Acco rding to Gordon Allport, prejudice often involves the prejudgment of individuals because of their real or perceived group memberships. Based on your understanding of this theory, re
Acco rding to Gordon Allport, prejudice often involves the prejudgment of individuals because of their real or perceived group memberships.
Based on your understanding of this theory, reply to the following:
- Discuss in detail the proposition given by Allport about prejudice that identification with all humankind can significantly reduce negative prejudice.
Also, Gordon Allport and Raymond Cattell differ in their approaches to researching personality, with Allport using the idiographic approach and Cattell using the nomothetic approach.
- What are the main differences between the two approaches? Discuss at least two pros and two cons of each approach.
- Does research gain from using the Big Five factor theory instead of using either Cattell's model or Eysenck's model? Discuss.
- Does the Big Five factor theory limit research? Explain.
Hans Eysenck argued that personality is largely biologically determined, or is hereditary.
- Discuss this proposition.
- Provide evidences that support and negate this proposition?
Response one
Allport's proposition was that when people identify with all humankind, they are less likely to experience prejudice against others because they recognize that they are connected and part of a larger group. This understanding allows people to recognize their shared humanity and value the diversity that exists among us.
When we look at Allport's idiographic approach it focuses on an individual's unique traits (study of one's case), while Cattell's nomothetic approach focuses on general patterns of behavior. The pros of the idiographic approach are that it allows for an in-depth study of one's personality and the cons include that it can be time-consuming and expensive. The pros of the nomothetic approach are that it is more scalable and allows for quicker results, while the cons include that it can be less accurate due to the reliance on general patterns.
Yes, research can be gained from using the Big Five factor theory because it provides a more holistic view of the personality. Also, the theory is more widely accepted and is more applicable to a wider range of individuals. This theory is more up-to-date with modern psychological research. It also limits research because it only focuses on five aspects of personality, which may not capture the full range of personality traits. It may not account for individual differences, such as culture and environment, which can influence how people perceive themselves and others.
less
response 2
According to Gordon Allport, prejudice results from people making preconceptions about other people based on their true or alleged involvement in a group. He stated that negative prejudice may be greatly decreased through connection with all of humanity. People might transcend the dividing lines of being associated with a certain group by expanding their sense of self to include all people, fostering empathy and understanding. By minimizing the "us versus them" mentality, this inclusive affiliation fosters a society that is more just and caring.
Different methods were used by Allport and Raymond Cattell to investigate personality. Allport was a supporter of the idiographic approach, which focuses on individual characteristics. This method underlines the uniqueness of everyone's experiences and personality qualities, taking an integrated perspective. Cattell, on the other hand, used the nomothetic method, which looks for universal principles and characteristics. This method is more quantitative and looks for traits and patterns that are shared by large numbers of people.
The idiographic method brings several advantages. First of all, it offers a complete, nuanced insight into each person's personality, which is very helpful in therapeutic scenarios. Secondly, it avoids the problems of generalizations by acknowledging and showcasing each person's uniqueness. But it also has disadvantages. It can require a lot of time and resources, and applying its conclusions to broader groups can be challenging. On the other hand, the nomothetic method has the benefit of having a wider range of possibilities and the capacity to achieve general principles that can guide a variety of psychological treatments. It can, however, ignore individual variations and occasionally overgeneralize the intricacy of the human psyche.
The Big Five factor theory is a useful solution for Cattell's or Eysenck's models in research. A more confined Approach is provided by The Big Five, which centers on five major dimensions: neuroticism, agreeableness, extraversion, conscientiousness, and openness. Numerous empirical studies have established the validity and reliability of this paradigm in a range of settings and cultures. In comparison with Eysenck's three-factor model and Cattell's sixteen personality variables, the Big Five offers a more comprehensive and balanced analysis of personality features. It is not without restrictions, though. By simplifying personality into only five dimensions, the Big Five risks overgeneralizing personality complexity and possibly disregarding other significant features. Its broad factors may also fail to explain the small distinctions among each feature.
According to Hans Eysenck, personality is primarily genetic and determined by biology. Countless twin and adoption studies that reveal strong biological effects on personality traits lend validity to this theory. For example, research investigations have shown that very identical personality traits are often shown by identical twins raised apart, indicating there is an important hereditary component. Moreover, research has tied particular genetic markers to particular personality traits, giving Eysenck's theory a biological foundation. This point of view is not without dissatisfaction though. Opponents say that environmental influences on personality, including upbringing, culture, and life events, are also very important. Longitudinal studies offer evidence that challenges the idea that personality can only be predicted by biology by showing that personality can vary over time as a result of social relationships and life events. Therefore, while genetics plays a role in personality, a complete understanding involves taking into account the interaction between biological and environmental elements. References
Nicholson, I. A. M. (1997). To “Correlate Psychology and Social Ethics”: Gordon Allport and the First Course in American Personality Psychology. Journal of Personality, 65(3), 733–742. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00333.x
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.