make a presentation of why it is not a good idea to add fluoride to water
Making a presentation slides I would love If you make a presentation of why it is not a good idea to add fluoride to water. And you can use the essay in the bottom. Make it like points and the explanation on the the speaker note Note: I don’t really speak English well, so can you please use an easy simple English words While you are doing the slides and the speaker notes . . . I dont want to be embarrassed infront of people! Thank you so much in Advance 🙂 Project Presentation (50 points): Due date: presentations begin Tuesday, May 7 Presentation Rubric: Effectiveness of argument (How strong or reasonable are the supporting arguments and evidence?) – 20 points Quality of presentation (Is the presentation smoothly delivered?) – 10 points Effectiveness of visual aid (How effective is the visual aid?) – 10 points Staying within time limits (6 minutes, give or take 30 seconds) – 10 points For your presentation, you will condense your argument into a six-minute presentation that will be delivered to the class; simply attempting to read your essay would be a great example of what not to do. At least one visual aid is required. Presentations will be followed by a question and answer period where your attentive audience will ask thoughtful questions. The Case Against Adding Fluoride to Water The proposal to add fluoride to water systems has long been heralded as a boon for dental health. Proponents argue this chemical compound can strengthen teeth and reduce cavities, particularly among children. However, a closer examination reveals a different reality. Permanent deforestation highlights the need to halt the mass introduction of fluoride into water resources. Still, there are arguments in favor of water fluoridation, but dental fluorosis, poor decay prevention, and possible adverse effects on overall health form a troubling picture that raises questions about the efficiency of such measures. Moreover, fluoridated water depends on personal autonomy, disregarding the population’s failing and sensitive needs. For that reason, water fluoridation must be given serious thought and an intensive examination (Smith). Among others, in this essay, we will investigate the strong arguments that should result in revisiting the matter of fluoride being put in water instead of going for the alternative ingenious approach to managing dental health that will be based on the choice and security of people. The permanent deforestation highlights the need to halt fluoride from being mass introduced into the water resources. Still, there are arguments in favor of the fluoridation of water, but dental fluorosis, poor prevention of decay, and possible adverse effects on overall health form a troubling picture that raises questions about the efficiency of such measures. Moreover, fluoridated water depends on personal autonomy, disregarding the population’s failing and sensitive needs. For that reason, the fluoridation of water must be given serious thought and an intensive examination (Smith). In this essay, we will investigate the strong arguments that should result in revisiting the matter of fluoride being put in water instead of taking the alternative, ingenious approach to managing dental health that will be based on people’s choice and security. Some people want to add fluoride to their water. They say it helps teeth, but it might not be good in the long term. We should not add fluoride to water because it can harm our teeth over time (Smith). An apparent reason for that is that excess fluoride could produce tooth fluorosis. When given high fluoride, dental fluorosis occurs in children during tooth-tooth growth. Children have ugly spots or stains on their remaining teeth, making them look uncared for and damaged. It is not injurious to health anyway, but it has poor cosmetic outcomes. Water fluoridation implies that everyone is getting some questions that would be insufficient or that children are getting too much (Smith). Fluorosis is among the most fundamental reasons to consider when adding fluoride to drinking water; its effects are likely more dominant in children. Dental Fluorosis is a condition that occurs when the enamel of the teeth is damaged due to too much fluoride exposure during the delicate years of tooth development. The damage to the enamel manifests as white streaks, spots, or stains on the surface of the teeth. Whereas the main focus of dental fluorosis is on its appearance rather than being among health risks, there is no doubt about its importance. The teeth might turn yellowish or mottled in color, causing the patient’s smile to become less appealing or even suck her or his self-esteem. This is especially critical during childhood and adolescence, when they make friends, establish their own identity, and become independent (Smith). A large number of areas have been fluoridated, bringing too much to people at risk of dental fluorosis as fluoride is introduced to drinking water. Along with this, children with teeth that just developed are at a high risk of fluoride toxicity. Unlike typical fluoride sources, such as toothpaste or topical medications, that individuals can use, water fluoridation turns its users into passive consumers, unaware of the fluorides’ [containing] level in the water they drink (Smith). Therefore, children in these communities could accidentally get fluoride in the quantity that could lead to fluorosis of teeth because this amount exceeds the fluoride content in teeth fluorosis. Additionally, the contributions of the concentrated level of fluoride that was ingested not only from the drinking water but also from other sources such as toothpaste, mouth rinses, and dietary supplements can only heighten fluorosis among the children in fluoridated areas. The above suggests that the exposure rate should be more cautious, featuring underexposure. The result, however, can have a negative effect on overall dental health, and you can end up with disfigured teeth. That is why the possible occurrence of dental fluorosis is used as a fact to oppose the disproportional addition of fluoride to water supplies. What is particularly important is that as long as you brush your teeth, the fluoride supplied in water will seldom prevent tooth decay. Research reveals that communities with fluoridated water are no less meticulous about their oral hygiene than places without the same file. Therefore, we must question whether equilibrium might not be achieved, so fluoride might not do what it intended (Smith). Another negative side of fluoride in our water is its impact on other parts of health. Some researchers stated that the adverse effects of too much fluoride might occur on bones or even in the brain. That is to say, children are more vulnerable since their bodies are still developing (not fully grown). They will be the most sensitive part of the body to fluoride’s undesirable adaptation. In addition, its contribution to the global health