This assignment requires you to critically analyse a specific issue in the Intangible Cultural Heritage Convention.

This assignment requires you to critically analyse a specific issue in the Intangible Cultural Heritage Convention.

The issue in the convention can be put forward as a valid distinction between “safeguard” and “protect”, as Lenzerini points out: “The term ‘safeguarding’ must not be seen as equivalent to ‘protection’; rather, it encompasses a more dynamic concept which implies that international action should ‘simply’ provide an enabling environment for ICH to flourish in accordance with the needs of its creators and bearers. Lenzerini notes that “the term ‘safeguarding’ must not be seen as equivalent to ‘protecting’; rather, it encompasses a more dynamic concept, which means that international action should ‘simply’ provide an enabling environment for the free flow of ICH according to the expectations and needs of its creators and bearers…”. “. This can be interpreted in terms of the safeguard of ICH in China.