Due Date: November 24, 2023, at 11:59 PM No late submission will be accepted TOTAL POINTS: 20 POINTS

Due Date: November 24, 2023, at 11:59 PM No late submission will be accepted TOTAL POINTS: 20 POINTS

In a 12-page paper: Minimum of 3000 words Answer the following questions.

1. Compare and contrast the different philosophical orientations of foundational theories in psychiatry. 2 pts.

2. How do philosophical orientations of foundational theories influence each other? 2 pts

3. How do you choose a philosophical orientation of foundational theories in your practice as

a PMHNP? 2pts

4. Identify one behavioral risk factor. Describe the chosen behavioral risk factor. Discuss the

magnitude and determinants of the behavioral risk selected factor-3 pts.

5. Create a visual or graphical representation of the Transtheoretical Model of Change in

your chosen behavioral risk factors. Explain the graphical representation. 6 pts.

6. Is Motivational interviewing useful in your chosen behavioral risk factor? Explain your

answer. 2pts

7. Summarize the concepts of issues in prescribing in children and adolescents.2 pts.

8. References- minimum of 10 references- 1 point.

You will have a total of 12 pages, including:

1. Page 1-Cover page,

2. Page 2-11-Body of the paper,

3. Page 12 – Reference Page.

PLEASE CHECK THE RUBRIC ON PAGE 2

Page 1 of 2

Rubric Guidelines (NUR 644 Remediation)

Excellent Acceptable Poor

Format

Assignment follows APA guidelines.

Points: 16

Assignment contains few APA errors.

Points: 13

Assignment does not follow APA guidelines or contains several errors in APA. Points: 5

Conventions

Assignment is free of grammar, punctuation, and

spelling errors.

Points: 16

Assignments contain few grammatical, punctuation, and/or spelling errors.

Points: 13

Assignment contains several errors in grammar, punctuation,

and/or spelling.

Points: 5

Organization

Excellent organization and structure are evident throughout the assignment. The assignment contains appropriate topic sentences, transitions, and conclusions. Introduction of the topic, content, and conclusions are organized.

Points: 16

Acceptable organization and structure throughout the assignment. Areas of needed improvement noted in one of the following areas (e.g., topic

sentences, transitions, conclusions, overall organization of assignment). Points: 13

Assignments do not meet organizational standards of doctoral-level writing. Several areas of improvement were noted in more than one of the following areas (e.g., topic sentences, transitions, conclusions, overall organization of assignment).

Points: 5

Content

Excellent presentation of research and information related to the topic. The writer used appropriate and current peer-reviewed evidence-based research. Clinical discussion of the content demonstrates knowledge and application of principles related to the assigned topic.

Points: 16

Acceptable presentation of research and information related to the topic. The writer used appropriate peer-reviewed evidence- based research most of the time. Clinical discussion of the content demonstrates acceptable knowledge and application of principles related to the assigned topic; however, areas of improvement were noted.

Points: 13

Assignment does not adequately address the assigned topic. The writer did not use current peer-reviewed evidence- based research.

Points: 5