary Hospital; FB,
Facility B (Secondary Hospital; FGD, Focus Group
Discussions; GHS, Ghana Health Service; HAIs,
Healthcare-Associated Infections; HPs, Healthcare
providers; IDIs, In-depth interviews; IPC, Infection
Prevention and Control; LMICS, Low-and middle-
income countries; MOH, Ministry of Health; NICU,
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit; WHO, World Health
Organization.
interprofessional relations in healthcare, including how HPs see themselves in relation to
other colleagues, patients and their relatives [32, 33]. Harré and colleagues explain that "posi-
tioning theory studies refer to cognitive processes that are instrumental in supporting the
actions people undertake, particularly by fixing for this moment and this situation what these
actions mean" [28].
HPs orient themselves to the hierarchies and duties attached to their professional functions
in the hospital setting. Communication and negotiations about hygiene and IPC compliance
also take place in this context [32]. Among HPs, collaboration across organisational bound-
aries remains challenging, and power dynamics affect the strategic choices about how and with
whom to collaborate [13]. Positioning theory [28, 30, 34] is employed to shed light on the
necessity and functionality of positions in this context.
Positioning theory has been used to examine how people produce and explain their behav-
iour and that of others, and how positions are invoked and negotiated [29, 34–37]. Positioning
and other-positioning may result in marginalization, decreased opportunities, and exclusion
[38]. HPs are continuously engaged with mothers in the NICU context, with its characteristic
structural and socio-cultural working conditions. Focusing on the positionings of HPs and
mothers, the relevant factors and the framework within which care is delivered are explored.
From the Foucauldian perspective, the hospital ward can be described as a ‘heterotopia’, a
relatively segregated place in which several spatial arrangements and rules co-exist, practices
and power structures interconnect, and various lines of interest, identity, authority, and activ-
ity intersect [39]. Doctors, nurses, administrators, patients, and families, who are involved in
this space subscribe to a set of cultural norms and base their expectations and decisions on
professional information, knowledge, and background [40–42].
Power shapes social inequalities experienced by individuals and communities as well as
health collaboration, participation, and ownership [43]. In hospital settings, where there is an
asymmetrical power difference between clients and HPs [11, 44], any form of collaboration
toward improving the quality of care is associated with complexities. Continuous attention
should be focused on the care practices in such contexts [45]. Using positioning theory, we
explore the potential to attend to and strengthen care practices in hospital wards.
Methodology
Study setting
Ghana is a West African country with a population of about 30.3 million and is divided into 16
regions, constituting the northern, middle, and southern zones [46]. Ghana has 10 regional-
level hospitals which form secondary-level referral points from primary care centres, and 5
teaching hospitals providing tertiary-level care in the public sector [47]. This study occurred in
two purposively selected hospitals in southern Ghana: the Greater Accra region and the East-
ern region. The Greater Accra region was selected because it is the national capital and has
some of the largest health facilities in the country. The Eastern region was selected due to logis-
tical reasons, with its proximity to the national capital. This study was conducted in the NICU
of a tertiary-level hospital and a secondary-level hospital, which were purposively selected as
part of a larger field study on HAIs in Ghana [7, 47]. The two hospitals selected for this study
have an average HAI prevalence rate of 10.2%, which is above the overall HAI prevalence rate
of 8.2% among hospitalized patients in Ghana [7].
The tertiary-level hospital (hereafter referred to as Facility A or FA) is a 2,000-bed hospital
in Accra in the Greater Accra region and serves as a referral centre for most hospitals in the
southern zone and beyond. FA has a 55-bed NICU and a 261-bed maternity unit. The NICU
admits approximately 2400 neonates yearly. The secondary-level hospital (hereafter, FB) is in
PLOS ONE Infection prevention and control in the neonatal unit
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283647 July 7, 2023 3 / 22
Koforidua in the Eastern region and has a 356-bed capacity that serves the population of the
Eastern and other nearby regions. FB has a 30-bed NICU and a 54-bed maternity unit. The
NICU admits about 1000 neonates yearly.
Study design
We used an ethnographic approach involving qualitative in-depth interviews, focus group dis-
cussions (FGDs), and participant observations to collect data between September 2017 and
June 2019. Ethnographic research emphasizes "being there" and gaining an insider perspective
by observing and interacting with people in the setting, as participants become more comfort-
able with the researchers’ presence [48]. Ethnographic studies require long periods in the field
to experience the everyday lives of participants [49, 50]. This can provide a deeper insight into
social phenomena, and help in understanding the organisational and cultural aspects of patient
safety research [51].
