Describe U.S. intelligence oversight
Discussion: Describe U.S. intelligence oversight and if you think it is a sufficient process. If not, how should it be changed? Other than issues surrounding privacy and individual freedoms (addressed next week), describe some ethical considerations concerning gathering domestic intelligence and performing intelligence activities within the homeland.
Response #1 (Jordan): The United States intelligence community plays a crucial role in safeguarding the nation’s security and interests. However, the oversight of these agencies is a complex and contentious issue. The current system of intelligence oversight involves multiple layers of checks and balances, including congressional committees, executive branch supervision, and judicial review. U.S. intelligence oversight is primarily conducted by the Congressional intelligence committees, which are tasked with monitoring and reviewing the activities of the various intelligence agencies. Additionally, there are independent bodies such as the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board that provide additional layers of oversight. While these mechanisms are intended to prevent abuse and ensure accountability, some critics argue that they are insufficient to effectively monitor the vast scope of intelligence activities. Concerns have been raised about the lack of transparency in certain surveillance programs, as well as potential conflicts of interest within the oversight bodies themselves. One way to achieve an increased level of transparency is by providing more information about the IC’s activities and decision-making processes. This could involve releasing more declassified documents, holding regular press briefings, and engaging with the public through social media.
Besides concerns about privacy and individual freedoms, there are several ethical considerations surrounding the gathering of domestic intelligence. One ethical concern the oversight committees must take into consideration is the potential for abuse of power by government agencies. Without proper oversight and accountability, there is a risk that intelligence activities could be used to target political opponents or marginalized communities. Another ethical concern is the potential for discrimination and profiling based on race, religion, or other factors. Intelligence activities must be conducted in a way that respects the rights and dignity of all individuals, regardless of their background. It is imperative for those involved in domestic intelligence gathering to uphold ethical standards and prioritize the protection of individual rights while fulfilling their duty to safeguard national security.
Response #2 (Yovel): Class,
The process of intelligence collection raises several ethical concerns when conducted within the U.S. Homeland. Currently, intelligence oversight exists to safeguard civil liberties, privacy, and various ethical considerations. This oversight involves Congress and several other crucial players, including Executive level involvement such as the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board (PIAB), and additional support from bodies like the NSC and OMB. Congress plays a particularly important role as its oversight enables it to control resources such as funding and budgets, shape the capabilities of the Intelligence Community (IC) through legal structures, and hold influence over IC leadership electees. At the Executive level, the PIAB provides the President with assessments regarding the capabilities and actions of the Intelligence Community, which are pivotal for ensuring accountability.
Intelligence oversight is indeed a sufficient process, but its effectiveness can be enhanced when supported and complemented by other measures such as legal frameworks, internal controls within intelligence agencies, and active engagement with stakeholders and overseers. However, actions like threatening to withhold funds until compliance is met could potentially hinder the effectiveness of oversight and even jeopardize national security.
Apart from civil liberties and individual freedoms, intelligence collection efforts must adhere to non-discriminatory practices in their investigations. Highlighted in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance (FISA) Act Amendments Act of 2008 and later cases, concerns have been raised regarding the targeting of Muslim individuals and communities. After the Protect America Act (PAA) essentially authorized the IC to target personnel from foreign countries, it was quickly amended due to unfairly singling out individuals based on religion or ethnicity.
Week 7, almost there!
-Yovel
Aaron Pulver & Richard M. Medina (2018) A review of security and privacy concerns in digital intelligence collection, Intelligence and National Security, 33:2, 241-256, DOI: 10.1080/02684527.2017.1342929
Office of the Director of National Intelligence. (2013). U.S. National Intelligence: An Overview (12333). https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/USNI%202013%20…
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