status, besides the effects on dental health, fluoride’s possible adverse effects on the skeleton and the brain arouse many protests, giving rise to the need for a comprehensive and independent investigation. It was found in certain studies that fluoride in large quantities can cause high density or abnormality of the bone structure that leads to some other conditions, such as skeletal fluorosis. In communities with high fluoride in their water or where supplementation is common, individuals face a higher chance of developing bone deformities, joint stiffness, and pain associated with skeletal fluorosis. Even though skeletal fluorosis (SF) is more often under occurrence in regions with higher natural fluoride concentrations, the same can be done by the addition of fluoride to drinking water supplies to the extent that affected populations could be potentially elevating their fluoride intake and consequently increasing the risk of SF. Besides, data from recent research also shows that fluoride substances can affect brain development andons, particularly in children. The brain, still being developed, is vulnerable to all environmental toxins and is susceptible to chemical substances, including fluoride. Some authors even postulate a possible link between fluoride and neurodevelopmental diseases, a decline in IQ, and cognitive deficiency. Kids are in their significantly developing heads that mature and develop very fast, which also toxicates their brains. Such long-term consequences may lead to academic failure. Considering these risks, the implementation of the fluoridation of vast populations of water supplies may bring a substantial health threat, which includes the most vulnerable people, of which children are the foremost. Supporters say that fluoride for dental health is an essential factor, and the risk of suffering from bone and brain-related issues should not be ignored as well (Michael). Hence, a prudent approach towards fluoride supplementation that considers the possible risks and benefits and the welfare of the people is more acceptable. It should focus on safety and quality of life, especially for children whose bodily growth could be interrupted by reckless fluoride consumption (Michael). As the final point, I emphasize that water fluoridation can be considered an infusion of something people choose. Someone who doesn’t want their water to be fluoridated can’t avoid it because their water is fluoridated yet. They could choose to rely on toothpaste or any other source of fluoride where they have the utmost control over the amount of fluoride they take. If fluoride was added to the water, this would be particularly dangerous to allergic individuals who have no choice but to always be exposed to such a pervasive source of fluoride through consumption of the contaminated fluoridated water. Unlike other sources of fluoride, such as toothpaste and dental procedures, where an allergic individual can either use or abstain from the usage based on their sensitivity, only the circumstance of fluoridated water restricts such individuals (Michael). Thus, people who drink alcohol may encounter higher complexity in assuring the liquor water’s safety and maintaining their health. Additionally, the overall deficiency of information concerning fluoride allergies worsens the matter since many people may be oblivious about the source of their symptoms or even link them to other factors. Furthermore, we should appreciate that fluoride has unexpected effects, such as on people who potentially have health problems or other conditions. Some diseases, for example, the kidneys, may impact the body’s metabolism, causing a grocery quantity of fluoride to accumulate in the body growingly. An overload of fluoride in the kidney belongs to patients with compromised kidney function, which is already a disease that can be treated as severe and even dangerous. Such patients can run the risk of developing serious health complications. Also, persons having hemodialysis may be prone to fluoride toxicity as the removal process is not able to remove the high content of fluoride from the bloodstream. Therefore, the blind spray of fluoride on water systems by the public may render such vulnerable people with underlying medical conditions more prone to the unfairness of “water fluoridation.” Furthermore, the aforementioned may underline “a cautionary approach” to water fluoridation. In conclusion, the proposal to introduce fluoride into water systems, allegedly to address oral health issues, is to be subjected to a recapitulation on account of the apprehensions such an addition can pose. Abnormal growth in teeth could occur. Larger bones could become brittle, the nervous systems can be affected, and the adversities of allergic people highlight the need for a more sophisticated fluoride supplementation plan. General fluoridation policies rather than engaging in the practices with individuals’ approval and complete coverage for safety and health is the best solution (Michael). Humanization can be achieved by taking into account the needs of different and sensitive populations; this will ensure that dental health promotions are effective, check fairness, and respect the rights and preferences of individuals. Fluoride addition to water could be helpful in our fight against tooth decay (Michael). The bad part is that it may not be worth doing it in the long run. The fluoride (in water) can cause dental fluorosis, and the fluoride treatment (in toothpaste, mouthwash, etc.) could have more harmful effects than being unable to use it. Besides, it removes people’s choices, which may adversely affect those allergic to fluoride. However, because water is consumed regularly, it will be good for us to give enough thought before fluoride incorporation (Michael). Work Cited Johnson, Michael A. “Impact of Fluoride Toothpaste on Oral Health Outcomes: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.” Smith, Sarah R. “Systematic Review of Long-Term Effects of Fluoride Exposure on Oral Health.” “Assessment of Fluoride Exposure from Dental Products and Its Relationship with Oral Health Conditions: A Population-Based Study.” “Longitudinal Study of Fluoride Exposure and Dental Health Outcomes in Children: Implications for Public Health Policies.” “Fluoride Levels in Drinking Water and Their Impact on Oral Health: A Cross-Sectional Study.” World Health Organization. “Fluoride in Drinking-water.” WHO, www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/publications/fluoride_drinking_water/en/. National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research. “Fluoride and Oral Health.” NIDCR, www.nidcr.nih.gov/health-info/fluoride. Environmental Protection Agency. “Fluoride: Basic Information.” EPA, www.epa.gov/dwstandardsregulations/fluoride-drinking-water. Journal of the American Dental Association. “Water Fluoridation and Public Health.” JADA, www.ada.org/en/publications/jada/topics/water-fluoridation.
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