Multiple data collection methods were employed as the hallmark of a good qualitative study
[52, 53] and to present an in-depth understanding of the topic under study. FGDs help to gain
an understanding of how individuals collectively construct meanings and provide deeper and
richer data due to group dynamics [43]. Participant observation was done to familiarize with
the care processes and appreciate the relationships and interactions between the various partic-
ipants. The first author (GSM) conducted most of the in-depth interviews and FGDs, with the
help of two trained research assistants, who have degrees in health-related fields and experi-
ence in qualitative research.
The first author (GSM) is a female medical doctor and Ph.D. researcher with a background
in anthropology and public health. GSM, under the guidance of the Ph.D. supervisors, BPT
(last author, an associate professor of public health with a background in anthropology and
qualitative research), and KS (second author, a professor of social science with decades of expe-
rience in qualitative research) trained the research assistants and also supervised them during
data collection. The researchers were not familiar with the participants before the study.
Recruitment and data collection
Purposive sampling was used to recruit HPs working in the two hospitals. We considered the
various categories of HPs on the wards during the selection, to achieve diversity in terms of
staff cadre and level of experience. HPs were approached during their break period, informed
about the research, and invited to participate. The study included doctors, nurses, auxiliary
nurses, midwives, hospital managers, IPC coordinators, and ward in-charges at the maternal
and NICU wards with more than 6 months of experience in the hospital. The study excluded
HPs working in the outpatient departments and those who were on study leave or transfer at
the time of the study. Forty-three HPs participated in in-depth interviews.
Women 15 years and older, whose babies had been admitted to the NICU for a minimum
of 48 hours were eligible to participate in the study. The mothers were selected purposively to
ensure that they had spent different periods in the NICU so they could share their varied per-
spectives on care. Mothers were recruited from the maternity and NICU wards, as some moth-
ers spent their time between the two wards. Mothers were approached, informed about the
study, and invited to participate. None of the participants who were invited refused to partici-
pate in the study. A total of 32 mothers participated in the in-depth interviews, and a conve-
nience sample of 40 eligible mothers participated in 6 FGDs, 3 in each hospital, with 6–8
women per group.
Interviews lasted 45 to 60 minutes and FGDs lasted 60 to 90 minutes. Interviews were con-
ducted face-to-face in the hospital, and in quiet side rooms on the wards, or in available
PLOS ONE Infection prevention and control in the neonatal unit
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283647 July 7, 2023 4 / 22
conference rooms or meeting rooms. Demographic information was collected. A semi-struc-
tured interview guide (S1 Appendix) which had been pilot-tested was used to capture partici-
pants’ experiences with ward interactions and IPC compliance, but it was open to include
other perspectives. Some mothers’ interviews were conducted in English and others in Twi.
At the point of data saturation, no new information was generated from the interviews. We
conducted 6 FGDs with 40 mothers. We considered this sample size sufficient to fulfil the
objectives of this study, based on a predicted thematic saturation after 5 FGDs, with an allow-
ance for an extra FGD after data saturation.
Participants were provided refreshments (drinks and snacks) during the interviews.
The first author and 2 research assistants conducted participant observations intermittently
in the two hospitals. The observations were done on the wards during both the day and night
shifts, using an observation guide (S2 Appendix). This was done on 2 or more days in a week
in each hospital over the period of the research. The combination of participant observation
and interviews provided insight into how perceptions were translated into action [52–54].
During participant observations, researchers participated in activities, assisted by handing
over items during procedures, and supported HPs when they needed help to fetch items or to
arrange the wards. Informal conversations were held with HPs during work or while they were
on break. We took down observation notes and documented any interesting incidents during
the observation period. Observation notes were taken during participant observation (S3 File).
Data analysis
Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Interviews conducted in Twi were
translated into the English language during transcription and then checked for accuracy. Data
were analysed thematically based on the objectives of the study [55, 56]. Relevant contextual
information from interview notes and field notes were incorporated for further ethnographic
analyses [50]. The transcripts were uploaded to QSR N Vivo 12 to support coding and analysis.
The data was triangulated, and similar codes were grouped into categories. Initial codes were
descriptive and close to the data [57]. The categories were then regrouped into subthemes and
themes. Our theoretical orientation was drawn from the positioning theory [28, 34] which
informed the framework for analysis. The initial reading of the transcripts was done by all
authors. GSM conducted the majority of the analysis; however, the co-authors (KS and BPT)
<p
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.